iPhone vs. Android

June 4, 2010

Don Kellogg, Senior Manager, Research and Insights/Telecom Practice, The Nielsen Company

Whether it‘s checking email on the go, connecting with friends through social networks or using turn-by-turn navigation, the capabilities of smartphones are convincing more and more consumers to make the leap from a simple mobile phone to a more sophisticated device.  As of Q1 ‘10, Nielsen data shows that 23% of mobile consumers now have a smartphone, up from just 16% in Q2 ‘09.

smartphone-penetration

Vying for their share of the smartphone market are two of the tech industry’s fiercest competitors:  Apple, with its iconic iPhone, and Google, with its fast-growing Android operating system.

Between Q4 ’09 and Q1 ’10, Android and iPhone’s share of the smartphone market grew by 2% each. At the same time, smartphone leader Blackberry lost 2% share to fall to 35% of all smartphones while Microsoft’s Windows Mobile OS also lost 2% to fall to 19%.

smartphone-share

Although Android and iPhone users both skew male (Android users show a 54/46 gender split compared to iPhone’s 55/45), there are some striking differences. Android users tend to be slightly younger than their iPhone peers- 55% of Android users are under the age of 34 — while just 47% of iPhone users fall within the same demographic. As is usually the case, age is also a prime determinant of income and education, with Android users slightly less wealthy and less educated.

smartphone-demo

Perhaps what sets iPhone and Android apart from the rest of the field of smartphones is operating system loyalty. 80% of iPhone users want their next device to run iPhone OS while 70% of Android users want another Android device. This is in stark comparison to other major smartphone players: only 47% of Blackberry users want another Blackberry while only 34% of Windows Mobile users want another Windows Mobile device.

Among Android and iPhone users who would like to switch operating systems, the rate at which Android users would like to try iPhone is twice as high as that of iPhone users who would try Android. Given that iPhone penetration is three times that of Android, more iPhone consumers are willing to try Android.

next-os

Finally, usage profiles for Android and iPhone are more like each other than the rest of the smartphone market. With a broader selection of titles available to them, predictably iPhone customers are more likely to have downloaded a game or played online, but Android users appear to be using their phones for a wide range of activities as well. Android users were more likely to engage in file-transfer activities like downloading ringtones, pictures, wallpaper and uploads.

Apps

For press inquiries or for more information on this article contact Nielsen
Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Posts

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/gwalter Gary Walter

    Interesting to note is how iPhone users use more email than Android users. This would fit with the age demographics, as younger users (and those of us ahead of the curve), rely less and less on email, and more on other social media platforms.

    I also find the loyalty issue interesting. A smaller percentage of iPhone users would be willing to switch OS than Android users. To me this would represent the fierce loyalty that Apple has built into their brand. In addition, the barely out of beta Android, is not for late adopters, non-techy, or the faint of heart. In addition, Android is less branded to the OS, and more to carriers and phone manufacturers.

    When I was talking about waiting for the Android, several of my iPhone-using friends, state staunch resistance to anything but an iPhone. They wouldn't even consider something else. Interestingly, the iPhone was their first smartphone. For me, I'd already progressed from Windows Mobile (2001-2007), Blackberry (2007-2010), and now Android. For those unaccustomed to smart phone, the evolutionary leap was huge – which would explain their loyalty and fascination.

    Apple was smart, they hit early, blew Palm, Windows, and most significantly, Blackberry out of the water. Established their brand, their market saturation, and they did it well. It will be interesting to see where we are in 10 years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=19002524 Ben Hoagland

    I would be interested in seeing a breakdown of distribution by age per OS. I feel this would explain a large amount of the impacts on education and income. For example, Android has the largest share of "Some College" possibly indicating mostly current college students. This effect would influence the interpretation of the income difference as college students typically have little to no income. Just my thoughts. Thanks for the info.

  • http://alexandretestu.com Alexandre

    I don't understand… Gartner says Symbian holds 44% of the smartphone marketshare in May 2010: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1372013

    What am I missing?

  • Peter Mueller

    research method? how did you get this datas together? npd sees anroid selling better than iphone… absolut the opposite.

  • Sean

    both iphone and android are capable platforms. We'll see if the openness of Android keeps it growing wildly over the next couple months.

  • http://twitter.com/rio517 @rio517

    Very interesting, but I'm surprised that Android's market share is so weak considering that I've seen reports that Android based web traffic surpassed iPhone traffic last month, while your survey shows Android/iPhone to be at about the same level in terms of usage in the past 30 days.

    I wonder if it's possible that people are misreporting their OS. Anecdotally, I have two Droid owners in my family and neither knew they were running Android until I told them. Do you also have any statistics on Android awareness that you could share?

  • Hamranhansenhansen

    Does Android v1.6 still represent 75% of Android installed base? It seems like there are really 2 Android platforms: v1.6 seems to have replaced some Windows Mobile devices and v2 seems to be a Verizon/Sprint iPhone.

  • http://twitter.com/manojtirkey @manojtirkey

    What is the methodology? What are the defining features of a 'smartphone'? The representation is incomplete without these details.

  • http://twitter.com/gr @gr

    Is this States-side or worldwide?

  • M. Frazier

    Great article. Concise, easily understood and covering questions that one wants answered.

  • http://twitter.com/fluffymaccoy @fluffymaccoy

    Where does your data set come from? Is it for North America only

  • Ted

    Is the income household or the individual with the phone?

  • http://keepkalm.com Kyle Alm

    Very cool graphs. Looks like Android is on the 2% growth plateau with Apple.

    I like the graph that shows what existing users want to try next. iPhone has 80% brand loyalty compared to 70% of Droid users.

  • desktoparchitecture

    I am greatly surprised that Apple and Android are drawing equall loyalty in the market.Apple is about to enter its vers. 4 of its OS while Android is only now entering its 2nd version of it's OS. This tells me that Android is gaining acceptance more rapidly amoungst its target user's than is Apple. I would like to see a comparison of the advertising of each OS side by side with the acceptance of the OS and the sales of the models of the phones. i have a feeling that Google with it's Android Phones is getting a larger bang for it's buck than is Apple with its IPhone dollar?

  • Guest from HK

    How does the Nielson Company define Smartphone? I am surprised to see Symbian occupied only 2% in the market. Are handsets running S40 or S60 being considered as Smartphones?

  • Trisped

    Sources? It looks to me like they are reporting current usage statistics instead of sales statistics (I am more use to sales). Also, I am trying to figure out where the salary info is coming from.

  • gaib

    You make some interesting points but I don't think you can say Android is gaining acceptance more rapidly. This data is only for the current iPhone and Droid OS. For all we know (unless Nielson has done this same poll before), Apple had the same acceptance rate with earlier entries as well. In terms of advertising dollars, it seems to me most of Apple's ads are in static media (billboards and signs, etc) while Android has had many TV spots. I have no marketing background whatsoever so I have no idea of the relative costs of these different campaign styles, but I would imagine TV spots are more expensive.

  • Mark

    Looks to be U.S. national stats as the title on each graph says ‘Mobile Insights, National’. How can this be so radically different than other reports from February?

  • ed kopkas

    Also interesting to note that BlackBerry still has the greatest market share, although people are talking about them as if they were a dinosaur. What do y'all think – can they hold on?

  • http://twitter.com/prabhasp prabhasp

    How about some BlackBerry and Windows Mobile demographics? I can take a crack at the BlackBerry demographics, but seriously, who is using Windows Mobile phones?

  • LukeD

    Who's playing mobile games? What the age demo? And distribution by OS?

  • Sam

    NPD results state that Android is outselling iPhone in Q1 2010, but Nielsen is examining overall smartphone marketshare.

  • DGBH

    Symbian is still the world's #1 most installed smartphone OS period.
    Andiod and the iPhone barely exist outside of NA, folks.

  • Tom Ross

    Considering that Verizon spent $100 million in the US to sell a couple million Droids over the last 6 months while Apple spent $500 million worldwide across their 4 product lines (Mac, iPod, iPhone, iPad) over the last 12 months to sell about 95 million devices plus lots of software and media content, I would say that Apple is more effective.

    Nevertheless, the Verizon campaign was crucial for Android. Android would be only half as big without it. It gave Android a core market on the biggest US carrier and some critical mass that it can now throw around in Europe and Asia, where it hasn't had any success so far.

  • http://www.facebook.com/davidbry David Bry

    I have an iPhone, but since I have 2 businesses, I needed a 2nd, separate line. I decided to go with the new Sprint HTC EVO. While I guess I would say Android is not bad, I really like the simplicity and ease of use of the iPhone, not to mention the apps are still way ahead of Android. I bank with Chase for my business and Android does not have an app for Chase. I am sending the EVO back more than likely. I enjoyed your comment, very well written.

  • http://www.facebook.com/davidbry David Bry

    If and when Verizon and Sprint start selling the iPhone, they will gain even more market share.

  • Guest

    Everyone needs to remember this study is for much longer than a month. The past month data shows that Android is finally gotten where it needs to be with 2.1 and the new Incredible at Verizon. If nothing else Android will outpace the iPhone as they have many more potential customers being on more carriers.

  • D S

    The article misses the number that matter most as far as OS penetration in the US. What carrier do you have and are you willing to leave them for a phone? I have Verizon so, I'll be buying my first smart phone a droid as iPhone is not an option. I doubt I'll ever switch if Droid stays usable with tons of apps. Either way I'd never go to AT&T for an iPhone.

    Droid just became an option and I suspect this study is much longer term than the past month. I predict availability and openness will allow Droid to take major market share. Everyone I know on Verizon is drooling at the thought of trading in Blackberry's for Droids. I think Droid=MS Windows while the iPhone=Mac. We'll see.

  • Allen

    Interesting.. That says alot about college students. All that loyalty might carry with them as they enter a higher income bracket in the workplace.

  • http://twitter.com/robertritz88 @robertritz88

    These numbers show how different Android and iPhone users are.

    The iPhone pulls ahead by around 10% in just one category (online game playing). Yet Android has four categories the users participate in over the iPhone (SMS, MMS, Ringtone Downloads, and Wallpaper Downloads).

    All of the other categories are less than a 10% difference. Lets think about this, assuming users will use features on the platform that make it stand out, the iPhone has a better online gaming experience, while the younger age group seeking identity is SMSing, MMSing, downloading ringtones, and downloading wallpapers.

    Overall the only major difference I see is preference for curation over freedom of information. iPhone users enjoy the apps, but also prefer the closed environment and the safety that allows (to me that is older people). Android users enjoy the ability to reach out and do what they want, when they want (to me that is younger users).

    Obviously this is too simple to be a valid conclusion, I believe it explains these numbers quite well.

    I will be posting an article about this on my website, robertritz.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/dusthead Jason Allen Morris

    that data is from the UK…or Europe area…this is US.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=639291828 Andreas B. Iversen

    Gartner looks at worldwide figures while Nielsen only looks at US figures. Symbian (Nokia) is much stronger in other regions eg. Europe, which explains the difference.

  • The_Omega_Man

    "As is usually the case, age is also a prime determinant of income and education, with Android users slightly less wealthy and less educated."

    Hmmm. An interesting statement to make! Especially, if taken out of context! It could appear to imply that the average Android user is relatively poor or of more meager means than their iPhone wielding counterparts and potentially not as smart as the average iPhone owner!……. :O

    And the fact that the Moto-Droid 16GB (@$599 list $299 2yr ) cost the effectively same as the iPhone 3GS 16GB ($599 list $199 2yr)! And I believe that Original N1 owners had to shell out full price only initially in January! So if this statement has any ring of truth in it, it shows that Android owners may make less money (apparently due to liberal speculation about their age to income demographic), but are willing to part with a chuck of their hard earned cash, just to have and Android phone! Now some may argue that this validates the second part of that original statement!

    However, when you look at the total cost of that Android owner's smart phone investment, as compared to an iPhone owner (doing the same things with their smart phones), the Android owners will likely come out ahead! This is because the real money spent and the value gleaned here, is not on the phone or just the carrier plans, but rather the cost of the Apps and licensed media content over time!
    Many very usable Android apps are Free or very low cost, today. And with that cadre of usable 3rd party Apps. multi-tasking, the Android owners have the potential to be more productive with their time (value). Just a thought on this one statement.

  • The_Omega_Man

    Keep in mind Android has gone from 1 phone on one U.S. carriers to what we see here, in LESS than one year! Q4 2009 to Q1 2010! It is now represented on all U.S. carriers and many international with more than 50 products (introduced and planned) from dozens of manufactures and OHA members + the growth of over 60,000 Apps in that same period! Also Android is not limited to just smart-phones! I'd say that this is not bad for almost 2 solid quarters! While Apple has it's captured, elegant and well run , tightly integrated and tightly controlled eco-system, Android has incredible ubiquity and great potential to develop more broad and open integration, which is it's real strength. Strength, in numbers, diversity and support! Quite literally, Power to the People!

  • http://www.anythingreal.com Michael

    To DGBH: "Symbian is still the world's #1 most installed smartphone OS period.
    Andiod and the iPhone barely exist outside of NA, folks."
    Where do you get this information? Can you please cite a credible source?

  • Russell Phillips

    Gary it's so nice to see a smart, intelligent, well informed and balanced comment here instead of the usual fanboy drivel. Sir I applaud you.

  • Jeremy

    I don't recall being ask for or participating in a survey, so their data set is must be figures drawn from the companies rather then consumers. The fact that they don't show whether or not it's a North American versus Worldwide consumers makes me question the validity of their reports, for some figures such as the "loyalty" graph does not have a control group who do not use either of these phones, nor does it show anything in regards to "switching" users for a specified time period. All of those would be great to help support it's claims, who ever worked on this project for this report should go back to school and learn how to operate a true unfalable test between these phones. The only real difference I see is that the IPhone is also an IPod and has much more storage capabilities then any of the Android OS phones, which should not be a factor in the near future.

  • http://www.evolvinginteractive.com Mark

    The most important thing I take away from the data is that Iphone and Android are gaining market share at the expense of Blackberry and Windows Mobile. "80% of iPhone users want their next device to run iPhone OS while 70% of Android users want another Android device…only 47% of Blackberry users want another Blackberry."

    I thought that Blackberry and Iphone targeted slightly different consumers (Blackberry is the smartphone for business people, Iphone is the smartphone for the masses). It appears the fate of Blackberry is tied closely to Iphone AND Android.

  • http://blog.aparicio.org Sam Aparicio

    When you get down to the practical level of choosing one device vs the other, especially in a small business context, it's important to identify what each device does better.

    I wrote a iphone vs android hype-free article over at the Ringio blog.

  • http://www.rightsourcemarketing.com Mike

    Great post, chock full of stats that may serve as predictors of who will dominate the smartphone market moving forward. In particular like the "Data Features Used in the Last 30 Days" graph, as I imagine features will drive adoption.

    For the SMB market, Sam Aparicio from Ringio posted his iPhone vs. Android comparison – gives some pros and cons for the business owner trying to choose between the two:
    http://www.ringio.com/2010/06/29/iphone-vs-androi...

  • http://twitter.com/lynda_rva @lynda_rva

    The Android I have had, LG Ally, is not ready for primetime. It has a lot of bugs and inconsistencies. LG and Verizon support techs are not well trained on the product. I switched from Verizon to AT&T for the IPhone (and I hate Verizon), but AT&T service coverage was so bad that I canceled. I am still an anti-Verizon customer, using it because of the coverage only, and yet I would prefer to be with IPhone/AT&T than to deal with the issues I have with Verizon and their Android. The Android Apps have a lot of bugs to them and they are more costly than the Iphone Apps. I hate my LG Ally and I am not alone. BTW, I am an Apple addict.

  • jmaz

    When talking about future trends, everything is moot until you consider the big picture. And that will have more bearing than whether more Iphones or more Android phones are sold. More important than the hardware and the OS'es sales is the common sense expectation that when we say mobile we mostly mean the management of mobile data.

    Apple, forces you and locks you into being tied to your desktop in order for you to manage the data in your phone. Plus, it is data mostly geared to media consumption.

    Google, pulls you into the cloud where your data, any data, can be managed from your phone.

    Now, I ask you which one of these two ways of interacting and managing your mobile data do you think has a better future?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/fariseu Syed Faris Hussain

    I have to say, that android text input looks a lot better than the iPhone. I have an iPhone and hopefully they'll make the text input more similar to the android text input.

  • Gentry

    Just so you know, I'm 57, female, had a windows smart phone and chose an Android over IPhone. I use mine for work as well as personal use.

  • Neil

    just give it some time.
    symbian is very popular overseas, but it's quite limited in comparison to the features that these two bring forth. i see it as only a matter of time….
    take it from someone who has used symbian for quite a few years now

  • Kim

    … over 40% of iPhone users make over 100k a year?! Am I reading that right?! Didn’t realise you had to be so wealthy to own an iPhone, I have one and never considered that most people were rich that have them. When I graduate I’ll be lucky if I ever make 40k a year.

  • Rexen

    But since that is where myself and millions of others live along with Apple, Google, RIM, that is what's most important to us.

  • Rexen

    D S…I think you are close. But in true comparisons I think Droid = Linux while you are dead on Iphone = Mac/Apple. I can't stand the very special Iphone electrical interface, factory service required for battery replacement, and lack of a micro SD memory card. I have used 2 BBerry and 2 Windows based, & have many friends with Iphone, some have the newest one. And I plan on getting a Droid in the new few months.

  • http://twitter.com/hickeroar @hickeroar

    I think it's less about "openness" and more about configurability. Most consumers don't really comprehend what "open" even means. However, being able to change just about any aspect of their phone is a big winner.

    It definitely won me over when I recently switched away from iOS to Android (Galaxy S). I've been able to turn this phone on its head since I got it. Win.

  • Captain

    Blog post

    Not certain why any Apple hating robot Droid boy bothers to open their mouth (I'm actually picturing filthy Cheeto dust covered ergo keyboards, but that's for another rant).  It sounds like the blubbering owner of a 1968 Fiat; first comparing then complaining about the lack of a backseat and how often you need new tires in the 68 Corvette, the one he's never even sat in!!!

    It's kinda like comparing Travis Barker & Neil Peart… Don't get me started!!!

    First off, the Google design is an unflattering, poorly executed ripoff.  It's about as original as Windows 7's Glossy transparent png buttons and Widgets, uhh "Gadgets" (courtesy 2002's OS X).  The interface is a poor implementation of the ripped-off theme (rounded edge square icons, for crying out loud!), even the name "Droid" is a ripoff from 1970's Lucasfilm… Im still surprised there wasn't a lawsuit. I'm pretty sure Lucas owns all intellectual property surrounding "Jedi, Force, and Droid". Maybe the "Motorola Wookie" would have been too obvious?

    The big manufacturers of cellular history had plenty of time (15-20 years) to develop kick ass phones but they squat idle on lame soap-bars and flip-bricks till Apple up's the game and paved the road with non-stylus Touch, usable browser, usable email and enough gaming horsepower to put Nintendo on the X-Mas wish list back burner. The enterprise players couldnt be bothered to get their pricey R&D wheels dirty. That money is better spent on commercials and self congratulatory parties.  Microsoft has been shafting it to Apple for 30+ years so it's a trend that ol wrinkly Steve Jobs is used to. Apple elaborated on the IBM concept of the UI, fixed a dead idea and invented the computers we know today, Microsoft cashed the check… Now here comes Google, second verse, same as the first…………

    Motorola, Nokia, Palm, RIM and Sony definitely paved the way for mobile devices but it took Apple to actually make handheld technology exciting. The best thing available back then was the Motorola Razr&, Blackberry 8000's and that Palm Treo… Neat, but not at all great. Not enough to push the industry where we all want it. 

    Now please, enough complaining about Apple prices. The cost of Apple gear fund's the non-disputed world class design engineering for a few Lincoln's more than the copy-cats. The same design engineering that spawned your blessed Droid. 

    I know atleast 15 iPhone 4 owners (new and upgraders). No one had any problems,  complaints, no one returned the phone, no one dropped a call! It was all Engadget/Gizmodo hype because they got in trouble for the possession of stolen property. Sounds like the biggest "look yonder" cover-up in geek history. We certainly haven't seen stolen Samsung's stir up any interest in the media, but I suppose somebody needs to run that old & busted Flash technology.  Then the hateable Apple gets criticized by the ignoramus for making good on free cases to shut people up.  What ever happened to the 57 flavors of Droid hardware that are also having "antennagate" (stupid Engadget made up word) issues getting cases?? Probably none available yet because like Dell, Asus, or HP's halfway house for hodgepodge hardware, there are no design standards to match them up to… What happened to Quality over Quantity? 57 variants of hardware with 57 flavors of Droid OS vs the iPhone. 

    "One More Thing" (couldn't resist) ….. If you want to predict the future of your next MS OS or Droid toy just stay tuned to the next Apple event in Janruary 2011… Be sure to watch the event and hate-blog shamefully on your sub-par RIPOFF device. It's ok though; someone needs to buy em, someone needs to buy that Fiat. That moderate competition and flattering copy-cat'ism encourages Apple to improve on THEIR original design. 

  • http://www.tsar3000.com TSAR3000

    thanks for this great info, indeed I did not know that the blackberry OS is so big in the market!!
    that shocked me.

  • Andrew Brown

    anyone know where i can find a similar study for European usage only?

  • Sean Schroeder

    Also, while Apple is branding a phone, Google is marketing an OS.

blog comments powered by Disqus