<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; allergy medication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/allergy-medication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Allergy Advertising Not Catching on as Much This Year</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/allergy-advertising-not-catching-on-as-much-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/allergy-advertising-not-catching-on-as-much-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fariba Zamaniyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV viewers seem more immune to pitches for allergy medications this spring when compared to the year before, according to a new study from Nielsen IAG. Overall, recall among allergy sufferers aged 25-54 for all the ads on air from January through May this year was 10 points lower than during the same period a year ago.
That&#8217;s not to say every ad in the category was unmemorable. An ad for Claritin featuring Nascar&#8217;s Carl Edwards was judged slightly more memorable than last year&#8217;s top ad for the category featuring the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV viewers seem more immune to pitches for allergy medications this spring when compared to the year before, according to a new study from Nielsen IAG. Overall, recall among allergy sufferers aged 25-54 for all the ads on air from January through May this year was 10 points lower than during the same period a year ago.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say every ad in the category was unmemorable. An ad for Claritin featuring Nascar&#8217;s Carl Edwards was judged slightly more memorable than last year&#8217;s top ad for the category featuring the Nasonex bee. Still, the Claritin ad failed to motivate customers to consider Claritin to the same degree as the Nasonex ad.<br />
<span id="more-13270"></span><br />
Why didn&#8217;t this year&#8217;s ads leave a strong impression? They just weren&#8217;t as good, said Fariba Zamaniyan, senior vice president at Nielsen IAG, Healthcare. &#8220;This collectively weaker performance suggests that the creative strength of the advertising is not as strong as it used to be&#8221; she said. &#8220;In these economic times especially, if you&#8217;re going to advertise on TV it has to be memorable. In a high-clutter category like allergy, you can&#8217;t afford to miss. Being average isn&#8217;t good enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>There were more advertisers overall this year (nine, up from seven a year ago) but fewer ads (20 this season, down from 24 a year ago). Ad spending for traditional media within the category from January to April declined 17 percent from a year ago, according to Nielsen Monitor Plus data. That&#8217;s about in line with spending declines in other categories, Zamaniyan said. At the same time, allergy advertisers sought the efficiencies they perceived cable TV programming could provide. Nielsen said the allocation to cable ad spending during the January-April period increased 20 percent from a year ago.</p>
<p>The most-recalled ad this year among allergy sufferers aged 25-54 was Claritin&#8217;s 15-second &#8220;Carl Edwards interview.&#8221; No. 2 was Zyrtec&#8217;s 30-second &#8220;bicycle&#8221; ad, which showed a woman taking her bicycle out of storage for a ride now that her allergy symptoms had abated. A year ago, the Nasonex &#8220;Bee next to a bottle&#8221; was No. 1, followed by Sudafed&#8217;s &#8220;Teacher head balloon,&#8221; which showed a woman&#8217;s head blowing up like a balloon as her congestion increased.</p>
<p>Creative quality also is taking the blame for this year’s ads doing less to motivate allergy sufferers to seek remedies. Nielsen IAG found intent to ask the doctor about the prescription brand advertised was down 40 percent from a year ago. Purchase interest declined nearly 20 percent. &#8220;Weaker creative which limits the ads&#8217; potential to be recalled has ultimately resulted in lower call to action levels this season,&#8221; Zamaniyan said. &#8220;Again, the number of ads on air is consistent vs. year ago so, we can&#8217;t blame it on clutter &#8211; it&#8217;s the creative.&#8221; She discounted the notion that the down economy could be totally to blame. &#8220;It may be one of the factors,&#8221; Zamaniyan said. &#8220;Advertisers and their agencies often blame the economy, but the takeaway here is that before the advertiser can influence behavior, it has to break through.&#8221; As the number of brands advertising increased, she said, that becomes critical. &#8220;If the ad is not a unique execution that stands out from the rest and connects with the viewer, then the ability to drive purchase interest or doctor contact is suppressed no matter how recognizable the brand name is,&#8221; she said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/allergy-advertising-not-catching-on-as-much-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zyrtec, PL Cetirizine Boost OTC Allergy Meds Market</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/zyrtec-pl-cetirizine-boost-otc-allergy-meds-market/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/zyrtec-pl-cetirizine-boost-otc-allergy-meds-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy medication market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Label Cetirizine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NielsenHealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over the counter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolters Kluwer Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zyrtec OTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch of Zyrtec OTC and its private label equivalent, Private Label Cetirizine, in early 2008 triggered strong incremental growth in the over-the-counter (OTC) allergy medication market in the U.S., a new analysis by NielsenHealth and Wolters Kluwer Health reports.
According to Nielsen and Wolters Kluwer, the OTC oral/nasal allergy market grew by about 30% in the first half of 2008, compared with same period in 2007.
Like Zyrtec OTC, PL Cetirizine had rapid uptake, accounting for approximately one-third of the OTC cetirizine market&#8217;s patient volume during the spring 2008 allergy season.  Zyrtec ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/medicine.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6333" title="medicine" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/medicine-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>The launch of Zyrtec OTC and its private label equivalent, Private Label Cetirizine, in early 2008 triggered strong incremental growth in the over-the-counter (OTC) allergy medication market in the U.S., a new analysis by NielsenHealth and Wolters Kluwer Health reports.</p>
<p>According to Nielsen and Wolters Kluwer, the OTC oral/nasal allergy market <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/30percentgrowth.pdf">grew by about 30%</a> in the first half of 2008, compared with same period in 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/zyrtec-otc-launch-shakes-up-allergy-drug-market/" target="_blank">Like Zyrtec OTC</a>, PL Cetirizine had rapid uptake, accounting for approximately <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/one-third_otcmarket_patientvolume.pdf">one-third of the OTC cetirizine market&#8217;s patient volume</a> during the spring 2008 allergy season.  Zyrtec OTC accounted for the remaining two-thirds of the cetirizine market&#8217;s patient volume, Nielsen and Wolters Kluwer reported.</p>
<p>Approximately <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/volumefromnewpatients.pdf">30% to 50% of PL Cetirizine&#8217;s business</a> came from patients who are new to the allergy market, according to Nielsen and Wolters Kluwer.  Another <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/switchvolumefromotherotcs.pdf">40% of PL Cetirizine&#8217;s patients</a> switched from another medication &#8212; most notably, Private Label Loratidine, Claritin OTC, and Zyrtec OTC.</p>
<p>Like many OTC products, which typically lure consumers with lower prices, PL Cetirizine has offered patients cost savings.  Patients who switched to PL Cetirizine from any prescription or OTC allergy medication <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cost-savings.pdf">saved $1.56, on average</a>, according to Nielsen and Wolters Kluwer.  Those switching from Zyrtec Rx saved an average of $6.19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/zyrtec-pl-cetirizine-boost-otc-allergy-meds-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
