<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; ad effectiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/tag/ad-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nielsen&#8217;s Tops of 2011: Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen looks at the most effective TV advertisements of 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Volkswagen’s adorable Darth Vader-inspired Super Bowl spot to Purell’s memorable placement on The Big Bang Theory, Nielsen names the top advertisements and integrations of the year. The lists demonstrate that reality and scripted shows continued to find innovative ways to integrate brands into their broadcast primetime programming. The best liked ads reflect the enduring value of traditional ad elements that have withstood the test of time &#8211; strong creative, simple and engaging messaging, and a solid emotional connection.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for Nielsen’s top 10s in TV, digital and entertainment.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Most-Liked New Ads</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Title</th>
<th> Ad Description (Seconds)</th>
<th> Likability Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Volkswagen</td>
<td>Super Bowl: Passat &#8212; A little boy dressed as Darth Vader believes he used &#8220;the force&#8221; to turn on a car (:30)</td>
<td>231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Oreo</td>
<td>Boy wakes up father at midnight for a Father&#8217;s Day treat (:15)</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>St. Jude&#8217;s</td>
<td>Shaun White sits with kids, who wear wigs matching his hairstyle (:30)</td>
<td>191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Hallmark</td>
<td>Recordable Storybook &#8212; Deployed soldier shares holidays with family when he flips through recorded storybook (:30)</td>
<td>190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Real California Milk</td>
<td>Cow tells mom to change her &#8220;mom jeans&#8221; and show off her &#8220;bundt cake&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>189</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Super Bowl: A man licks snack crumbs off his coworker&#8217;s fingers (:30)</td>
<td>188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Target</td>
<td>Boy in gecko costume uses sticky gecko hands to take all of the candy when trick-or-treating (:15)</td>
<td>187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>M&amp;M&#8217;s</td>
<td>Pretzel &#8212; Candy and pretzel combo prefer to be eaten by attractive woman than man they call &#8220;Hungry Eyes&#8221; (:30)</td>
<td>186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Marie Callender&#8217;s &amp; Reddi-Wip</td>
<td>Boy is happy to sit at the adult table but returns to eat with the kids when they are served pie and whipped cream. (:30)</td>
<td>185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Pepsi</td>
<td>Pop stars like Michael Jackson, Ray Charles, Britney Spears, Kanye West, and Mariah Carey perform and drink soda. (:30)</td>
<td>184</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Data from January 1, 2011 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Broadcast Prime. Only new ad executions considered. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.</p>
<p>Read as: With a Likeability Index of 231 the top ranked Volkswagen ad has proven to be 131 percent better-liked than the average new commercial during the measured period.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Most Remembered Branded Integrations &#8211; Dramas/Sitcoms</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Branded Integration Description</th>
<th>Program (Network/Air Date)</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Purell</td>
<td>Sheldon uses hand sanitizer after he puts a live snake in a desk drawer.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Oct 27)</td>
<td>271</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Red Bull</td>
<td>Tessa describes the official drink of suburbia; people drink it repeatedly.</td>
<td>Suburgatory (ABC, Sep 28)</td>
<td>214</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Milton Bradley</td>
<td>Twister &#8212; Amy suggests that the group play the travel version of a game.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Nov 17)</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Ferrari</td>
<td>Beckett drives a car after Castle explains that it is a high performance vehicle.</td>
<td>Castle (ABC, Feb 7)</td>
<td>207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Subway</td>
<td>Big Mike says that his kidnapping hasn&#8217;t been that bad because his kidnappers brought sandwiches.</td>
<td>Chuck (NBC, Mar 21)</td>
<td>206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Wizards of the Coast Games</td>
<td>Dungeons &amp; Dragons &#8212; Wolowitz comments on the way that Sheldon plays a board game.</td>
<td>The Big Bang Theory (CBS, Oct 6)</td>
<td>205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Rolex</td>
<td>Laura comments on the price of a watch she purchased before she realizes it may have been stolen.</td>
<td>Pan Am (ABC, Oct 30)</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Snapple</td>
<td>Waldon drinks a beverage while talking to Alan about his breakup.</td>
<td>Two and a Half Men (CBS, Oct 17)</td>
<td>203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Hasbro</td>
<td>Scrabble &#8212; Dick tells Susan that he&#8217;d rather play Scrabble than talk to her.</td>
<td>Desperate Housewives (ABC, Jan 16)</td>
<td>200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Hasbro</td>
<td>Monopoly &#8212; Penny wants to play a board game after getting home from a trip with Tom.</td>
<td>Desperate Housewives (ABC, Oct 2)</td>
<td>199</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Data from January 1, 2011 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Broadcast Prime. The Recall Score is the percentage of television viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand/product of a branded integration they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing Dramas/Sitcoms. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all integrations occurring in this genre during the time period (Recall Index). 100 equals average.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5">Note: For this analysis, branded integrations were only considered if the occurrence had visual elements (i.e., was &#8220;seen&#8221; on-screen) or both visual and auditory elements (i.e., was both &#8220;seen&#8221; and &#8220;mentioned&#8221;). Only first-run episodes were considered. Both planned and incidental exposures were included.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Primetime Programs with Product Placement Activity</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Rank</th>
<th> Program</th>
<th> Network</th>
<th> Total Number of Occurrences</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>American Idol</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>577</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>The Biggest Loser</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>533</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>The Celebrity Apprentice</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>391</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Dancing with the Stars</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>The X Factor</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>312</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Extreme Makeover: Home Edition</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>America&#8217;s Got Talent</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Friday Night Lights</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</td>
<td>CW</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>The Amazing Race: Unfinished Business</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>161</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Data from January 1 &#8211; November 30, 2011. Primetime entertainment programming on five Broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, CW, FOX, and NBC).  First-run episodes only.  As a result of coding enhancements implemented in 2009, occurrence counts now reflect the total number of show segments in which a brand/product appears or is mentioned.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsens-tops-of-2011-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Study: How Online Ad Campaign Success Varies by Site Type</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Campaign Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen recently analyzed an online CPG campaign geared towards women 25-54 that ran across three ad networks and a women’s interest site. The study showed the campaign successfully reached its intended audience only 27 percent of the time and instead was most often viewed by older demographics outside of the desired group.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen recently analyzed an online CPG campaign geared towards women 25-54 that ran across three ad networks and a women’s interest site. The study showed the campaign successfully reached its intended audience only 27 percent of the time and instead was most often viewed by older demographics outside of the desired group.</p>
<p>Even more surprising was the degree of variability between the different media sellers. Nielsen found that while the three ad networks reached the campaign’s intended audience 20-30 percent of the time, the women’s interest site, due to its audience composition, was most successful at delivering the intended audience.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ocr-wire-effectiveness.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29857" title="ocr-wire-effectiveness" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ocr-wire-effectiveness.png" alt="ocr-wire-effectiveness" width="575" height="322" /></a></p>
<p>For more on this case study, download the report, <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2011/building-brands-in-a-cross-platform-world.html">Building Brands in a Cross-Platform World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/case-study-how-online-ad-campaign-success-varies-by-site-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Top 10s and Trends for 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=25534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company released a list of the most popular media and consumer spending trends in the U.S. for 2010, covering everything from the most popular television shows, to the most liked commercials, book sales, purchasing trends, top mobile apps and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen Company released a list of the most popular media and consumer spending trends in the U.S. for 2010, covering everything from the most popular television shows, to the most liked commercials, book sales, purchasing trends, top mobile apps and more.</p>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Nielsen-Top-10s-2010.pdf">Nielsen&#8217;s top 10s and trends in the U.S. for 2010</a>.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="100%">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Single Telecast</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Telecast</th>
<th>Originator</th>
<th>Date Aired</th>
<th>Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Super Bowl XLIV</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>36.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Super   Bowl XLIV Post Game</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>25.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Super   Bowl Kick-Off</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>FOX   NFC Championship</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/24/10</td>
<td>19.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>AFC   Championship on CBS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>1/24/10</td>
<td>16.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Academy Awards</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>3/7/10</td>
<td>14.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Undercover Boss</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>2/7/10</td>
<td>13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>FOX NFC Playoff-Sun</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/17/10</td>
<td>12.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>AFC Divisional Playoff-Sun</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>1/17/10</td>
<td>12.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>FOX NFC Wildcard Game</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>1/10/10</td>
<td>11.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
*Top Telecasts: Note: Data from January 1, 2010 – November 28, 2010. Persons 2+ Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Excludes telecasts under 5 minutes.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="chart" border="0" width="100%">
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="5">Top 10 TV Programs – Regularly Scheduled</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Originator</th>
<th>Total Persons Rating</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>American Idol -Tuesday</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>7.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>American Idol -Wednesday</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Dancing with the Stars</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>7.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>NBC Sunday Night Football</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>7.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Dancing w/Stars Results</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Sunday Night NFL Pre-Kick</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>5.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>NCIS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>NFL Regular Season L</td>
<td>ESPN</td>
<td>4.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Survivor: Heroes-Villains</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>NCIS: Los Angeles</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Two and a Half Men</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company.<br />
*Top Primetime programs: Note Data from January 1, 2010 – November 28, 2010, regularly scheduled programs. Persons 2+ Ratings include Live and Same Day timeshifted viewing. Excludes programs with less than 4 telecasts and programs under 5 minutes.</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/u-s-top-10s-and-trends-for-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen at Advertising Week: Fact Sheet and Video Presentations</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connected devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Online Campaign Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen Company provides a snapshot of ad spending in 2009 and the first half of 2010 along with videos of its key announcements and findings during the event.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">For Advertising Week, The Nielsen Company provided a snapshot of ad spending in the U.S., including a comparison of ad dollars in 2009 vs. the first half of 2010. While some sectors like Automotive and Auto Insurance are up in 2010, the majority of ad categories are down relative to the same time period in 2009.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/top-10-ad-categories.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-24260 aligncenter" title="top-10-ad-categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/top-10-ad-categories.png" alt="top-10-ad-categories" width="555" height="688" /></a></p>
<h3>Ad Spending Overview</h3>
<ul>
<li>$117B was spent on all U.S. advertising in 2009. 57% of all ad spending in 2009 went into Television, making it the largest medium for advertisers. Print media earned approximately 28% of ad dollars, while Internet earned 7% of all ad dollars.</li>
<li>The top spending product category for national TV was Automotive with $3.4B spent in 2009. The most significant growth by any one category among the top 20 was mobile phones, with national TV spend growing almost 200% to $587M in 2009.</li>
<li>Ad dollars spent in primetime in national television account for about 50% of total TV ad dollars.</li>
<li>The 30-second commercial remains the television advertising standard in primetime, accounting for 54% of all commercials (2009). However, the number of 30-second commercials has decreased 5% in primetime, while the number of 15-second commercials has increased 6%.</li>
<li>For more, including ad effectiveness data, download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Nielsen-Advertising-Fact-Sheet.pdf">Nielsen Advertising Fact Sheet</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Event Video</h3>
<p>On Monday, Steve Hasker, President of Media Services, The Nielsen Company, announced a <a href="http://http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsen-announces-major-step-forward-in-online-advertising-measurement/">&#8220;major step forward&#8221;</a> in online advertising measurement, Nielsen Online Campaign Ratings.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="416" height="337" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb13mDa-cREvNvz2vlbH6XFc=" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" height="337" src="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb13mDa-cREvNvz2vlbH6XFc="></embed></object></p>
<p>On Tuesday, Jonathan Carson, CEO of Nielsen&#8217;s Telecom practice, presented findings from Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-connected-devices-age-ipads-kindles-smartphones-and-the-connected-consumer/">Connected Devices Playbook</a>, which measures the impact of iPads, Kindles and various other net-ready devices.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="416" height="337" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb0-tAgpZr9HLUD7FJ5bsbpg=" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" height="337" src="http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFOfERJnh2JXb0-tAgpZr9HLUD7FJ5bsbpg="></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-at-advertising-week-fact-sheet-and-video-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official World Cup Sponsors Show Higher Effectiveness with TV Ads</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although neither the the USA or England teams remain contenders for the World Cup, TV advertisers in the U.S. and U.K. appear to have scored with viewers...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although neither the the USA or England teams remain contenders for the World Cup, TV advertisers in the U.S. and U.K. appear to have scored with viewers during the first half of the tournament, according to a Nielsen analysis of advertising effectiveness in the two countries.</p>
<p>In the U.S, Nielsen monitored national advertising during weekend ABC and ESPN matches, plus all Team USA matches from June 11-26, and found that official sponsors connected better with World Cup fans. Nielsen data showed that the five primary World Cup TV sponsors (Adidas, AT&amp;T, Budweiser, Hyundai and Sony) generated 55% higher Net Likeability on average compared to commercials from other, non-sponsor World Cup advertisers. The sponsors also generated 16% higher Brand Recall on average for their World Cup in-game/in-studio elements, such as the Hyundai “Halftime Report” and the Adidas &#8220;First Half Highlights,&#8221; versus their typical in-game sponsorship performance in other sporting events.</p>
<p>“Nielsen data clearly shows an advantage for U.S. sponsors who have had an expanded presence in the matches with in-game or in-studio elements,” said Alan Gould, CEO of Nielsen IAG, which measures TV advertising effectiveness and program engagement. “The presence of these elements, which are integrated seamlessly into programming, is likely bolstering the effectiveness of these brands&#8217; traditional TV commercials that air around the matches.”</p>
<p>In examining ad performance of new campaigns launched by World Cup sponsors and non-sponsors since the start of the tournament, Nielsen data also showed that ads from Budweiser, M&amp;M’s, Macy’s, Sony and Hyundai scored highest in Net Likeability, with the greatest percentage of World Cup TV viewers recalling the commercial, the advertised brand, and reporting to like the ad &#8220;a lot&#8221; or &#8220;somewhat.”</p>
<p>Even World Cup fans are not immune to the gender divide as Nielsen ad effectiveness data shows that some World Cup ads seemed to be more engaging to certain genders in the U.S. While ads for Nike and Hyundai generated the high Net Likeability for female World Cup TV viewers, ads from Adidas and Cisco were hits with male audiences.</p>
<p><strong>Both Sponsors and Non-sponsors Faring Well across the Pond<br />
</strong>The World Cup, which proved to be a big draw for U.K. viewers, also provided an advertiser-friendly environment for sponsors and non-sponsors alike in the U.K.  Nielsen IAG monitored advertising during World Cup programming on ITV1 in the U.K., including game, pre-game and post-game analysis from June 11-22, and found that, among new ad executions airing since the start of the tournament, ads for BT Telecommunications, Churchill Insurance, The Sun, Renault Automobiles and Carling all made the top 5 in Brand Recall. Among the top 5, only two – The Sun and Carling – are World Cup-themed.</p>
<p>A look at all World Cup-themed ads, including those that began airing during the run-up to the tournament, showed that England national team sponsor, Nationwide Building Society, topped the list in Brand Recall, followed by two ads from WeBuyAnyCar.com and the commercials from The Sun and Carling. The spot from Nationwide Building Society also ranked in the top 5 most liked ads, but it was a commercial for Magner’s Irish Cider that scored highest in Net Likeability, with a 22% higher than average number of viewers reporting that they recalled the ad, the advertised brand, and reporting to like the ad &#8220;a lot&#8221; or &#8220;somewhat.”</p>
<p>Official World Cup sponsor Visa, which decided to air World Cup TV ads outside the U.S. only, also saw a significant lift in Likeability within World Cup programming. Visa’s World Cup-themed credit card ad scored a 100% increase in Likeability when it aired during World Cup programming, versus airings for the same ad during non-sports programming. Nationwide Building Society received a nearly 80% lift in Brand Recall and a 95% increase in Likeability for its themed ad during World Cup programming versus when it aired in non-sports programming.</p>
<p>“While official sponsors are seeing their investments pay off as viewers are showing they’re receptive to the advertisements and that the messages are resonating well with the audience, there are clearly also significant opportunities for other advertisers to capitalize on the engaging environment that a major event such as the World Cup provides,” said Gould.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/official-world-cup-sponsors-show-higher-effectiveness-with-tv-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Most Liked and Most Recalled Ads: May 10-June 6</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=22558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ad from Target that tied into the finale of LOST and a summer-themed Walmart ad were the most liked and most recalled ads of the most recent period tracked by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ad from Target that tied into the finale of LOST and a summer-themed Walmart ad were the most liked and most recalled ads of the most recent period tracked by Nielsen.</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Top Ten Most Liked New Ads, May 10, 2010 to June 6, 2010							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	RANK	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Description	</th>
<th>	Likeability Index	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Black smoke emerges from jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; First Alert smoke detector	</td>
<td>	209	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Aflac	</td>
<td>	Animated kids play roughly with toys; if you get hurt, you get paid cash fast; Toy Story 3 	</td>
<td>	151	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	McDonald&#8217;s	</td>
<td>	Shrek Forever After Glasses&#8211;Donkey tells Shrek that outside forces are making him crazy 	</td>
<td>	148	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Ford	</td>
<td>	Fiesta&#8211;People with arrows highlight gas mileage; 40 more movies, concerts, ballgames	</td>
<td>	139	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Walmart	</td>
<td>	Mom let me show you the coolest rollback in the store; what&#8217;s better than a dessert on rollback?	</td>
<td>	134	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Johnsonville Sausage	</td>
<td>	Man wrestles with children at summer barbecue, then runs to grill and eats sausage 	</td>
<td>	124	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	Chevrolet	</td>
<td>	Everyone deserves a car they can count on; images of cars in testing; Red X engineers obsessed with quality 	</td>
<td>	122	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Visa	</td>
<td>	Debit&#8211;Characters from Toy Story see Buzz in shopping basket and try to save him from getting bought	</td>
<td>	121	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Hebrew National	</td>
<td>	Hot dogs made with 100% kosher beef; woman dressed as royalty renames them &#8220;Queen Elizabeefs&#8221;	</td>
<td>	120	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	Cadillac	</td>
<td>	CTS V&#8211;World&#8217;s fastest production sedan; 0-60 in 3.9 secs; car accelerates on street at night	</td>
<td>	114	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company<br />	<br />
		Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of May 10 to June 6, 2010. The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Likeability index of 209 the top-ranked Target ad has proven to be 109% better-liked than the average new commercial during the past four-week period.  	</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart -->	</p>
<p><!-- start chart --><br />
<table class="chart">
<tr>
<th colspan="4">	Top Ten Most Recalled New Ads, May 10, 2010 to June 6, 2010							</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>	RANK	</th>
<th>	Brand	</th>
<th>	Description	</th>
<th>	Likeability Index	</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	1	</td>
<td>	Walmart	</td>
<td>	Watch Mr. Rollback drop the price of your summer cookout; Heinz ketchup, Sara Lee hot dog buns	</td>
<td>	241	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	2	</td>
<td>	Pantene 	</td>
<td>	Stacy London announces the first reality hair star winner during &#8220;live&#8221; commercial 	</td>
<td>	224	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	3	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Wild boar runs through jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; Kraft Original Barbecue Sauce	</td>
<td>	210	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	4	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Black smoke emerges from jungle; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme; First Alert smoke detector	</td>
<td>	209	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	5	</td>
<td>	Target	</td>
<td>	Man types numbers into computer; execute button doesn&#8217;t work; &#8220;Lost&#8221; theme	</td>
<td>	207	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	6	</td>
<td>	Subway	</td>
<td>	Man eating a burger falls through hammock; try a Fresh Fit meal 	</td>
<td>	200	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	7	</td>
<td>	Verizon	</td>
<td>	Droid&#8211;Smart phone can see through walls, locate restaurants and shops though viewfinder	</td>
<td>	193	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	8	</td>
<td>	Domino&#8217;s	</td>
<td>	Workers try to get Bill Johnson to try their pizza; 2 medium, 2 topping pizzas for $5.99 each	</td>
<td>	187	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	9	</td>
<td>	Victoria&#8217;s Secret	</td>
<td>	Biofit 7-Way&#8211;One bra that you can wear seven ways; different strap arrangements shown	</td>
<td>	186	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">	10	</td>
<td>	AT&#038;T	</td>
<td>	Huge sheets of orange cloth cover buildings and landmarks across the country	</td>
<td>	182	</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">	Source: The Nielsen Company<br />	<br />
		Only new ad executions considered, airing weeks of May 10 to June 6, 2010. The Recall Score is the percentage of TV viewers who can recall within 24 hours the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV. These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a recall index of 241 the top ranked Walmart ad has proven to be over 2.4 times as memorable as the average new commercial during the past four-week period. 							</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>	<!-- end chart -->	</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/top-10-most-liked-and-most-recalled-ads-may-10-june-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen/Facebook Report: The Value of Social Media Ad Impressions</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsenfacebook-ad-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsenfacebook-ad-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrandLift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gibs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With data from more than 125 Facebook advertising campaigns from 70 brands, Nielsen and Facebook release their findings that hold important implications for brand advertisers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Jon Gibs, Vice President, Media Analytics, The Nielsen Company<br />
Sean Bruich, Measurement Research, Facebook, Inc.</strong></em></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve heard from countless brand marketers about the need for guidance when it comes to measuring the value of social media  advertising. It&#8217;s why we&#8217;ve made a major investment towards helping advertisers  understand how to achieve their brand goals in a social context. Our joint report: <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/events-webinars/2010/understanding-the-value-of-a-social-media-impression.html" target="_blank">Advertising Effectiveness: Understanding the Value of a Social Media Impression</a> provides early insights from <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nielsen-in-a-relationship-with-facebook/">Nielsen&#8217;s BrandLift</a> product which analyzed survey data from more than 800,000 Facebook users in response to more than 125 Facebook ad campaigns from 70 brand advertisers.</p>
<p>While the medium of social media advertising is still a wild frontier for some,  the BrandLift framework solves a number of advertiser concerns by providing quantifiable data that can be mapped to trusted advertising effectiveness benchmarks already in place: Ad Recall, Brand Awareness, and  Purchase Intent.</p>
<p><strong>Suggesting You &#8220;Become A Fan&#8221; Of Social Engagement</strong><a href="../consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/"><br />
Study  after study</a> has shown that consumers trust their friends and peers  more than anyone else when it comes to making a purchase decision. It’s critical that we understand advertising not just in terms of &#8220;paid&#8221; media, but also in terms of how &#8220;earned&#8221; media (advertising that is passed along or shared among to friends and beyond) and social advocacy  contribute to campaigns. To that end, we took a closer look at 14 Facebook ad campaigns that incorporated the &#8220;Become A Fan&#8221; engagement unit and sliced the effectiveness results three different ways, by each of the types of ads available on Facebook: 1) Lift from a standard “Homepage Ad”; 2) Lift from an ad that featured social context or “Homepage ads with Social Context”; and 3) Lift from “Organic Ads,” newsfeed stories that are sent to friends of users who engage with advertising on a brand.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/social-ads.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21405" title="social-ads" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/social-ads.png" alt="social-ads" width="575" height="312" /></a></p>
<p>For those Homepage ads at the top of the marketing funnel, awareness increased on average by 4% between exposed and control audiences. Purchase intent also increased on average by 2% following ad exposure on Facebook.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ads-vs-control.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21450" title="ads-vs-control" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ads-vs-control.png" alt="ads-vs-control" width="530" height="330" /></a></p>
<p>Comparing the responses of those users who had seen ads with social context against users who saw ads with no social context from the same campaign, we saw a measurable lift in lift.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ads-w-advocacy.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21449" title="ads-w-advocacy" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ads-w-advocacy.png" alt="ads-w-advocacy" width="570" height="350" /></a></p>
<p>While exposure to the homepage ad itself increased ad recall, those users exposed to both the “paid ad” and the organic impression remembered the ad at three times the rate of those just exposed to the paid homepage ad. We saw a similar effect for the other two metrics evaluated. Homepage ads increased awareness of the product or brand by 4% on average, but exposure to both homepage ads and organic ads increased awareness by a delta of 13% versus the control group. Exposure to organic impressions also impacted purchase intent as well, increasing the impact of the ad from 2% to 8%.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ad-vs-organic.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21452" title="ad-vs-organic" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ad-vs-organic.png" alt="ad-vs-organic" width="573" height="360" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>For more on earned media, social advertising and the methodology behind  the study, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/events-webinars/2010/understanding-the-value-of-a-social-media-impression.html" target="_blank">Advertising Effectiveness: Understanding the Value of a Social Media  Impression</a>.</p>
<p>We invite you to ask questions, leave comments below. We&#8217;re love to hear your thoughts.<strong><br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nielsenfacebook-ad-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking at Lift: Inside Online Video Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/looking-at-lift-inside-online-video-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/looking-at-lift-inside-online-video-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether watching a short clip on YouTube or an entire TV program, almost three-quarters (72%) of Internet users view videos online -- amounting to 144 million people. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With most U.S. homes connected to broadband, the viewing of online video has never been easier.  Whether watching a short clip on YouTube or an entire TV program, almost three-quarters (72%) of Internet users view videos online &#8212; amounting to 144 million people.  To marketers, this presents a huge &#8211; and largely untapped &#8211; audience to reach.  And while online advertising fell overall in 2009, ad spend on online videos grew 41%.</p>
<p>In a recent presentation at the Advertising Research Foundation’s annual <a href="http://www.thearf.org/assets/rethink-10?fbid=0BuFOTpmyAT" target="_blank">RE: Think</a> conference, Dave Kaplan, Senior Vice President, Product Leadership at Nielsen IAG, and Beth Uyenco, Director of Global Research at Microsoft, discussed the ins and outs of online advertising and how to effectively reach video viewers.  Evaluating 238 brands encompassing 412 products in 951 ad executions in streaming full-episode TV programs, Nielsen IAG used the key brand impact metrics of ad recall, brand recall, message recall and likeability to determine the effectiveness of ads.  More than 14,000 surveys were conducted.</p>
<p>The patterns they uncovered were consistent:  video ads run during online full-episode TV programs yield <em>deeper</em> brand impact than corresponding on-air TV ads, with the difference most pronounced among younger viewers age 13-34.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/online-ad-v-tv.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21466" title="online-ad-v-tv" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/online-ad-v-tv.png" alt="online-ad-v-tv" width="462" height="350" /></a></p>
<p>What accounts for this variation in impact between online video and traditional TV? Data shows that web video viewers are more engaged and attentive to the programs they are watching, which is likely a function of the viewing environment and the oft-required active mouse-clicking to initiate nd continue content. Online video is also still a relative novelty compared to traditional forms of media.  Further, and most significantly, reduced ad clutter and the inability to easily skip ads are considerable recall-enhancing factors.</p>
<p>While creating a unique ad specifically for use in online video may be desirable, advertisers might want to consider that TV ads repurposed for online full episodes actually generated the top results. It may be that the TV executions possess higher production values, or that online full episode viewers still prefer the absorptive and passive nature of traditional-style TV spots.</p>
<p>“Advertisers might be able to save money by utilizing those ads already in the hopper. Even when controlling for exposure, we see that repurposed TV spots resonate quite well in the streaming full-episode environment,” said Kaplan.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> In-Stream Ad Performance by Creative Type</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Creative Type</th>
<th> General Recall</th>
<th> Brand Linkage</th>
<th> Message Linkage</th>
<th> Likeability Linkage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Repurposed TV Ads</td>
<td>66%</td>
<td>76%</td>
<td>80%</td>
<td>55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Web Original Video Ads</td>
<td>58%</td>
<td>72%</td>
<td>72%</td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Flash Animation/Interactive</td>
<td>47%</td>
<td>78%</td>
<td>68%</td>
<td>46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>But the results of the study don’t point toward an “either or” approach to advertising dollar allocation, especially given that audience reach and CPMs can vary greatly between linear TV and online streaming TV.  Instead, the data suggests the benefits of utilizing both platforms in tandem to achieve advertising objectives.</p>
<p>“It appears that leveraging the large reach of TV in combination with  the standalone impact and amplifying effect of online video makes for a  successful marketing strategy,” said Kaplan.</p>
<p>Specifically, online video ads help to reinforce and strengthen the  impact of a traditional TV campaign. Including online video advertising  in the media mix and synchronizing with TV greatly improves all key  brand metrics, especially message recall.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/message-recall.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21469" title="message-recall" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/message-recall.png" alt="message-recall" width="462" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/looking-at-lift-inside-online-video-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Recalled Drug Commercials Are not the Biggest Spenders</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending the most doesn’t necessarily equate to efficiency in viewer recollection. Nielsen IAG found that the top four most memorable Pharma TV commercials in 2009 did not spend the most on their respective campaigns. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although spending for pharmaceutical drug advertising on TV is not at the level it used to be, the investment by marketers in this space remained stable with a 0.6% increase in 2009 expenditures on national TV compared to 2008, according to The Nielsen Company.  With six of the top 10 brands spending more than $100M on national broadcast, cable, and syndicated TV ads, the cholesterol reducing drug Lipitor had the largest expenditure in 2009.  Erectile dysfunction drug Cialis by maker Eli Lilly was the second-highest spender followed by Abilify, an add-on treatment for depression from Bristol-Meyers Squibb.  Despite the recession, the top 10 prescription brand spenders invested $1.1 billion on national TV commercials, compared to $1.0 billion in 2008.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">TOP 10 RX BRANDS &#8212; TV EXPENDITURE 2009</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Lipitor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Abilify</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Cymbalta</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Plavix</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Symbicort</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Lyrica</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Advair</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Viagra</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Crestor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Spending the most doesn’t necessarily equate to efficiency in viewer recollection, however.  In fact, new research released by Nielsen IAG found that the top four most memorable TV commercials which launched in 2009 included brands that did not spend the most on their respective campaigns in 2009. The two most recalled ads for Flomax promoted awareness of BPH treatment, followed by the HPV vaccine Gardasil and newcomer, anti-depressant Pristiq – were not among the year’s largest spenders for TV advertising by a long-shot.</p>
<p><strong>2009 Most Recalled Prescription Drug/Vaccine Ads</strong></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Length (seconds)</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>45 &amp; 60</td>
<td>141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>45 &amp; 60</td>
<td>139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Gardasil</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Pristiq</td>
<td>75</td>
<td>135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Aricept</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Orencia</td>
<td>75</td>
<td>133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Plavix</td>
<td>60 &amp; 75</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Viagra</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Cialis</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Flomax</td>
<td>60</td>
<td>121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>“As with any category of advertising on TV today challenged with the need to cut-through the clutter and drive awareness and ultimately, persuade target viewers to take action, creativity and clarity are essential ingredients for effective and efficient ad development and deployment.  Pharmaceutical drug ads are not exempt from this challenge,” said Fariba Zamaniyan, Senior Vice President within the healthcare practice of Nielsen IAG.</p>
<p>While TV spending for prescription drug advertising has declined over the years, a number of factors contributed to that decline: fewer drug launches, the economic downturn and the increasing scrutiny by the FDA for prescription drug ads to increase the clarity of the delivery of product claim information in the ads. Stricter guidelines have forced an increase in ad length for many prescription advertisers which has resulted in extended ad lengths and ultimately, higher costs. In fact, the number of Rx ads that are greater than 60 seconds in length has nearly tripled since from 2006 to 2009.</p>
<p>“Longer ad lengths has further compounded the pressure marketers in this space already feel to build break-through advertising,” said Ms. Zamaniyan.  “However, longer length ads do not drop the bar when it comes to achieving goals.  Several ads in the top 10 most recalled new ads of 2009 include ad lengths greater than 60 seconds which further demonstrates that compelling and unique creative executions will help you stand out from the rest even if the ad is more than one-minute long.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/most-recalled-drug-commercials-are-not-the-biggest-spenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kia Rolls Home With Nielsen’s Top Auto Ad Award</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/kia-rolls-home-with-nielsen%e2%80%99s-top-auto-ad-award/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/kia-rolls-home-with-nielsen%e2%80%99s-top-auto-ad-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York International Auto Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Automotive Advertising Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen IAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kia Motors was the big winner at the 2010 Nielsen Automotive Advertising Awards, earning the title of Most Effective Automotive Ad of the Year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kia Motors was the big winner at the 2010 Nielsen Automotive Advertising Awards, earning the title of Most Effective Automotive Ad of the Year.</p>
<p>In the winning TV ad, streets are occupied by hamsters running in place on exercise wheels until a red Kia Soul pulls up to a stoplight as the passenger window rolls down to reveal a trio of music-loving hamsters who have found “A New Way to Roll.”</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="295" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/i8eKU3CP_m8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="295" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/i8eKU3CP_m8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>The ad was found most effective by Nielsen’s panel of 2.5 million television viewers who answered questions about how much they remembered about the programs and commercials they watched the previous evening throughout the past year. Only TV ads that launched in 2009 were eligible for nomination.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our data show that truly effective advertising starts with a great creative idea,&#8221; said Lois Miller, President of Nielsen Automotive. &#8220;When you combine that idea with a memorable and unique hook that grabs the viewer&#8217;s attention, you are going to get the results that we saw from Kia this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was the fourth year of Nielsen’s Automotive Advertising Awards, which were once again held at the opening breakfast of the New York International Auto Show. Nielsen also distributed awards to Ford for “Green Ad of the Year” and to Toyota for “Sales Event Campaign of the Year.”</p>
<p><strong>The Social Media Effect</strong><br />
But it was Kia whose ad stood out as the best of the best. To maximize its success on TV, the company carried the message to social media, which is now becoming standard practice for marketers both in and out of the auto industry.</p>
<p>“Even before we could get our own copy of the ad online, fans had already found it and posted it on YouTube,” said Michael Sprague, Kia’s Chief Marketing Officer. “Within a couple of months we saw that the ad had a total of over a million online views.”</p>
<p>As Nielsen’s Miller is quick to point out, consumers aren’t just viewing videos on the web; they’re talking about them as well.</p>
<p>“Social media is a living, breathing channel and many companies are scrambling to understand it,” said Miller. “Fortunately, Nielsen can measure social buzz and can give insight into whether marketers are creating positive or negative sentiment in these spaces.”</p>
<h3>Watch Automotive marketers and consumers discuss social media&#8217;s impact</h3>
<p id="preview"><script src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/videos/swfobject.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
var s1 = new SWFObject('http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/videos/player.swf','player','450','300','9');
s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
s1.addParam('flashvars','file=http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/videos/NielsenAutomotiveAwards.m4v&#038;image=http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/videos/nielsen_video_tn.png');
s1.write('preview');
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<p>Whether viewed online or over the airwaves, consumers were able to connect – and connect positively – to Kia’s marketing effort. And that means TV and Internet audiences haven’t seen the last of those hamsters.</p>
<p>“We never envisioned this ad being as popular and effective as it’s become,” said Sprague. “Stay tuned. You’re going to see more hamsters coming this summer.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/kia-rolls-home-with-nielsen%e2%80%99s-top-auto-ad-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

