<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; advertising spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/advertising-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Malaysian Media Buoyed by 16% Rise in Ad Spending in 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/malaysian-media-buoyed-by-16-rise-in-ad-spending-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/malaysian-media-buoyed-by-16-rise-in-ad-spending-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising spending in Malaysia posted solid growth in 2010, posting a 16 percent increase for the year and totaling RM 7.7 billion (more than US$2.5 billion), according to a new report from The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising spending in Malaysia posted solid growth in 2010, posting a 16 percent increase for the year and totaling RM 7.7 billion (more than US$2.5 billion), according to a new report from The Nielsen Company. This growth was broad-based, with TV increasing 18 percent, newspapers up 14 percent, radio up 13 percent and magazines posting 9 percent growth. Beyond traditional media, advertising in-store, outdoors, in cinemas and on the Internet all posted solid increases as well (43%, 7%, 6% and 29%, respectively). This growth in advertising comes in conjunction with an increase in consumer confidence in the country: Malaysian consumers were among the most confident in the world by the fourth quarter of the year, with a score of 107 as calculated by Nielsen’s Consumer Confidence Index.</p>
<p>“With the jump in consumer confidence last year, advertisers joined in the race to capture opportunities that came from improved consumer sentiment. Large-scale events such as the World Cup, promotion for local festivals and aggressive product promotions also boosted advertising spend and led to a strong finish for the year,” said Danyal Abdul Malik, Managing Director, Nielsen Audience Measurement, The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>Newspapers continued to attract the bulk of total ad spending, capturing 51 percent of all Ringgit spent and totaled RM 3.9 billion. Top spenders in the broadsheets were hypermarkets, local governments, universities and furniture retailers.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Ad Spending by Media</th>
<th colspan="2"> 2009</th>
<th colspan="2"> 2010</th>
<th> Y-O-Y Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th> (RM’000)</th>
<th> Share (%)</th>
<th> (RM’000)</th>
<th> Share (%)</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Newspapers</td>
<td>3,407,826</td>
<td>51.5</td>
<td>3,890,824</td>
<td>50.8</td>
<td>14.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>TV</td>
<td>2,446,536</td>
<td>37.0</td>
<td>2,892,472</td>
<td>37.7</td>
<td>18.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Radio</td>
<td>361,818</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>408,871</td>
<td>5.3</td>
<td>13.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Magazines</td>
<td>139,545</td>
<td>2.1</td>
<td>151,735</td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outdoor</td>
<td>112,250</td>
<td>1.7</td>
<td>119,745</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>In-store</td>
<td>86,300</td>
<td>1.3</td>
<td>123,620</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>43.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internet</td>
<td>40,446</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>52,149</td>
<td>0.7</td>
<td>28.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cinema</td>
<td>22,496</td>
<td>0.3</td>
<td>23,811</td>
<td>0.3</td>
<td>5.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total</td>
<td>6,617,217</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>7,663,227</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>15.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="6">Source: The Nielsen Company. P2+ viewership, based on live + same day data</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>The total spent on TV advertising was RM 2.9 billion, driven by increases in categories such as laundry detergent, hair shampoo and conditioner, bath additives, fast food and hair care. Radio advertising spend hit RM 409 million, as players in banking/finance, university, automotive, non-alcoholic beverages as well as newspapers and magazines stepped up promotional activities in 2010. The main contributors to the jump in in-store advertising were growth categories such as laundry detergent, snacks and credit cards, while phone and accessories, mobile line services and real estate agent categories fueled the growth in Internet advertising growth.</p>
<p>On a category basis, mobile phone services pushed into first place in 2010, with local governments, women’s facial care, hair shampoo and conditioners and fast food restaurants rounding out the top five.  Laundry detergent posted the highest growth during the year, up 61 percent in 2010 from the year before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/malaysian-media-buoyed-by-16-rise-in-ad-spending-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen China Forum: China Ad Spending Growth Slows in Third Quarter</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-ad-spending-growth-slows-in-third-quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-ad-spending-growth-slows-in-third-quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen China Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese advertising spending increased 3% in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the previous quarter, and 7% compared to year ago, reaching 175 billion RMB.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese advertising spending in third quarter 2010 increased 3% compared to the previous quarter and 7% compared to year ago, reaching 175 billion RMB. This rate of increase, however, slowed considerably after showing double-digit increases in the previous two quarters. The slowdown can be attributed to a number of factors including the effects of the expiration of domestic stimulus policies and sluggish economic conditions in other parts of the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/china-ad-spending-trends-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25377" title="china-ad-spending-trends-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/china-ad-spending-trends-1.png" alt="china-ad-spending-trends-1" width="551" height="354" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Top 10 Total Ad Spending Industries (TV/Newspaper/Magazine/Radio)</strong><br />
While total ad spending (combined TV, Newspaper, Magazine and Radio) in the toiletries, beverages and pharmaceuticals industries topped the list for the biggest quarterly outlay, the automotive industry tops the list for the biggest year-over-year increase of 37%. Ad spending in the Foodstuffs, Retail &amp; Service and Household industries are also showing healthy increases compared to year ago spending.</p>
<p>The pharmaceutical industry decreased spending in quarters one and two, down 11% and 2% respectively, due largely to a cutback on television advertisements.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/china-ad-spending-trends-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25378" title="china-ad-spending-trends-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/china-ad-spending-trends-2.png" alt="china-ad-spending-trends-2" width="565" height="343" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Top 10s by Advertising Sector</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Top 10 TV Advertising Spending Industries</th>
<th>Ad Spend (Million RMB)</th>
<th>Year-Over-Year</th>
<th>Quarter-over-Quarter</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Toiletries</td>
<td>27,560</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Beverage</td>
<td>23,091</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-13%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Pharmaceutical &amp; Health Product</td>
<td>19,871</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-12%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-1%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Business/Industrial/Agriculture</td>
<td>14,257</td>
<td>6%</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Foodstuffs</td>
<td>11,128</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Retail &amp; Service</td>
<td>6,734</td>
<td>23%</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Household</td>
<td>6,649</td>
<td>17%</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-10%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Automotives</td>
<td>5,210</td>
<td>39%</td>
<td>10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Telecommunication</td>
<td>3,467</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-26%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-7%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Clothing &amp; Accessories</td>
<td>3,288</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-13%</span></td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="2">Others</td>
<td>18,333</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Top 10 Newspaper Advertising Spending Industries</th>
<th>Ad Spend (Million RMB)</th>
<th>Year-Over-Year</th>
<th>Quarter-over-Quarter</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Property</td>
<td>5,508</td>
<td>1%</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Retail &amp; Service</td>
<td>4,333</td>
<td>23%</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Automotives</td>
<td>2,705</td>
<td>33%</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pharmaceutical &amp; Health Product</td>
<td>1,704</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-4%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-12%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Business/Industrial/Agriculture</td>
<td>1,671</td>
<td>8%</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Household</td>
<td>986</td>
<td>26%</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Travel/Transport</td>
<td>971</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Beverage</td>
<td>678</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Government, Social, Political Organizations</td>
<td>656</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-1%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-5%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Finance/Investment/Banking</td>
<td>647</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="2">Others</td>
<td>9,053</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-13%</span></td>
<td>3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Top 10 Magazine Advertising Spending Industries</th>
<th>Ad Spend (Million RMB)</th>
<th>Year-Over-Year</th>
<th>Quarter-over-Quarter</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Toiletries</td>
<td>5,508</td>
<td>1%</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Clothing &amp; Accessories</td>
<td>4,333</td>
<td>23%</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Automotives</td>
<td>2,705</td>
<td>33%</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Beverage</td>
<td>1,704</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-4%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-12%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Computeres &amp; Acessories</td>
<td>1,671</td>
<td>8%</td>
<td>6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Household</td>
<td>986</td>
<td>26%</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Travel/Transport</td>
<td>971</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Property</td>
<td>678</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Electrical Appliances / AV Products</td>
<td>656</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-1%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-5%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Pharmaceutical &amp; Health Product</td>
<td>647</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="2">Others</td>
<td>9,053</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-13%</span></td>
<td>3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>&#8211;></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Top 10 Radio Advertising Spending Industries</th>
<th>Ad Spend (Million RMB)</th>
<th>Year-Over-Year</th>
<th>Quarter-over-Quarter</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Automotives</td>
<td>553</td>
<td>72%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Retail &amp; Service</td>
<td>329</td>
<td>24%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Finance/Investment/Banking</td>
<td>329</td>
<td>40%</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pharmaceutical &amp; Health Product</td>
<td>237</td>
<td>24%</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-5%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Telecommunication</td>
<td>229</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Beverage</td>
<td>196</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-1%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-12%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Entertainment &amp; Media</td>
<td>182</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-19%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-1%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Property</td>
<td>178</td>
<td>45%</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-4%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Business/Industrial/Agriculture</td>
<td>152</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Household</td>
<td>107</td>
<td>47%</td>
<td><span style="color: red;">-2%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis" colspan="2">Others</td>
<td>438</td>
<td>4%</td>
<td>14%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/china-ad-spending-growth-slows-in-third-quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Marketers Re-think Animated TV Ads During the Holidays?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/should-marketers-re-think-animated-tv-ads-during-the-holidays/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/should-marketers-re-think-animated-tv-ads-during-the-holidays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With shopping season and holiday ads in full swing, new Nielsen research looks at viewer engagement for commercials that use animation vs. live action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With shopping season in full swing, advertisers are rolling out their holiday-themed ads, many of which are sure to feature a cartoon reindeer or other festive animated character.</p>
<p>While the many benefits of using animation in TV ads are clear, new research from The Nielsen Company suggests that, although marketers have a lot to gain with animated ads, they may be sacrificing audience engagement with commercials that don’t resonate as well with savvy consumers. </p>
<p>With rapid advances in technology, the use of animation in television advertising (vs. live action ads) has become an attractive option for marketers. Animation frees advertisers from many of the creative limitations of live action film – such as location constraints and the task of securing actors – while often times providing significant cost savings. </p>
<p>However, in an analysis of television ads across all product categories, Nielsen found that, in general, live action ads were more effective than animation ads. For all major categories, live action ads scored 22 percent higher than animation-only ads in Brand Recall (the percentage of TV viewers who can recall the commercial and its advertised brand 24 hours after viewing it).</p>
<p>Live action creatives were more effective than animated ads across all major demographics as well.  While live action ads resonated equally among both genders, Brand Recall was 27 percent stronger for females and 17 percent stronger among males than for animated ads.  Adults 35 to 49 saw a 24 percent increase in brand recall for ads that used live action vs. animated. The gap shrunk, however, among viewers aged 13 to 35, who only showed an 11% change between live action and animated creatives.  </p>
<p>When looking at consumer packaged goods (CPG) specifically, ads in the personal care category appeared to struggle the most when using animation. For certain personal care products, brand recall was twice as high among spots using live action vs. an animated theme.</p>
<p>There is a bright spot, however, for marketers looking to utilize animated advertising to drive grocery sales this holiday season, as that creative style does seem to work more effectively for some CPG categories. For example, animation ads for the food ingredients and seasoning category – essential for every holiday dinner – resonated significantly better with consumers. Brand recall for these categories was 28 percent higher for animation ads vs. live action. </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/animated-vs-live.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-25150" title="animated-vs-live" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/animated-vs-live.png" alt="animated-vs-live" width="565" height="322" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/should-marketers-re-think-animated-tv-ads-during-the-holidays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restaurants Serve Up Ads in 2009, Plus Top Cities for Growth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Claritas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Service Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant Growth Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While advertising as a whole took a hit in 2009, the nation’s Quick Service Restaurants ramped up spending during the year by 2% over 2008, according to The Nielsen Company. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While advertising as a whole took a hit in 2009, the nation’s Quick Service Restaurants ramped up spending during the year by 2% over 2008, according to The Nielsen Company.  Fast food restaurants spent almost $4.1 billion during the year, with nearly 36% being spent on Spot TV, followed by Network and Cable TV.</p>
<p>The sector spent $84.7 million on African-American media during the year, and increase of 18% from the year before, cable TV showed significant growth – up 42% &#8212; while network TV dropped more than 70%.</p>
<p><strong>Top 10 Media Types for Quick Service Restaurant Advertising</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Media Type</th>
<th>Jan-Dec 2009 ($ millions)</th>
<th>% of Total Ad Spending</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot TV 210 DMAs</td>
<td>1,475.5</td>
<td>36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network TV</td>
<td>934.8</td>
<td>23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cable TV</td>
<td>868.3</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spanish Language Network TV</td>
<td>203.0</td>
<td>5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Spot Radio</td>
<td>183.2</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Outdoor</td>
<td>149.0</td>
<td>4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">National Magazine</td>
<td>84.2</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Syndicated TV</td>
<td>80.0</td>
<td>2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Internet</td>
<td>58.9</td>
<td>1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Network Radio</td>
<td>18.1</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the Wait Service side of dining, ad spend fell 4% in 2009 to $1.56 billion.  More than a quarter of that was spent on Network TV, followed by Spot and Cable TV.  &#8220;Local Newspapers&#8221; was the fourth largest category, with $124 million being spent, compared to just $14.8 million in that category for quick service restaurants.  For Wait Service Restaurants, all categories – except for cable TV – registered a decline in spending during the year.</p>
<p><strong>Top Cities for Restaurants</strong><br />
Meanwhile, Nielsen Claritas released its annual Restaurant Growth Index (RGI) report, which found that the top city for dining out was Fort Walton Beach, Florida, which scored an RGI of 577, beating Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which claimed the top spot for the past two years.  Despite leading the pack, Fort Walton Beach’s score was well below Myrtle Beach’s scores for the previous two years (735 and 632) reflecting the economic turmoil in 2009.  The average index score among markets in the top 10 was off 40 points from the previous year.  Nationally, restaurant sales fell more than $5 billion in 2009, which translates to both diminished sales per capita and per restaurant outlet.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Metro Area</th>
<th>RGI</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Fort Walton Beach, FL</td>
<td>577</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Myrtle Beach, SC</td>
<td>469</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Ocean City, NJ</td>
<td>411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ</td>
<td>330</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Flagstaff, AZ</td>
<td>329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Honolulu, HI</td>
<td>308</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Las Vegas-Paradise, NV</td>
<td>296</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Barnstable Town, MA</td>
<td>278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Springfield, IL</td>
<td>274</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Jackson, TN</td>
<td>274</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The RGI tends to favor markets with significant number of out-of-town visitors, such as vacation destinations and college towns.  Springfield, Illinois may be the most surprising entrant to the list, but if one considers the fact that it is a state capital with a large number of state employees, legislators and lobbyists need somewhere to eat, its inclusion makes more sense.</p>
<p>“Obviously, the economy has had a significant effect on the restaurant industry as money-conscious consumers cooked dinner and ate at home more frequently.  But there were a number of markets that were bucking the trend with annual sales increases during the year, notably Barnstable Town on Cape Cod, which jumped into the number eight position, and Napa, California, which climbed 20 spots to number twelve after having fallen to 32<sup>nd</sup> place last year,” said Matt Wolff, AVP, Retail Practice Manager at Nielsen Claritas.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/0410-FEAT_RGI_150.pdf">full article</a> from Restaurant Business magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/restaurants-serve-up-ads-in-2009-plus-top-cities-for-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Recalled Drug Commercials Are not the Biggest Spenders</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending the most doesn’t necessarily equate to efficiency in viewer recollection. Nielsen IAG found that the top four most memorable Pharma TV commercials in 2009 did not spend the most on their respective campaigns. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although spending for pharmaceutical drug advertising on TV is not at the level it used to be, the investment by marketers in this space remained stable with a 0.6% increase in 2009 expenditures on national TV compared to 2008, according to The Nielsen Company.  With six of the top 10 brands spending more than $100M on national broadcast, cable, and syndicated TV ads, the cholesterol reducing drug Lipitor had the largest expenditure in 2009.  Erectile dysfunction drug Cialis by maker Eli Lilly was the second-highest spender followed by Abilify, an add-on treatment for depression from Bristol-Meyers Squibb.  Despite the recession, the top 10 prescription brand spenders invested $1.1 billion on national TV commercials, compared to $1.0 billion in 2008.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">TOP 10 RX BRANDS &#8212; TV EXPENDITURE 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Lipitor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Abilify</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Cymbalta</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Plavix</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Symbicort</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Lyrica</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Advair</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Viagra</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Crestor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Spending the most doesn’t necessarily equate to efficiency in viewer recollection, however.  In fact, new research released by Nielsen IAG found that the top four most memorable TV commercials which launched in 2009 included brands that did not spend the most on their respective campaigns in 2009. The two most recalled ads for Flomax promoted awareness of BPH treatment, followed by the HPV vaccine Gardasil and newcomer, anti-depressant Pristiq – were not among the year’s largest spenders for TV advertising by a long-shot.</p>
<p><strong>2009 Most Recalled Prescription Drug/Vaccine Ads</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Length (seconds)</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>45 &amp; 60</td>
<td>141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>45 &amp; 60</td>
<td>139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Gardasil</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pristiq</td>
<td>75</td>
<td>135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Aricept</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Orencia</td>
<td>75</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Plavix</td>
<td>60 &amp; 75</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Viagra</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>“As with any category of advertising on TV today challenged with the need to cut-through the clutter and drive awareness and ultimately, persuade target viewers to take action, creativity and clarity are essential ingredients for effective and efficient ad development and deployment.  Pharmaceutical drug ads are not exempt from this challenge,” said Fariba Zamaniyan, Senior Vice President within the healthcare practice of Nielsen IAG.</p>
<p>While TV spending for prescription drug advertising has declined over the years, a number of factors contributed to that decline: fewer drug launches, the economic downturn and the increasing scrutiny by the FDA for prescription drug ads to increase the clarity of the delivery of product claim information in the ads. Stricter guidelines have forced an increase in ad length for many prescription advertisers which has resulted in extended ad lengths and ultimately, higher costs. In fact, the number of Rx ads that are greater than 60 seconds in length has nearly tripled since from 2006 to 2009.</p>
<p>“Longer ad lengths has further compounded the pressure marketers in this space already feel to build break-through advertising,” said Ms. Zamaniyan.  “However, longer length ads do not drop the bar when it comes to achieving goals.  Several ads in the top 10 most recalled new ads of 2009 include ad lengths greater than 60 seconds which further demonstrates that compelling and unique creative executions will help you stand out from the rest even if the ad is more than one-minute long.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Ad Spend Falls Nine Percent in 2009, Nielsen Says</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-ad-spend-falls-nine-percent-in-2009-nielsen-says/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-ad-spend-falls-nine-percent-in-2009-nielsen-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrie Brennan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. ad spending was down for the sixth straight quarter, despite signs that the decline is slowing, according to preliminary figures released today by The Nielsen Company.  All told, advertisers spent an estimated $117 billion on U.S. media in 2009, down 9% from 2008.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. ad spending was down for the sixth straight quarter, despite signs that the decline is slowing, according to preliminary figures released today by The Nielsen Company.  All told, advertisers spent an estimated $117 billion on U.S. media in 2009, down 9% from 2008.</p>
<p>Thanks in part to a relatively strong fourth quarter, the 9% decline was an improvement from the pace of ad spending reported earlier in the year.  Spending was down 15.4% through the first six months of 2009 and 11.5% after the first three quarters.</p>
<p>“Fourth quarter ad spending was down just two percent year-over-year, and that helped soften the full-year decline,” said Terrie Brennan, senior VP for new business development at The Nielsen Company. “In fact, most of the top advertisers showed increased spending late in the year. These are encouraging signs for an ad market that’s still trying to stop the bleeding.”</p>
<p>Spanish Language Cable TV (+32.2%) and Cable TV (+14.8%) stood out as the top-gaining media in 2009. Free-Standing Insert Coupon (+11.5) was the only other medium to show significant year-over-year growth. Internet (+0.1%) remained essentially flat.</p>
<p>Spending by the top ten product categories was down 9.5% in 2009. The automotive industry was the top category with over $8 billion spent last year. Pharmaceutical, Quick Service Restaurants, and Department Stores were next on the list, with each category showing year-over-year gains.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>PRODUCT CATEGORY</th>
<th>2009 AD SPEND (millions)</th>
<th>2008 AD SPEND (millions)</th>
<th>% CHANGE</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Automotive (Factory &amp; Dealer Assoc.)</td>
<td>$8,039.1</td>
<td>$10,491.6</td>
<td>-23.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Pharmaceutical</td>
<td>$4,504.6</td>
<td>$4,424.6</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Quick Service Restaurant</td>
<td>$4,068.5</td>
<td>$4,014.9</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Department Stores</td>
<td>$4,066.3</td>
<td>$3,956.0</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wireless Telephone Services</td>
<td>$3,386.2</td>
<td>$3,689.8</td>
<td>-8.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Motion Picture</td>
<td>$3,368.4</td>
<td>$3,414.0</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Auto Dealerships &#8211; Local</td>
<td>$3,227.2</td>
<td>$4,188.6</td>
<td>-23.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Direct Response Products</td>
<td>$2,465.8</td>
<td>$2,582.9</td>
<td>-4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Restaurants</td>
<td>$1,557.6</td>
<td>$1,615.0</td>
<td>-3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Furniture Stores</td>
<td>$1,437.5</td>
<td>$1,553.1</td>
<td>-7.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis"> </td>
<td><strong>TOP 10 TOTAL </strong></td>
<td><strong>$36,121.2 </strong></td>
<td><strong>$39,930.5 </strong></td>
<td><strong>-9.5%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source : The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Download Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2009-Year-End-Ad-Spend-Press-Release.pdf">2009 Year End Ad Spend Press Release</a><br />
<!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-ad-spend-falls-nine-percent-in-2009-nielsen-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vietnamese Business Leaders Express Economic Optimism</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vietnamese-business-leaders-express-economic-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vietnamese-business-leaders-express-economic-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=18094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vietnam’s business leaders expect to return to double-digit growth in 2010, according to the latest edition of the Nielsen Vietnam’s Business Barometer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 has been a challenging year for businesses around the world.  But some countries have weathered the economic tsunami better than others, and with recovery beginning to take shape around the work, Vietnam’s business leaders expect to return to double-digit growth in 2010, according to the latest edition of the Nielsen Vietnam’s Business Barometer.</p>
<p>“It will be quite a stretch for business leaders to expect double-digit growth when Vietnam’s 2010 GDP is estimated to be at a modest 5.5 percent,” said Vaughan Ryan, Director at The Nielsen Company Vietnam.  “But the sentiment shared by business leaders shows that there is good momentum among many industries, especially fast moving consumer goods, and they’ve planned well to ride out the recession and even see growth where many businesses are copping losses.”</p>
<p>Competitive pressure and growth targets are business leaders’ top concerns, with 68 percent, followed by the ability to pass on price increases (45%), inflation (42%) and low GDP growth (31%).  More than two-thirds (70%) believe business conditions have improved versus a year a go, in contrast to just 40 percent who said the same in the March edition of the survey.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/vietnam_barometer.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18129" title="vietnam_barometer" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/vietnam_barometer.png" alt="vietnam_barometer" width="575" height="410" /></a></p>
<p>While there has been a lot of talk over the past year about the move towards premium products and services by the increasingly-affluent Vietnamese, 48 percent of business leaders believe that consumers will move towards purchasing on promotion and 31 percent believe consumers will “trade down” to cheaper products over the next six to twelve months.</p>
<p>Many businesses around the world focus on urban consumers, however in Vietnam, appealing to rural consumers – who make up more than 70 percent of the total population – is critical to renewed growth.  Almost 80 percent of businesses claim that they will look to the rural markets to further growth compared to 64 percent in the previous edition of the survey.</p>
<p>“Unlike the rest of the world, rural Vietnam is in many cases growing faster than urban areas.  It’s crucial for businesses to have a strong presence there.  In some cases, rural value growth rates has surpassed urban by as much as 9 percent versus a year ago in certain consumer goods categories,” said Ryan.</p>
<p>As a result of this optimism, advertising spending is expected to post a strong increase.  Half of all business leaders surveyed said they expected to increase ad spend (up from 39% in March).  All media are likely to benefit – TV (29%), point-of-sale materials (55%), print (27%), in-store banners (44%) and outdoor posters (20%).  Most notably, business is expected to increase ad spend online by 54 percent over the next six to twelve months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/vietnamese-business-leaders-express-economic-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multi-Cultural Ad Spending Sees Declines in First Half of 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/multi-cultural-ad-spending-sees-declines-in-first-half-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/multi-cultural-ad-spending-sees-declines-in-first-half-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[african-american advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Service Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish language advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless phone services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=17292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new analysis of multi-cultural advertising indicates that ad spending declined in Spanish-Language and African-American media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new analysis of multi-cultural advertising indicates that ad spending in Spanish-Language media for the 12-month period of July 2008 to June 2009 was over $5.5 billion, a 6.3 percent decline over the previous 12 months. Over the same time period, African-American ad spending fell 9.6% to $1.8 billion.</p>
<p>Automotive was still the largest spending product category  for Spanish-Language media ($381.7 million), despite a 40 percent cut in spending compared to the previous 12 months. Wireless Telephone Services (+4.8%), Quick Service Restaurants (+10.1%) and Direct Response Products (+18.1%) each saw an increase in Spanish-Language ad spend and fell within the top five product categories.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TOP 5 SPANISH-LANGUAGE MEDIA AD SPENDERS, PRODUCT CATEGORIES</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>PRODUCT CATEGORY</th>
<th>Q308-Q209 (millions)</th>
<th>Q307-Q208 (millions)</th>
<th>CHANGE</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Automotive (Factory &amp; Dealer Associations)</td>
<td>$381.7</td>
<td>$640.6</td>
<td>-40.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Wireless Telephone Services</td>
<td>$334.8</td>
<td>$319.5</td>
<td>4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Quick Service Restaurant</td>
<td>$322.8</td>
<td>$293.1</td>
<td>10.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Department Stores</td>
<td>$291.2</td>
<td>$299.6</td>
<td>-2.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Direct Response Products</td>
<td>$234.3</td>
<td>$198.3</td>
<td>18.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Automotive&#8217;s African-American media budget saw a 33.5 percent plunge compared to the previous 12 months, even as it continued to top all other product categories. Quick Service Restaurants (-6.4%), Department Stores (-20.1%), Motion Pictures (-20%), and Wireless Telephone Services (-16.7%) rounded out the top five African-American ad spenders, despite each chopping their ad budgets.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TOP 5 AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEDIA AD SPENDERS, PRODUCT CATEGORIES</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>RANK</th>
<th>PRODUCT CATEGORY</th>
<th>Q308-Q209 (millions)</th>
<th>Q307-Q208 (millions)</th>
<th>CHANGE</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Automotive (Factory &amp; Dealer Associations)</td>
<td>$82.6</td>
<td>$124.2</td>
<td>-33.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Quick Service Restaurants</td>
<td>$72.4</td>
<td>$77.4</td>
<td>-6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Department Stores</td>
<td>$62.3</td>
<td>$78.0</td>
<td>-20.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Motion Picture</td>
<td>$53.3</td>
<td>$66.7</td>
<td>-20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wireless Telephone Svcs</td>
<td>$50.6</td>
<td>$60.7</td>
<td>-16.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Download Nielsen&#8217;s full report on <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MultiCulturalSpotlight10.23.09.pdf">Multi-Cultural ad spending</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/multi-cultural-ad-spending-sees-declines-in-first-half-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Ad Spending Down 6.2%</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-ad-spending-down-6-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-ad-spending-down-6-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=16066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia’s advertising sector appears to have avoided the worst of the ongoing shockwaves of the global financial crisis, although the impact on ad spending was significantly more severe across main media in the second half of the financial year...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia’s advertising sector appears to have avoided the worst of the ongoing shockwaves of the global financial crisis, although the impact on ad spending was significantly more severe across main media in the second half of the financial year (January to June 2009) according to Nielsen’s Top Media Advertisers report for 08/09.</p>
<p>“While most overseas advertising markets were already in meltdown by mid 2008, the impact was not clearly evident in Australia until later in the year. When consumer and business confidence was declining in late November and exports /commodities trading were drying up, rapidly softening economic conditions led to more cutbacks in jobs, and for many organisations, forensic cutbacks in advertising activity,” said Peter Cornelius, Managing Director Media for The Nielsen Company Pacific.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, main media ad spend activity reflected this spiralling demand trend, with the financial year finishing an estimated 6.2% behind the corresponding period in 07/08.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">However, the 08/09 financial year was really a tale of two halves</span>. The first half (July – Dec ‘08) was down only 2.3% on the same period in 2007. The second half of the financial year (Jan -Jun ‘09) took the full brunt of the economic downturn with a decrease of almost 11% versus the same period in 2008. It is this ‘low’ base the industry will be watching very closely as media trading improves in line with the much anticipated future economic recovery.</p>
<p><strong>Ad Spending in Australia&#8217;s main media, FY 08/09 vs. FY 07/08</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>FTA Television</th>
<th>Metro/Re Newspapers</th>
<th>Magazines</th>
<th>Radio</th>
<th>Cinema</th>
<th>Outdoor</th>
<th>Direct Mail</th>
<th>Online</th>
<th>% Diff YOY</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">FY 08/09</td>
<td>3,542</td>
<td>3,086</td>
<td>1,068</td>
<td>604</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>438</td>
<td>258</td>
<td>474</td>
<td>-6.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">FY 07/08</td>
<td>3,784</td>
<td>3,288</td>
<td>1,123</td>
<td>623</td>
<td>78</td>
<td>479</td>
<td>280</td>
<td>192</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="10">Source: The Nielsen Company Australia ~ Top Media Advertisers Report Fiscal 08/09</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span id="more-16066"></span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Major Advertising Categories Overview</strong></p>
<p>The top 10 Major advertising categories account for 71 cents in every main media ad dollar invested and provide vital indicators on the health of the advertising and media markets.</p>
<p>This is particularly significant when reviewing retail, Australia’s largest category which accounted for more than 21percent share of media spending. The Government’s stimulus packages in early 2009 helped renew confidence among retailer advertisers who promoted heavily to encourage consumer sales. Remarkably, in this economic downturn, retail advertising recorded a minimal 1.1 percent decline YOY to $2 billion.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>08/09 Rank</th>
<th>Australia&#8217;s Top 10 Ad Categories</th>
<th>AUD$M</th>
<th>YoY %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Retail</td>
<td>2,034.1</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Motor Vehicles</td>
<td>1,036.5</td>
<td>-6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Entertainment &amp; Leisure</td>
<td>759.4</td>
<td>-2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Real Estate</td>
<td>549.6</td>
<td>-6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Finance</td>
<td>543.7</td>
<td>-17.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Travel/Accommodation</td>
<td>518.3</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Food</td>
<td>371.4</td>
<td>-4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Communications</td>
<td>338.9</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Media</td>
<td>294.8</td>
<td>-2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Recruitment</td>
<td>287.2</td>
<td>-34.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company Pacific</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Australia’s Top Advertiser Groups / Advertisers Overview</strong></p>
<p>The Top 25 advertisers accounted for 21 cents of every main media advertising dollar invested in the financial year. The sectors which were most representative of this elite group of advertisers were Retailers (5), FMCG (4), Motor Vehicles (4), Governments (4) and Telecommunications (2).</p>
<p>The country’s dominant media advertiser group was Wesfarmers Limited, incorporating some of Australia’s foremost retail chains including Coles Supermarkets, Target, Kmart, Bunning’s Hardware, Officeworks and Liquorland. The group finished the financial year with an estimated $220 million spend, just 2.1percent behind 07/08.</p>
<p>Harvey Holdings was the 2nd ranked top Advertiser and performed strongly in what was considered a difficult year for Retailing and advertising generally. With a 4.6 percent increase to an estimated $135 million spend, the group lifted 2 spots from 4th position last year. Also stepping up two positions was 3rd ranked Woolworths Limited, substantially increasing their main media advertising presence by 8.7 percent to $134 million.</p>
<table class="chart">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>08/09</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191" valign="bottom"><strong> Australia&#8217;s Top 10 Advertisers / </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="105" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong> All Media </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Pos</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191" valign="bottom"><strong> Advertiser Groups </strong></td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>AUD$M </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="42" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>YoY%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>1</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Wesfarmers Limited</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 220.2 </strong></td>
<td width="42">-     2.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>2</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Harvey Holdings Ltd</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 135.2 </strong></td>
<td width="42">4.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>3</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Woolworths Limited</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 133.8 </strong></td>
<td width="42">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>4</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Government Commonwealth</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 133.6 </strong></td>
<td width="42">-  28.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>5</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Telstra Corp Limited</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 129.7 </strong></td>
<td width="42">-  22.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>6</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Nestle Australia/L&#8217;Oreal</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 109.1 </strong></td>
<td width="42">-  10.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>7</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Government Victoria</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 95.0 </strong></td>
<td width="42">11.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>8</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Government NSW</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 84.8 </strong></td>
<td width="42">-  14.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>9</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">Toyota Motor Corporation</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 82.3 </strong></td>
<td width="42">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61">
<p align="center"><strong>10</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="191">SingTel Group</td>
<td width="63"><strong> 80.3 </strong></td>
<td width="42">4.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Will there be an early Australian advertising recovery?</strong></p>
<p>At the time of writing in September 2009, the financial analysts’ debate continues as to whether Australia ever was officially in recession, although strong retail figures suggest that this may have saved the economy from tipping into one. However, Australia’s economy appears to have begun to rebound with greater speed and resilience than most overseas markets. There remains a cautious attitude among media and marketing sectors about a significant recovery before the end of 2009.  However, as our fiscal year ad spend estimates reflect, and taking into account a soft first six months of 2009, advertising activity may need time to recover and rise into the black.</p>
<p>Certainly, our studies support the theory that those who advertised through the tough times have maintained their competitive advantage as the economic climate improves. Marketing dollars spent during a downturn have less competition for eyeballs, so those who cutback may face even bigger challenges winning back consumers’ hearts and minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-ad-spending-down-6-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asia Pacific Advertising Slowdown Hits Hard In 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/asia-pacific-advertising-slowdown-hits-hard-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/asia-pacific-advertising-slowdown-hits-hard-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=13611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall ad spending stayed afloat in Q1 &#8216;09 vs. Q1 ‘08
Toward the end of 2008, the global downturn was adversely impacting advertising spending throughout many key markets around the world, with Europe and the Americas struggling more than others.  The exception to this was Asia Pacific (APAC), which appeared to be relatively impervious to the worst of the downturn. Beginning in late 2008, and escalating as the first quarter of 2009 unfolded, the majority of APAC markets were finally succumbing to declining economic conditions with substantial declines in advertising activity. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overall ad spending stayed afloat in Q1 &#8216;09 vs. Q1 ‘08</strong></p>
<p>Toward the end of 2008, the global downturn was adversely impacting advertising spending throughout many key markets around the world, with Europe and the Americas struggling more than others.  The exception to this was Asia Pacific (APAC), which appeared to be relatively impervious to the worst of the downturn. Beginning in late 2008, and escalating as the first quarter of 2009 unfolded, the majority of APAC markets were finally succumbing to declining economic conditions with substantial declines in advertising activity. Hand-in-hand with consumer confidence declining further in the new year, most APAC countries witnessed substantial ad spend cutbacks; although still not resembling the severity of those experienced in some other regions.</p>
<p>&#8220;While the flow on effect of the financial meltdown on individual countries&#8217; advertising was beginning to bite across several markets late in 2008, it is the sobering results for the first quarter of 2009 which present a clearer picture of how advertising expenditure across the region was faltering. Main media measured across all markets, defined by Nielsen as free to air TV, newspapers and magazines, stalled at 0 percent growth compared to the first quarter of 2008. Even China, the juggernaut of advertising growth globally over recent years, was not immune to the faltering economic outlook, recording just 2 percent growth over the same period in 2008 and recording 17 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2008,&#8221; said Richard Basil-Jones, Managing Director for Asia Pacific, Nielsen Media International.</p>
<p>&#8220;Although six markets recorded declines in the fourth quarter of 2008, overall growth was 10%; however, with nine countries now in decline in 2009, the zero growth in ad spending was not unexpected. On a slightly more positive note, all &#8220;other media&#8221; tracked by Nielsen across various countries (radio, outdoor, pay TV, cinema and other combined) posted an overall 1.3 percent increase in Q1 2009,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p> <strong>Nine countries recorded declines in Q1 &#8216;09 ad spend versus Q1 ‘08:</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Thailand        -1% </li>
<li>Malaysia        -3%</li>
<li>New Zealand  -4%</li>
<li>India             -6%</li>
<li>Australia        -11%</li>
<li>Singapore      -14%</li>
<li>South Korea   -19%</li>
<li>Taiwan          -22%</li>
<li>Hong Kong     -5%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Just three countries showed growth</strong> <strong>in Q1 &#8216;09 ad spend versus Q1 ‘08:</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Indonesia (20%)</li>
<li>China (2%)</li>
<li>Philippines (8%)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Other key findings:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Across the twelve markets monitored, a total of US$23.5 billion was spent on advertising in Q1 ‘09</li>
<li>A total of US$109.16 billion was spent on &#8220;Main Media&#8221; advertising in the 12 months to March ‘09 (+9%) YOY, with television comprising 71 percent of expenditures.</li>
<li>FTA Television ad spending grew 9 percent YOY; with six countries posting double-digit growth as four countries recorded declines.</li>
<li>Newspaper ad spending recorded a modest 2 percent growth YOY, even though the medium experienced declines in six countries.</li>
<li>Magazine ad spending, despite declines in 7 countries, increased 2 percent YOY, with high double digit growth in 4 countries.</li>
<li>Radio dominated the &#8220;all other media&#8221; tracked by Nielsen, with a 51 percent share of spend and a 5 percent increase YOY.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/asia-pacific-advertising-slowdown-hits-hard-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

