<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Long Tail of the Net &#8211; Just How Important is it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:10:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-29616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346#comment-29616</guid>
		<description>this data looks flawed IMO -- you define -- short tail sites by traffic  (those with a greater than 1 percent reach), not by content focus. Then you conclude that it you reach less then 1 percent than you are &quot;niche content and service-oriented site&quot; -- that&#039;s apples and oranges.  This shows that the sites with the biggest reach  have more visits, time on site and pageviews per person -- yeah, no kidding, but hardly proves your point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this data looks flawed IMO &#8212; you define &#8212; short tail sites by traffic  (those with a greater than 1 percent reach), not by content focus. Then you conclude that it you reach less then 1 percent than you are &quot;niche content and service-oriented site&quot; &#8212; that&#039;s apples and oranges.  This shows that the sites with the biggest reach  have more visits, time on site and pageviews per person &#8212; yeah, no kidding, but hardly proves your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Destination Talent » &#8220;Just try stuff&#8217; and other musings at Recruittech Conference</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-15440</link>
		<dc:creator>Destination Talent » &#8220;Just try stuff&#8217; and other musings at Recruittech Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346#comment-15440</guid>
		<description>[...] later blog post. Meanwhile, have a look at the Long Tail concept, the controversies and the latest fascinating results from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] later blog post. Meanwhile, have a look at the Long Tail concept, the controversies and the latest fascinating results from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nielsen Wire</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12298</link>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346#comment-12298</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Our definition of the long-tail was not based on usage.  Sites in the long-tail are those that have under 1% of reach.  The usage metrics here are for those sites that fall into that category.

Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Our definition of the long-tail was not based on usage.  Sites in the long-tail are those that have under 1% of reach.  The usage metrics here are for those sites that fall into that category.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Motherwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-long-tail-of-the-net-just-how-important-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-11831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Motherwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=14346#comment-11831</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get your point.

The long tail is described as: &quot;The tail of a distribution that represents the rare occurrence of extreme values;&quot; 

Can a site be &quot;long tail&quot;, and can the curve be described by usage? That seems... well... wrong... because the metrics used to measure this are a self-fulfilling prophecy. 

The top sites have the most engagement therefore are the top sites. Seems like the premise proves the conclusion, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get your point.</p>
<p>The long tail is described as: &#8220;The tail of a distribution that represents the rare occurrence of extreme values;&#8221; </p>
<p>Can a site be &#8220;long tail&#8221;, and can the curve be described by usage? That seems&#8230; well&#8230; wrong&#8230; because the metrics used to measure this are a self-fulfilling prophecy. </p>
<p>The top sites have the most engagement therefore are the top sites. Seems like the premise proves the conclusion, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

