<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Super Bowl Investment: Ad Spend Trends Over the Past Five Super Bowls</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they get a measurable bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011's Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they tend to get a measurable marketing bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011&#8217;s Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.  In addition, brand awareness for commercials airing during the Super Bowl was up to 275 percent higher than awareness for the same creative during regular programming.</p>
<p><strong>Cost of an Ad</strong><br />
The Super Bowl investment is economically resilient, remaining relatively stable despite fluctuations in the primetime average—and rising consistently over the past five years despite a rocky economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-30807 aligncenter" title="AvgCost-30SecAd" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif" alt="AvgCost-30SecAd" width="278" height="220" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Big Spenders: Automotive Makes a Comeback</strong><br />
2011 was the year of the auto comeback.  Spending on automotive ads far surpassed other categories and more than doubled versus previous years.  Nine different auto brands took center field in the commercial breaks, versus an average of two to four brands in years prior.  Creative quality also improved in 2011, with an unprecedented four auto spots making Nielsen’s annual <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/" target="_self">Most-Liked list</a>.  Chevrolet’s “Wild Ride” garnered the distinction of being the most watched ad of all time, with an estimated 119,628,000 viewers watching its Super Bowl airing.  This year, Chevy is breaking ground again with the Game Time app, which will leverage consumers&#8217; simultaneous cross-screen behavior and reinforce branding from traditional TV advertisements.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Super Bowl Advertising Categories (2007-2011)</strong><br />
Year Over Year Spend Breakdown (in millions)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30808 aligncenter" title="Top5-SBAdCat" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png" alt="Top5-SBAdCat" width="433" height="728" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Other Spend Trends</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Beer</strong>: Bud Light and Budweiser have dominated the turf when if comes to Super Bowl beer advertising over the past five years.  Consumers have come to expect the fleet of creatives, including the iconic Clydesdale ads.  In 2010 and 2011, other brands like Michelob and Stella Artois came to play.  What can viewers expect this year?</li>
<li><strong>Motion Picture</strong>: Movies have a strong presence in Super Bowl ad lineup, as studios capitalize on the massive audience to parade their best bets for the year.  From 2008-2011, at least one of the top five highest grossing films had a slot in the Super Bowl line up.  Motion picture ads increased after 2008 and have had a consistently strong presence during the game since, reaching ten ads in last year’s game.</li>
<li><strong>Regular Soft Drink</strong>: While fewer Soft Drink ads have traditionally aired during the Super Bowl compared to other categories, they make an impact by creating minute-long spots.</li>
<li><strong>Tortilla Chips</strong>:  Tortilla Chips have emerged as a highly anticipated category of ads, led by the fan created ads.   Last year, three Doritos ads made Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">Most Liked and Most Remembered list</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year in Sports Advertising: TV Ad Spend Grows to $10.9B</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National TV sports advertising generated $10.9 billion in revenue last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National TV sports generated $10.9 billion in advertising expenditure last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>. Measuring ad spend during sporting events on network and cable TV from Q4 2010 through Q3 2011, Nielsen also saw that cable has an increasing share of those ad dollars—growing 37.3 percent year over year compared to 5.9 percent for sports ad spending in general.</p>
<p>TV sports advertising is dominated by a few big spenders, with the top 10 — led by AT&amp;T, Bud Light, Verizon Wireless, McDonald’s and DIRECTV—accounting for roughly a quarter (26%) of the total spend during that time period.</p>
<p>The increase in TV ad spend mirrors a similar increase in the amount of live TV sports content available on TV and cable. There were more than 42,500 hours of live sporting events on national broadcast and cable TV in 2011, a five percent increase over 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30730  aligncenter" title="year-in-sports-ads" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png" alt="year-in-sports-ads" width="500" height="824" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>For more insights on sports and media, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Study: Fisher’s KOMO and KATU-TV Sees Cross-Platform Bump</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As daily deal and other hyperlocal offerings change the local media landscape, TV station operators like Fisher Communications Inc., an innovative local media company with TV, radio, Internet and mobile operations, are striving to understand their online and offline audience in order to better leverage their content and advertising inventory. Nielsen analysis revealed that for local markets, station websites may contribute added reach to both early and late news broadcasts, and the results are not insignificant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As daily deal and other hyper-local offerings change the local media landscape, TV station operators like Fisher Communications Inc., an innovative local media company with TV, radio, Internet and mobile operations, are striving to understand their online and offline audience in order to better leverage their content and advertising inventory. <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/case-study--local-cross-platform-measurement.html">Nielsen analysis</a> revealed that for local markets, station websites may contribute added reach to both early and late news broadcasts. The results are not insignificant, particularly for select audiences like those ages 18-34.</p>
<p>Seattle’s KOMO station earned an incremental reach—unduplicated audience—of 2.9 percent from their website for persons 18 and older, amounting to 10 percent of the total combined reach for the station’s late news at 11 o’clock Monday through Friday. The website contributes even more for persons 18-34, boasting a 3.9 percent incremental reach that accounts for nearly a quarter (23%) of the total combined reach.</p>
<p>For Portland’s KATU-TV, <a href="http://www.katu.com">KATU.com</a> added 2.8 percent incremental reach to the 28.1 percent reach of the late news. For KATU, ages 25-54 saw the biggest lift thanks to KATU.com with a 4.6 percent reach. The website contributed 14 percent of the combined newscast and website reach for persons 25-54.</p>
<p>Pinpointing the notable differences in demographic composition between website users and newscast viewers helps stations value their inventory, while helping advertisers choose the most efficient vehicle to reach their intended audiences. Both KOMO.com and KATU.com attract significantly different audiences than their TV station counterparts. For example, the KOMO late news audience is 29 percent male, compared to 53 percent for <a title="KOMO News" href="http://www.komonews.com" target="_blank">komonews.com</a>. Nearly one-third (31%) of the Komo late news audience and one-quarter (24%) of the komonews.com audience has a household income of $100,000+.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30711" title="station-insights-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-1.png" alt="station-insights-1" width="570" height="481" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30712" title="station-insights-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-2.png" alt="station-insights-2" width="570" height="600" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/case-study--local-cross-platform-measurement.html" target="_blank">Download the full case study at nielsen.com</a>.</p>
<p><strong>About Fisher Communications</strong><br />
Fisher Communications (FSCI) is an innovative local media company with television, radio, internet and mobile operations throughout the western United States. Fisher operates 18 television stations, which include network affiliations with ABC, CBS, FOX, Univision and The CW that reach 3.5% of U.S. television households, and three radio stations targeting a full range of audience demographics. Fisher Interactive produces more than 120 local and hyper-local websites and delivers comprehensive multiplatform advertising solutions to local businesses. The Company is headquartered at Fisher Plaza in Seattle, WA. More information about Fisher Communications, Inc. is available at <a href="http://www.fsci.com">www.fsci.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers OK with Ads&#8230; if the Apps are Free</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should look no further than free apps. According to Nielsen’s Consumer Usage Report, 51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should consider the power of free apps.  According to Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>,  51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free.  Free apps are preferred by mobile consumers, though many opt for a combination of both free and paid apps to include in their collection, which usually averages 33 apps total.</p>
<p>Among tablet and smartphone users who downloaded only free apps in the past month, 33 percent chose games, 20 percent chose social networking and 18 percent chose music.  However, app downloaders are willing to shell out money. Consumers who downloaded just paid apps or a combination of free and paid apps invested the most in games (35%), maps/navigation (29%) and music (27%).</p>
<p>For additional insights on consumer electronics and media usage, download Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30659" title="top-app-categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png" alt="top-app-categories" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Print to Digital, Slowly: The Evolution of the Circular</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-print-to-digital-slowly-the-evolution-of-the-circular/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-print-to-digital-slowly-the-evolution-of-the-circular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paper circular – whether delivered by mail, as a newspaper insert or viewed in the store – still reigns as the most popular way for shoppers to find sale items and product information, it is evolving in kind with consumers’ desire to seek deals across media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happens thousands of times per day in America: a shopper walks into the supermarket, leafs through the store circular to find discounts on products, and, fingers smudged by newsprint, sets off to shop, often with the circular in hand. But while the paper circular – whether delivered by mail, as a newspaper insert or viewed in the store – still reigns as the most popular way for shoppers to find sale items and product information, it is evolving in kind with consumers’ desire to seek deals across media.</p>
<p>To track the evolution of the store circular, one need only follow the smudge. A Nielsen survey of 11,000 shoppers found that roughly 60 percent of consumers look at printed circulars at least once a week, but today’s fingerprints are increasingly likely to be found on tablet and smartphone screens as opposed to the pages of paper circulars.</p>
<p>Retailer e-mails are just as likely to reach consumers as the paper circular, and millenials in particular are increasingly likely to view a store’s website on a PC, and are more likely than other demographics to use a social media website or smartphone as an alternative to the paper circular.</p>
<p>While a full 70 percent of shoppers have expressed a desire to have their circulars delivered digitally in some form – via e-mail or over the web – in total only 18 percent of shoppers have ever used a smartphone to determine what’s available in-store and only 33 percent have accessed that information on a tablet device. In contrast, 90 percent of shoppers still want paper delivery. Thus, the transition to digital circulars is expected to be gradual, a gentle migration that will accelerate in proportion with both shoppers’ and retailers’ level of comfort with electronic platforms.</p>
<p>For more information, download the <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/the-evolution-of-circulars-q42011.html">Evolution of Circulars (Q4 2011) report</a>, and watch the accompanying <a title="Evolution of Circulars" href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/the-evolution-of-circulars-q42011.html">webinar</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/from-print-to-digital-slowly-the-evolution-of-the-circular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thrill of the Chase: Best-Liked Ads of Q3 2011 Depict Pursuit of Love</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most liked ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love. For women, the most-liked ad was for Chevrolet Cruze Eco in which a man&#8217;s &#8220;Janet Marry Me&#8221; plane banner kept flying behind buildings, foiling his marriage proposal attempts.  Guys also showed their sentimental side; their favorite was a Staples commercial where Rico Rodriguez (known for his role on ABC&#8217;s Modern Family) fails to get a girl&#8217;s phone number with his new pens.</p>
<p>Ads for charitable causes also made their mark on TV viewers in Q3. Overall, MasterCard&#8217;s Stand Up to Cancer ads, featuring Ray Romano, took the top spot.  The Yoplait &#8220;Save Lids to Save Lives&#8221; commercial also popped out as a well-liked ad overall.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29913" title="TopAds" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif" alt="TopAds" width="575" height="1200" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Study: How Online Ad Campaign Success Varies by Site Type</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Campaign Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen recently analyzed an online CPG campaign geared towards women 25-54 that ran across three ad networks and a women’s interest site. The study showed the campaign successfully reached its intended audience only 27 percent of the time and instead was most often viewed by older demographics outside of the desired group.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen recently analyzed an online CPG campaign geared towards women 25-54 that ran across three ad networks and a women’s interest site. The study showed the campaign successfully reached its intended audience only 27 percent of the time and instead was most often viewed by older demographics outside of the desired group.</p>
<p>Even more surprising was the degree of variability between the different media sellers. Nielsen found that while the three ad networks reached the campaign’s intended audience 20-30 percent of the time, the women’s interest site, due to its audience composition, was most successful at delivering the intended audience.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ocr-wire-effectiveness.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29857" title="ocr-wire-effectiveness" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ocr-wire-effectiveness.png" alt="ocr-wire-effectiveness" width="575" height="322" /></a></p>
<p>For more on this case study, download the report, <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/building-brands-in-a-cross-platform-world.html">Building Brands in a Cross-Platform World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Announces Finalists for Automotive Green Marketer of the Year</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chevrolet, Ford, Honda, Toyota and Hyundai are the finalists for the 2nd annual Nielsen Automotive Green Marketer of the Year award. The award recognizes the brand that made the greatest strides in gaining consumer awareness and positively shifting consumer perceptions for the automotive industry’s environmentally friendly initiatives. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevrolet, Ford, Honda, Toyota and Hyundai are the finalists for the 2nd annual Nielsen Automotive Green Marketer of the Year award, which will be presented at the <a href="http://www.laautoshow.com/" target="_blank">Los Angeles International Auto Show</a> on November 17, 2011. The award recognizes the brand that made the greatest strides in gaining consumer awareness and positively impacting consumer perceptions around the automotive industry’s environmentally friendly initiatives.</p>
<p>Nielsen research shows that green marketing by auto companies continues to have a positive effect on consumer perceptions with 51 percent of consumers reporting that green marketing initiatives increased their consideration of the product. This is up 24 percent compared to 2010. Social media discussion about auto makers’ green marketing initiatives has also been more positive this year with a 44 percent increase in positive discussion versus 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/green-auto3.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29868 alignnone" title="green-auto" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/green-auto3.png" alt="green-auto" width="352" height="589" /></a></p>
<p>“Our research identifies how effective auto manufacturers are in raising awareness of their green products, initiatives, and innovations,” said Lois Miller, President, Nielsen Global Automotive. “We can then understand if they were able to change perceptions and consideration in a positive way among consumers.”</p>
<p>“We are thrilled that Nielsen Automotive has again chosen the Los Angeles Auto Show to host its increasingly important Green Marketer of the Year Award,” said Brendan Flynn, Director of Communications for the Los Angeles Auto Show. “Nielsen’s award provides an accurate and important gauge for auto makers and makes a perfect addition to the green story at the LA Show.”</p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
To determine the finalists and winner, Nielsen leveraged three research studies to incorporate awareness levels and perceptions across media types. The studies included:</p>
<ul>
<li>A custom survey of nearly 7,000 consumers’ cross-media awareness and perceptions of environmental messages by automotive brand</li>
<li>Response data from 2.5 million viewers of national television advertising collected by Nielsen’s ad effectiveness measurements service, focusing on green automotive ads</li>
<li>Measuring social media “buzz” sentiment within green-related discussion threads</li>
</ul>
<p>Auto manufacturers that ran any national TV ads with “green” themes between October 2010 and September 2011 were eligible for consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Mall Goers are also Avid Online Shoppers and Media Consumers</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/american-mall-goers-are-also-avid-online-shoppers-and-media-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/american-mall-goers-are-also-avid-online-shoppers-and-media-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Screen Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place-based advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because someone shops in a mall this holiday season doesn’t mean they won’t be shopping online as well. In fact, mall goers are incredibly active consumers across a number of sectors, including media, retail goods, online, travel and automotive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because someone shops in a mall this holiday season doesn’t mean they won’t be shopping online as well. In fact, mall goers are incredibly active consumers across a number of sectors, including media, retail goods, online, travel and automotive according to a recent look by Nielsen and <a href="http://www.scarborough.com" target="_blank">Scarborough</a> into the behaviors of visitors to major malls in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York .</p>
<p>The analysis coincides with the release of Nielsen’s Fourth Screen Network Audience Report for Q2 2011, which measures the impact of advertising in places like malls, movie theaters, gas stations, bars and more. The report included audience measurement for three U.S. mall advertising video networks and found that malls attract a younger, predominantly female audience than other place-based ad networks. In fact, among consumers 18+, mall video networks attract the highest percentage of female viewers (57%) of any tracked location-based network genre, and the majority of mall viewers (55%) fall within the 18-34 demographic. Incidentally, more than one-fifth of tracked mall goers are aged 12 to 17.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mall-4th-screen.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29610" title="mall-4th-screen" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mall-4th-screen.gif" alt="mall-4th-screen" width="575" height="617" /></a></p>
<p>“Malls represent a shopper’s dream come true, and they might offer the same for advertisers,” said Paul Lindstrom, SVP for Nielsen’s On Location service. “Not only is their audience unique from other location-based networks but also they are more likely to spend and engage across the board outside of the mall.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/american-mall-goers-are-also-avid-online-shoppers-and-media-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Ad Spend Rises 5.7% for Q2 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-ad-spend-rises-5-7-for-q2-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-ad-spend-rises-5-7-for-q2-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global advertising spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite overall growth of 5.7 percent for the advertising industry in Q2 2011, ad spending fell in nearly half the world’s key markets in the second quarter of this year as economic concerns continued to impact the advertising industry, according to Nielsen’s quarterly Global AdView Pulse report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite overall growth of 5.7 percent for the advertising industry in Q2 2011, ad spending fell in nearly half the world’s key markets in the second quarter of this year as economic concerns continued to impact the advertising industry, according to Nielsen’s quarterly <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/press-room/2011/global-ad-spend-up-in-q2-2011.html" target="_blank">Global AdView Pulse </a>report.</p>
<p>“Compared to the 8.9 percent growth rate in the first quarter of the year, there was definitely some slowdown,” observed Randall Beard, Global Head of Advertiser Solutions for Nielsen. “But, based on the global economy and the financial problems many countries have experienced, a 5.7 percent increase for quarterly year-on-year global ad spend is still great news.”</p>
<p>Global advertising in Q2 totaled USD127 billion (mainly based on published rate cards and four major media types), and the first half of 2011 closed with a +7.2 percent growth over the same period in 2010.</p>
<p>Highlights from Nielsen’s <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/press-room/2011/global-ad-spend-up-in-q2-2011.html">Global AdView Pulse</a> report:</p>
<ul>
<li>Advertising revenue dropped in 16 out of 36 global markets covered by the Nielsen Global AdView Pulse</li>
<li>Argentina reported the highest year-on-year quarterly increase of 28.5 percent.  Egypt was the hardest hit (-51.7% YOY)</li>
<li>Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) advertising posted its lowest quarterly growth since the Q1 2009 Pulse report: 4 percent globally including declines of -3.6 percent in Europe and -3.0 percent in North America.</li>
<li>Clothing and accessories, which was among the worst hit recession categories in 2009, posted the highest quarterly year-on-year increase in Q2 – up 17.9 percent globally, driven by a 27.9 percent increase in Asia Pacific.</li>
<li>While radio posted the largest percentage increase among all traditional media in Q2 (+8.2%), overall television continued to dominate global advertising, accounting for 65 percent of total spend.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-ad-spend-rises-5-7-for-q2-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

