<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; AOL Media Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/aol-media-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>August 2011 &#8211; Top US Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Internet Audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the most visited website during August 2011 with 176 million unique US visitors. The Top Sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, with Amazon increasing its rank to become the 9th most visited site during August 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the most visited website during August 2011 with 176 million unique U.S. visitors. The Top Sites among U.S. web users remained largely the same as the month before, with Amazon increasing its rank to become the 9th most visited site during August 2011.</p>
<p>While all sites in the Top 10 saw an increase in unique U.S. visitors during the month, Amazon had the largest increase (5.9%) among the top sites.  Visitors to Facebook’s website spent the most time on average, logging over 7 hours 45 minutes using the social network over the course of the month. AOL also increased the amount of time spent by average visitors on their site by over 25% during August.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Web Brand for August 2011 (U.S., Total)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>176,235</td>
<td>1:47:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>163,163</td>
<td>7:45:49*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>149,072</td>
<td>2:12:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>134,410</td>
<td>1:43:45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>127,983</td>
<td>1:41:27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>98,168</td>
<td>0:45:05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>92,096</td>
<td>2:52:52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>79,000</td>
<td>0:18:03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>74,532</td>
<td>0:30:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>74,526</td>
<td>1:06:15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During August 2011, 176.2 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall 215 million Americans were active on the Internet in August 2011, an increase of 1.2% compared to the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/july-2011-top-us-web-brands/">previous month</a>. On average Americans spent over 30 hours online during August and visited 99 unique domains. Nielsen estimates 275 million Americans had access to the Internet during August 2011.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Average U.S. Internet Usage for August 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>3,123*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:0:56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>30:04:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>215,848,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>275,602,135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 215 million Americans were active online during August 2011, from Total Internet Audience using all sources in the US.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>* – Due to a change in the type of call used behind Facebook’s AJAX  interface, Nielsen NetView data for Facebook duration was underreported for June and July, impacting overall web use figures for those months. Therefore, Time Spent and Page Views per Person for August should not be trended against July 2011 data.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/august-2011-top-us-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audience Analysis: Behind the AOL/Huffington Post Deal</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheHuffingtonPost.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Huffington Post made its own headlines last week when it was acquired by AOL for a reported $315 million, The Nielsen Company analyzed what the Huffington Post’s audience brings to the AOL portfolio in the U.S., specifically among notable demographic groups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Huffington Post made its own headlines last week when it was acquired by AOL for a reported $315 million, The Nielsen Company analyzed what the Huffington Post’s audience brings to the AOL portfolio in the U.S., specifically among notable demographic groups.</p>
<p>With 13.2 million unique U.S. visitors in January 2011, the Huffington Post was the ninth <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/january-2011-top-u-s-web-brands-and-news-sites/">most popular non-financial news website</a> visited from home and work computers in the U.S. Its new ‘sister’ site, AOL News, was the fourth most-popular with 22.1 million U.S.-based unique visitors. AOL News is AOL&#8217;s second most popular channel – behind MapQuest – and, in effect, the Huffington Post becomes AOL&#8217;s sixth most popular property just behind AOL Messenger/AIM (with 13.3 million uniques in January) and ahead of AOL Music (with 13.1 million).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> Key Metrics for January 2011 (U.S., Home and Work)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Entity</th>
<th> Unique Audience (000)</th>
<th> Active Reach</th>
<th> Avg Time Per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
<th> Pages Viewed Per Person</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>76,173</td>
<td>38.5%</td>
<td>1:58:31</td>
<td>85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL News</td>
<td>22,060</td>
<td>11.2%</td>
<td>0:14:00</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Huffington Post</td>
<td>13,266</td>
<td>6.7%</td>
<td>0:11:39</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
Read as: During January 2011, 76.2 million unique U.S. people visited an AOL Media Network property using a PC/laptop from home or work locations.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>AOL’s network of websites attracted 76.2 million unique U.S. visitors in January 2011, or 39 percent of all active U.S. web users. Visitors to AOL’s websites spent an average of 1 hour 58 minutes during the month, viewing 85 pages on average. Based on average visitor January figures, each Huffington Post reader adds almost 12 minutes of time and 18 pages to the AOL portfolio &#8211; a total of 155 million minutes and 237 million page views.</p>
<p>Although the Huffington Post had 13.2 million U.S. uniques in January, almost 10.2 million of them also visited an AOL website, thus the net effect of AOL’s acquisition is almost 3.1 million new visitors or 1.5 percent more reach into the active U.S. Internet population. There is also a strong overlap between the Huffington Post and AOL News. In January 2011, 44 percent of visitors to the Huffington Post also visited AOL News; with 27 percent of AOL News readers also visiting the Huffington Post.</p>
<p>It’s not just about the extra readers the acquisition brings but the type of visitor. Although the audience makeup to AOL News and the Huffington Post is broadly similar, the latter is more concentrated around certain demographic groups. For example, the Huffington Post has a higher concentration (34%) of 18-49 year old females compared to 29 pecent for AOL News. The Internet average is 27 percent.</p>
<p>Although the audiences to the two entities are spread similarly geographically across the U.S., it is notable that the Huffington Post is more likely to have visitors from the West Coast while AOL News tends to have a greater concentration of visitors from New England.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-26341" title="Huffington Post pageviews by education" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/2758_HuffPochart4.jpg" alt="Huffington Post pageviews by education" width="572" height="550" /></p>
<p>The Huffington Post audience also tends to be more highly-educated – 44 percent hold a bachelor or post-graduate degree, compared to 37 percent for AOL News, 31 percent across the entire AOL portfolio and 25 percent across the entire web.</p>
<p>A very encouraging element of Huffington Post reader behavior for AOL concerns who consumes content. Visitors from households with incomes above $150,000 account for twice the percentage of total page views consumed on Huffington Post (12%) than they account for on AOL News (7%) and across the entire Internet (6%).</p>
<p>Those with a bachelor’s degree account for 50 percent more of Huffington Post content (33%) compared to AOL News (24%) and the Internet average (22%). Most starkly, those with a post-grad degree account for almost three times the percentage of Huffington Post content (34%) than they average across the whole Internet and AOL News (both 12%).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/aol-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: Nov. 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the top-ranked Web brand in November, drawing more than 127 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Tuesday.  Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 117 million and 104 million visitors, respectively.



Rank
Brand
Unique Audience
(in 000s)
Time Per Person
(hh:mm:ss)


1
Google
127,656
1:23:40


2
Yahoo!
117,656
3:17:36


3
MSN/Windows Live
104,090
2:13:19


4
Microsoft
95,543
0:45:44


5
AOL Media Network
86,308
3:43:45


6
YouTube
81,882
1:01:33


7
Fox Interactive Media
69,838
1:39:31


8
Wikipedia
58,335
0:18:39


9
Amazon
57,682
0:25:33


10
eBay
55,438
1:43:41


Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).



View the full press release.
View the top U.S. Web brands for September and October 2008.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the top-ranked Web brand in November, drawing more than 127 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Tuesday.  Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 117 million and 104 million visitors, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Unique Audience<br />
(in 000s)</th>
<th>Time Per Person<br />
(hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>127,656</td>
<td>1:23:40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>117,656</td>
<td>3:17:36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>104,090</td>
<td>2:13:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>95,543</td>
<td>0:45:44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>86,308</td>
<td>3:43:45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>81,882</td>
<td>1:01:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>69,838</td>
<td>1:39:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>58,335</td>
<td>0:18:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>57,682</td>
<td>0:25:33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>55,438</td>
<td>1:43:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/november-2008-data-tables_final.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p><strong>View the top U.S. Web brands for </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-sept-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>September</strong></a><strong> and </strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-oct-2008/" target="_blank"><strong>October 2008</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-nov-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: Oct. 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-oct-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-oct-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Web brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=4646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google was the top-ranked Web brand in October, drawing more than 122 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Wednesday.
Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 116 million and 102 million visitors, respectively.



Rank
Top Web Brands
Unique Audience
(in 000s)
Time Per Person
(hh:mm:ss)


1
Google
122,325
1:23:07


2
Yahoo!
116,078
3:23:29


3
MSN/Windows Live
102,494
2:23:27


4
Microsoft
92,348
0:45:54


5
AOL Media Network
88,028
3:34:41


6
YouTube
77,480
0:53:25


7
Fox Interactive Media
67,182
1:37:12


8
Wikipedia
56,896
0:20:07


9
Apple
49,340
0:58:34


10
eBay
49,213
1:47:26


Source: The Nielsen Company (October 2008).



View the full press release.
View the top U.S. Web brands for September 2008.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was the top-ranked Web brand in October, drawing more than 122 million unique visitors during the month, Nielsen Online reported Wednesday.</p>
<p>Yahoo! and MSN/Windows Live rounded out the top three, with unique audiences of just over 116 million and 102 million visitors, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Top Web Brands</th>
<th>Unique Audience<br />
(in 000s)</th>
<th>Time Per Person<br />
(hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>122,325</td>
<td>1:23:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>116,078</td>
<td>3:23:29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>102,494</td>
<td>2:23:27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>92,348</td>
<td>0:45:54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>88,028</td>
<td>3:34:41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>77,480</td>
<td>0:53:25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>67,182</td>
<td>1:37:12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>56,896</td>
<td>0:20:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>49,340</td>
<td>0:58:34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>49,213</td>
<td>1:47:26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (October 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>View the full <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/press_release6.pdf">press release</a>.</p>
<p>View the top U.S. Web brands for <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/nielsen-news/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-sept-2008/" target="_blank">September 2008</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-oct-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Brands Among U.S. Internet Users: August 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-august-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-august-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN/Windows Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Yahoo! were again the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in August, according to Nielsen Online.



Rank
Web Brand
Unique Audience
(in 000s)
Time Per Person
(hh:mm:ss)


1
Google
123,690
1:25:18


2
Yahoo!
117,702
3:22:31


3
MSN/Windows Live
103,953
2:21:25


4
Microsoft
93,558
12:38:39


5
AOL Media Network
93,070
3:33:46


6
YouTube
75,442
1:01:01


7
Fox Interactive Media
70,696
1:54:24


8
eBay
55,842
1:52:01


9
Wikipedia
52,987
0:21:24


10
Apple
48,766
1:10:42


Source: The Nielsen Company (August 1, 2008 &#8211; August 31, 2008).



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and Yahoo! were again the number one- and number two-ranked Web brands in August, according to <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/press_release2.pdf">Nielsen Online</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Web Brand</th>
<th>Unique Audience<br />
(in 000s)</th>
<th>Time Per Person<br />
(hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>123,690</td>
<td>1:25:18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>117,702</td>
<td>3:22:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>MSN/Windows Live</td>
<td>103,953</td>
<td>2:21:25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>93,558</td>
<td>12:38:39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>93,070</td>
<td>3:33:46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>75,442</td>
<td>1:01:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Fox Interactive Media</td>
<td>70,696</td>
<td>1:54:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>55,842</td>
<td>1:52:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>52,987</td>
<td>0:21:24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>48,766</td>
<td>1:10:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (August 1, 2008 &#8211; August 31, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-web-brands-among-us-internet-users-august-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

