<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; advertising effectiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/advertising-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Super Bowl Investment: Ad Spend Trends Over the Past Five Super Bowls</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they get a measurable bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011's Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they tend to get a measurable marketing bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011&#8217;s Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.  In addition, brand awareness for commercials airing during the Super Bowl was up to 275 percent higher than awareness for the same creative during regular programming.</p>
<p><strong>Cost of an Ad</strong><br />
The Super Bowl investment is economically resilient, remaining relatively stable despite fluctuations in the primetime average—and rising consistently over the past five years despite a rocky economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-30807 aligncenter" title="AvgCost-30SecAd" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif" alt="AvgCost-30SecAd" width="278" height="220" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Big Spenders: Automotive Makes a Comeback</strong><br />
2011 was the year of the auto comeback.  Spending on automotive ads far surpassed other categories and more than doubled versus previous years.  Nine different auto brands took center field in the commercial breaks, versus an average of two to four brands in years prior.  Creative quality also improved in 2011, with an unprecedented four auto spots making Nielsen’s annual <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/" target="_self">Most-Liked list</a>.  Chevrolet’s “Wild Ride” garnered the distinction of being the most watched ad of all time, with an estimated 119,628,000 viewers watching its Super Bowl airing.  This year, Chevy is breaking ground again with the Game Time app, which will leverage consumers&#8217; simultaneous cross-screen behavior and reinforce branding from traditional TV advertisements.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Super Bowl Advertising Categories (2007-2011)</strong><br />
Year Over Year Spend Breakdown (in millions)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30808 aligncenter" title="Top5-SBAdCat" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png" alt="Top5-SBAdCat" width="433" height="728" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Other Spend Trends</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Beer</strong>: Bud Light and Budweiser have dominated the turf when if comes to Super Bowl beer advertising over the past five years.  Consumers have come to expect the fleet of creatives, including the iconic Clydesdale ads.  In 2010 and 2011, other brands like Michelob and Stella Artois came to play.  What can viewers expect this year?</li>
<li><strong>Motion Picture</strong>: Movies have a strong presence in Super Bowl ad lineup, as studios capitalize on the massive audience to parade their best bets for the year.  From 2008-2011, at least one of the top five highest grossing films had a slot in the Super Bowl line up.  Motion picture ads increased after 2008 and have had a consistently strong presence during the game since, reaching ten ads in last year’s game.</li>
<li><strong>Regular Soft Drink</strong>: While fewer Soft Drink ads have traditionally aired during the Super Bowl compared to other categories, they make an impact by creating minute-long spots.</li>
<li><strong>Tortilla Chips</strong>:  Tortilla Chips have emerged as a highly anticipated category of ads, led by the fan created ads.   Last year, three Doritos ads made Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">Most Liked and Most Remembered list</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thrill of the Chase: Best-Liked Ads of Q3 2011 Depict Pursuit of Love</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most liked ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Q3 2011, the best-liked TV creatives for men and women were all about the chase, as Nielsen research showed both genders enjoyed ads that represented the often elusive pursuit of love. For women, the most-liked ad was for Chevrolet Cruze Eco in which a man&#8217;s &#8220;Janet Marry Me&#8221; plane banner kept flying behind buildings, foiling his marriage proposal attempts.  Guys also showed their sentimental side; their favorite was a Staples commercial where Rico Rodriguez (known for his role on ABC&#8217;s Modern Family) fails to get a girl&#8217;s phone number with his new pens.</p>
<p>Ads for charitable causes also made their mark on TV viewers in Q3. Overall, MasterCard&#8217;s Stand Up to Cancer ads, featuring Ray Romano, took the top spot.  The Yoplait &#8220;Save Lids to Save Lives&#8221; commercial also popped out as a well-liked ad overall.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29913" title="TopAds" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/TopAds.gif" alt="TopAds" width="575" height="1200" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/thrill-of-the-chase-best-liked-ads-of-q3-2011-depict-pursuit-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Announces Finalists for Automotive Green Marketer of the Year</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chevrolet, Ford, Honda, Toyota and Hyundai are the finalists for the 2nd annual Nielsen Automotive Green Marketer of the Year award. The award recognizes the brand that made the greatest strides in gaining consumer awareness and positively shifting consumer perceptions for the automotive industry’s environmentally friendly initiatives. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevrolet, Ford, Honda, Toyota and Hyundai are the finalists for the 2nd annual Nielsen Automotive Green Marketer of the Year award, which will be presented at the <a href="http://www.laautoshow.com/" target="_blank">Los Angeles International Auto Show</a> on November 17, 2011. The award recognizes the brand that made the greatest strides in gaining consumer awareness and positively impacting consumer perceptions around the automotive industry’s environmentally friendly initiatives.</p>
<p>Nielsen research shows that green marketing by auto companies continues to have a positive effect on consumer perceptions with 51 percent of consumers reporting that green marketing initiatives increased their consideration of the product. This is up 24 percent compared to 2010. Social media discussion about auto makers’ green marketing initiatives has also been more positive this year with a 44 percent increase in positive discussion versus 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/green-auto3.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29868 alignnone" title="green-auto" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/green-auto3.png" alt="green-auto" width="352" height="589" /></a></p>
<p>“Our research identifies how effective auto manufacturers are in raising awareness of their green products, initiatives, and innovations,” said Lois Miller, President, Nielsen Global Automotive. “We can then understand if they were able to change perceptions and consideration in a positive way among consumers.”</p>
<p>“We are thrilled that Nielsen Automotive has again chosen the Los Angeles Auto Show to host its increasingly important Green Marketer of the Year Award,” said Brendan Flynn, Director of Communications for the Los Angeles Auto Show. “Nielsen’s award provides an accurate and important gauge for auto makers and makes a perfect addition to the green story at the LA Show.”</p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
To determine the finalists and winner, Nielsen leveraged three research studies to incorporate awareness levels and perceptions across media types. The studies included:</p>
<ul>
<li>A custom survey of nearly 7,000 consumers’ cross-media awareness and perceptions of environmental messages by automotive brand</li>
<li>Response data from 2.5 million viewers of national television advertising collected by Nielsen’s ad effectiveness measurements service, focusing on green automotive ads</li>
<li>Measuring social media “buzz” sentiment within green-related discussion threads</li>
</ul>
<p>Auto manufacturers that ran any national TV ads with “green” themes between October 2010 and September 2011 were eligible for consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-announces-finalists-for-automotive-green-marketer-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Online Advertising, Big Impression Counts Don&#8217;t Mean High Audience Reach</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-online-advertising-big-impression-counts-dont-mean-high-audience-reach/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-online-advertising-big-impression-counts-dont-mean-high-audience-reach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Campaign Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research from Nielsen suggests that, while some individual websites perform very well at reaching an ad campaign’s intended audience, nearly all campaigns are delivered to consumers who are not valued by the brand advertiser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New research from Nielsen suggests that, while some individual websites perform very well at reaching an ad campaign’s intended audience, nearly all campaigns are delivered to consumers who are not valued by the brand advertiser. In a <a href="http://nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/reaching-the-right-audiences-online-campaign-ratings.html" target="_blank">recent study</a>, Nielsen measured a campaign for a beauty care brand that was hoping to improve its image among younger women. The advertiser designed a campaign focused on women 18-34 and ran 213 million impressions across 14 websites and ad networks for a six week period. Nielsen analysis showed that 33 percent of the impressions reached the desired audience (W 18-34), while 40 percent of the impressions were served to men.</p>
<p>Looking across dozens of campaigns spanning hundreds of websites, the results were the same, showing that the web consistently delivers millions of impressions – if not tens of millions – to the wrong people.</p>
<p>In the same beauty care product campaign, the 213 million impressions tracked-to-date seems to be at a level that could generate significant reach. In reality, the campaign overall hit slightly more than 40 million people across all demographic segments —a 13.6 percent reach. After focusing in on women 18-34, the campaign reached only 10.5 million women.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ocr-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29358" title="ocr-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ocr-1.png" alt="ocr-1" width="575" height="417" /></a></p>
<p>Despite these numbers, Nielsen research shows that the web does in fact deliver audiences more efficiently than some popular TV programs with very broad audiences.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/audience-reach.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29359" title="audience-reach" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/audience-reach.png" alt="audience-reach" width="565" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>For more on these findings, download the paper: <a href="http://nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/reaching-the-right-audiences-online-campaign-ratings.html">Reaching the Right Audiences Online: Early Findings from Nielsen Online Campaign Ratings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-online-advertising-big-impression-counts-dont-mean-high-audience-reach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research Shows Link Between Online Brand Metrics and Offline Sales</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that advertisers looking to build their brands online will need to look beyond traditional web metrics to determine if their investments are paying off. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers looking to build their brands online will need to look beyond traditional web metrics to determine if their investments are paying off, according to a recent study by Nielsen. In a new report, <a href="http://nielsen.com//content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/online-advertising-brand-building.html" target="_blank">Beyond Clicks and Impressions: Examining the Relationship Between Online Advertising and Brand Building</a>, there is emerging evidence that brand metrics – which show attitudinal response to online campaigns – can predict offline sales. The research further shows that there’s virtually no relationship between click-through rates and brand opinion or offline sales.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29331" title="brand-effect-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-1.png" alt="brand-effect-1" width="575" height="397" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29334" title="brand-effect-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-2.png" alt="brand-effect-2" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>In the study, Nielsen examined how exposure to Internet ad campaigns influenced brand measures such as ad recall and likeability, and whether the consumer said they were more likely to purchase the product after viewing the ad. The analysis showed that online ads do, on average, succeed in influencing brand engagement and opinion, particularly for ad recall and message association. However, the degree of positive brand impact largely depends on the strength of the ad itself.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29335" title="brand-effect-3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-3.png" alt="brand-effect-3" width="575" height="348" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29337" title="brand-effect-4" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/brand-effect-4.png" alt="brand-effect-4" width="575" height="395" /></a></p>
<p>The study then connected brand engagement results with actual offline sales measured by Nielsen. While based on a small number of cases to-date, the research showed that campaigns in which consumers reported an increase in purchase intent after viewing an online ad also showed a boost in offline product sales. Cases with flat purchase intent showed no significant change in sales.</p>
<p>Additionally, the research showed that the click-through rate for a given ad campaign showed no connection to sales lift and no measure of whether the message resonated with consumers.</p>
<ul>
<li>For more on these findings, download <a href="http://nielsen.com//content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/online-advertising-brand-building.html">Beyond Clicks and Impressions: Examining the Relationship Between Online Advertising and Brand Building</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/research-shows-link-between-online-brand-metrics-and-offline-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly 75% of Consumers Remember an Ad When Viewed Across Media Platforms</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross platform audience behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research from Nielsen, commissioned by Google, shows that advertising on multiple platforms substantially increases consumers’ ability to remember an ad campaign compared to when the ad is viewed on TV alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New research from Nielsen, commissioned by Google, shows that advertising on multiple platforms substantially increases consumers’ ability to remember an ad campaign compared to when the ad is viewed on TV alone.</p>
<p>In a media lab study conducted by Nielsen, participants viewed related content across a TV, computer, smartphone and tablet. A 15-second video ad promoting a premium sports sedan was shown to different groups with some people seeing no ads, and others seeing the ad on different combinations of screens.</p>
<p>In the group that was exposed to TV ads alone, 50 percent of people correctly attributed the ad to the correct auto brand. For groups that saw the ad across all screens – TV, computer, smartphone and tablet – the ability to remember the brand jumped dramatically to nearly three-in-four (74%).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_awareness_Ad.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29254" title="google ad awareness" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_awareness_Ad.gif" alt="google ad awareness" width="394" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>Similarly, only 22 percent of the group exposed to just the TV ad was able to correctly remember that the ad was for a 4-door sedan versus 39 percent of the group that saw the ad across all screens.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_engagement_Ad.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29255" title="Google_engagement_Ad" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google_engagement_Ad.gif" alt="Google_engagement_Ad" width="394" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>While research shows that TV remains the strongest driver of awareness, the study demonstrates that the addition of online and mobile campaigns returns the highest overall brand impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nearly-75-of-consumers-remember-an-ad-when-viewed-across-media-platforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southeast Asians &#8220;Like&#8221; Ads on Social Media Sites</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/southeast-asians-like-ads-on-social-media-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/southeast-asians-like-ads-on-social-media-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Southeast Asia, recent Nielsen research indicates that consumers are highly influenced by online advertising, much higher than the global average.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>David Webb, APMEA Region Managing Director of Advertising Solutions, Nielsen</strong></em></p>
<p>Social media sites are some of the most heavily visited and used sites on the Internet. Users of social media are among the most coveted for advertisers,  yet online ads are still largely under-represented in terms of their percentage of total ad spend.  As more and more proof of the effectiveness of online advertising comes to light, however, advertisers are beginning to take note. In Southeast Asia for example, recent Nielsen research indicates that consumers are highly influenced by online advertising &#8212; much higher than the global average. Nearly three-quarters (73%) of SE Asian consumers said they were “highly” or “somewhat” influenced by web site advertisements on social media (compared to 60% globally). That number rises to 80 percent when ads have a social context, such as indicating which of a consumer’s friends have liked or followed the advertised brand.</p>
<p>Online ads that are delivered to consumers based on previous purchases or other web sites visited also resonated with SE Asian consumers, with 74 percent saying they found this technique “made their lives easier”, compared to just 58 percent globally. Consumers in Philippines and Vietnam were most receptive to such ads (83% and 82%, respectively).</p>
<p>Nearly seven of 10 (69%) SE Asian consumers have “liked” or followed a brand or company on social media, significantly higher than the global average of 52 percent and higher again in countries such as Vietnam (79%) and Philippines (75%). Perhaps most importantly, consumer generated media (consumer opinions posted online) is now one of the most trusted forms of media among SE Asian digital consumers. More than half (54%) completely or somewhat trust consumer opinions posted online.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/southeast-asia-web-ad-influence.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28812" title="southeast-asia-web-ad-influence" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/southeast-asia-web-ad-influence.png" alt="southeast-asia-web-ad-influence" width="575" height="390" /></a></p>
<p>As consumers in the region become more familiar with social networking platforms, their levels of confidence and sophistication in using social media increase.  They tend to value and trust online content as a source of information. Online advertising can offer a high return on investment in this region, provided companies know precisely how to reach consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/southeast-asians-like-ads-on-social-media-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Ad Spend Up 8.8% in Q1 2011 as Advertisers Increase TV Spend</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spend-up-q1-2011-as-advertisers-increase-tv-spend/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spend-up-q1-2011-as-advertisers-increase-tv-spend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global advertising rose 8.8 percent year-on-year in Q1 to total USD 118 billion based on published rate cards, as advertisers spent more on television and continued  to invest in booming consumer Asian and Latin American markets. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global advertising rose 8.8 percent year-on-year in Q1 to total USD 118 billion based on published rate cards, as advertisers spent more on television and continued  to invest in booming consumer Asian and Latin American markets. According to the new <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/nielsen-global-adview-pulse-lite-q1-2011.html" target="_blank">Nielsen Global AdView Pulse report</a>, television advertising rose 11.9 percent year-on-year and increased its share among other traditional media (radio, magazines, and newspapers) from 63.5 percent to 65.3 percent in both developed and many emerging economies.</p>
<p>“With USD 6.50 of every ten dollars being spent on television, it’s clear that TV remains the most important and cost effective advertising medium for companies looking to reach new consumers, especially in booming emerging markets,” said Randall Beard, Global Head of Advertiser Solutions for Nielsen. “In fact, according to two Nielsen reports released last month, women globally said they preferred to find out information on new products and services via television more than any other medium, and the Q1 Nielsen Cross-Platform Report showed that Americans are watching more TV than ever before.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/media-change-advertising.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28312" title="media-change-advertising" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/media-change-advertising.png" alt="media-change-advertising" width="575" height="403" /></a></p>
<p>Advertising in the world’s largest market, USA, rose 5.9 percent to reach nearly USD 27 billion in Q1 with stable increases for TV, radio and magazines; however, newspaper advertising dropped by more than 10 percent in another blow to the domestic newsprint industry. Newspaper advertising also declined -1.6 percent in Western Europe in Q1.</p>
<p>Emerging regions of Asia-Pacific (+12.4%) and Latin America (+11%) drove global ad growth in Q1, followed by Middle East/Africa which still increased 10.4 percent despite a 51.3 percent decline in Egypt’s ad revenue as most companies temporarily halted advertising during the country’s social and political upheaval. Western Europe posted the lowest growth rate of all global regions in Q1 of 2.9 percent as the region’s divergent economic performance sent ad spend in  Greece, Ireland, Italy and Spain into negative territory – in contrast to double-digit growth in Europe’s more robust markets of  Turkey (+12.9%), France (11.6%), and Norway (+10.2%).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/regions-change-advertising.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28311" title="regions-change-advertising" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/regions-change-advertising.png" alt="regions-change-advertising" width="560" height="369" /></a></p>
<p>Argentina (+37%) and South Africa (+34.8%) posted the highest year-on-year gains, while other emerging markets of China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Saudi Arabia had double-digit gains in Q1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-ad-spend-up-q1-2011-as-advertisers-increase-tv-spend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact Sheet: U.S. Advertising Spend and Effectiveness</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Nielsen advertising fact sheet details ad spend and effectiveness trends, as well as the latest insights on branded entertainment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the ever-changing media landscape, consumers&#8217; growing choice of platforms and media content makes it harder for advertisers to reach their desired audience. With an array of options relative investing marketing dollars, advertisers are looking to better understand and accurately measure the impact of their advertising on brand and sales goals. A new Nielsen <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/advertising-spend-effectiveness-q1-2011.html">advertising fact sheet</a><strong> </strong>details ad spend and effectiveness trends, as well as the latest insights on branded entertainment.</p>
<p><strong>Key Takeaways:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Television advertising surpassed $18 billion in the first quarter of 2011, growing almost nine percent versus the same period in 2010.</li>
<li>On average, ads that aired during the Super Bowl were 58 percent more memorable than all commercials that aired during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.</li>
<li>Recommendations from personal acquaintances was cited as the most trusted form of advertisement by U.S. Internet consumers (76%). Forty-nine percent said they trusted consumer opinions posted online.</li>
<li>Mobile advertising is increasingly finding its way into mobile apps, with teenagers being much more receptive than their elders. 58 percent of teens say they “always” or “sometimes” look at mobile ads.</li>
<li>Across 12 broadcast and major cable networks in primetime, there were 5,381 major product placements in 2010, up 22 percent since 2006.</li>
<li>Reality shows dominated broadcast and cable with the most placement occurrences in the first quarter of 2011, accounting for over half of all placements. While consumers can better remember the brands of placements during Sitcoms, placements in Reality programs are the most effective at positively impacting viewer opinion of the integrated brand.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ad-spend-q111.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27900" title="advertising spend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ad-spend-q111.png" alt="advertising spend" width="551" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>For more charts and trends, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/advertising-spend-effectiveness-q1-2011.html">Trends in Advertising Spend and Effectiveness</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fact-sheet-u-s-advertising-spend-and-effectiveness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Ads Score Big in List of Most-Liked Ads of Q1 2011</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=27517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Volkswagen’s Little Darth Vader ad, where a small boy is stunned by his powers, was not only a standout commercial in this year’s Super Bowl, but it also took the top spot among Most Liked new ads of the entire first quarter 2011. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volkswagen’s Little Darth Vader ad, where a small boy is stunned by his powers, was not only a standout commercial in this year’s Super Bowl, but it also took the top spot among Most Liked new ads of the entire first quarter 2011.</p>
<p>A Nielsen analysis of the top ads debuting in Q1 of this year revealed that, while Super Bowl ads were among some of the best liked commercials (four of the top five Most Liked ads appeared in the big game), several other creatives managed to break through the clutter as well.</p>
<p>In fact, overall, six out of 10 Most-Liked ads were not shown in the Super Bowl, including a 30-second spot from M&amp;M, which ranked third on the list.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Nielsen Top 10 Most Liked Ads: Q1 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description / Duration</th>
<th> Likeability Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Passat &#8212; Little Darth Vader starts car (:30)</td>
<td>232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Man licks cheese crumbs off of coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>227</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>M&amp;M</td>
<td>Convenience store robber threatens to eat M&amp;M hostage if demands are not met (:30)</td>
<td>225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Housesitter brings grandpa back to life (:30)</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Montage of people watching football on well-known classic TV shows  (:60)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Snickers</td>
<td>Peanut Butter Squared &#8212; Woman asks sharks which human tasted better (:30)</td>
<td>211</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Dove</td>
<td>Woman leaves chocolate gifts for Valentine&#8217;s Day, including one for herself. (:15)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Canada Dry</td>
<td>People pull roots, cans of soda, and a soda machine out of the ground (:30)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>General Electric</td>
<td>Ecomagination &#8212; Animated elephant dances in jungle (:30)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>M&amp;M</td>
<td>Pretzel &#8212; Patrick Warburton turns into a pretzel M&amp;M after eating them (:15)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company: Only new ad executions considered, airing from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those who remembered the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.  For example, with a recall index of 232 the top ranked Volkswagen ad has proven to be 2.31 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past quarter.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>For the most memorable ads, the high profile platform provided by the Super Bowl seemed to have more of an impact. Seven of the top 10 ads with the strongest Brand Recall score came from the game. The top commercial featured a Western backdrop, where a cowboy demands Budweiser when he enters a saloon. Overall, the ads with the highest Brand Recall significantly outperformed the average commercial in the first quarter of 2011 – they were more than twice as memorable as other new creatives.</p>
<p>Two Super Bowl ads scored on both Brand Recall and Likeability: a Doritos ad where a man licks crumbs off his co-worker’s fingers (#2 Most-Liked, #3 Most-Recalled), and an NFL montage (#5 Most-Liked, #7 Most-Recalled) ranked in the top 10 on both lists.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Nielsen Top 10 Most Recalled Ads: Q1 2011</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Brand</th>
<th> Ad Description / Duration</th>
<th> Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Cowboy in Western saloon sings (:60)</td>
<td>232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Pug knocks down door after boyfriend taunts with chips (:30)</td>
<td>227</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Man licks cheese crumbs off of coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Yoplait</td>
<td>Light &#8212; Woman talks on phone about her diet; husband searches for treats (:15)</td>
<td>217</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cheez-It</td>
<td>Wheel of cheese tells immature jokes and is deemed unready to be eaten (:30)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Pepsi Max</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Pepsi Max &#8212; Soda cans shoot out of cooler and hit bullies (:30)</td>
<td>211</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>NFL</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Montage of people watching football on classic TV shows  (:60)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>GoDaddy.co &#8212; New spokesperson Joan Rivers is revealed (:30)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Head &amp; Shoulders</td>
<td>Itchy Scalp Care &#8212; Woman scratches her scalp on a date and messes up her hairstyle (:30)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Super Bowl &#8212; Bud Light &#8212; Dogs work at party (:30)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company: Only new ad executions considered, airing from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can remember within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Recall Index). 100 equals average.  For example, with a recall index of 232 the top ranked Budweiser ad has proven to be 2.32 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past quarter.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowl-ads-score-big-in-list-of-most-liked-ads-of-q1-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

