<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Social Networking, Women use Mobile More Than Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-social-networking-women-use-mobile-more-than-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-social-networking-women-use-mobile-more-than-men/</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:10:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Asner</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-social-networking-women-use-mobile-more-than-men/comment-page-1/#comment-28498</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Asner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=20510#comment-28498</guid>
		<description>The chart showing &quot;mobile social network usage by age&quot; seems to be a bit misleading. While the 35-54 year old group appears to be the majority, that group also covers a 20 year age range, as compared to the 7 year range covered by the 18-24 year old group. 
 
If these groups were divided into comparably sized segments (i.e. breaking 35-54 into three groups of 6 or 7 year intervals), wouldn&#039;t these percentages shift drastically? If distribution is equal among that 35-54 group, the segments would be slightly smaller than the 18-24 group. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart showing &quot;mobile social network usage by age&quot; seems to be a bit misleading. While the 35-54 year old group appears to be the majority, that group also covers a 20 year age range, as compared to the 7 year range covered by the 18-24 year old group. </p>
<p>If these groups were divided into comparably sized segments (i.e. breaking 35-54 into three groups of 6 or 7 year intervals), wouldn&#39;t these percentages shift drastically? If distribution is equal among that 35-54 group, the segments would be slightly smaller than the 18-24 group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

