<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama and McCain&#8217;s Ads: Equally &#8220;Negative&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:10:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Mistake on Obama&#8217;s Negative Ads &#171; KELVIN LEGAL</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-2030</link>
		<dc:creator>A Mistake on Obama&#8217;s Negative Ads &#171; KELVIN LEGAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-2030</guid>
		<description>[...] Nielsen Wire website always says roughly the same thing: Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nielsen Wire website always says roughly the same thing: Despite finger-pointing from both sides, Barack Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Claim is False</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Claim is False</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>[...] Nielsen Media Research says that from June 3, when the Democratic primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,238 negative ads against Obama, and the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nielsen Media Research says that from June 3, when the Democratic primaries ended, through Sept. 7, the most recent reporting period, the McCain campaign ran 76,238 negative ads against Obama, and the Obama campaign placed 75,246 negative commercials against McCain. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Attacking Negative Ads</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Attacking Negative Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>[...] in McCain&#8217;s ratio of negative ads. From the end of the primaries and through the conventions, Barack Obama and McCain were about even. According to Nielsen, McCain aired 76,238 negative ads in that span and Obama ran [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in McCain&#8217;s ratio of negative ads. From the end of the primaries and through the conventions, Barack Obama and McCain were about even. According to Nielsen, McCain aired 76,238 negative ads in that span and Obama ran [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Attacking Negative Ads</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Attacking Negative Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>[...] in McCain&#8217;s ratio of negative ads. From the end of the primaries and through the conventions, Barack Obama and McCain were about even. According to Nielsen, McCain aired 76,238 negative ads in that span and Obama ran [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in McCain&#8217;s ratio of negative ads. From the end of the primaries and through the conventions, Barack Obama and McCain were about even. According to Nielsen, McCain aired 76,238 negative ads in that span and Obama ran [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jpav</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jpav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>After looking at the two ads, it is clear to me that the McCain ad is negative and the Obama ad is not negative (or much less negative).  Why?  The McCain ad is filled with falsehoods (lies) while the Obama ad just highlights facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking at the two ads, it is clear to me that the McCain ad is negative and the Obama ad is not negative (or much less negative).  Why?  The McCain ad is filled with falsehoods (lies) while the Obama ad just highlights facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama meaner than McCain in FL</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama meaner than McCain in FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>[...] The top-running anti-McCain ad is below. More here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The top-running anti-McCain ad is below. More here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama meaner than McCain in FL</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCain &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama meaner than McCain in FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>[...] The top-running anti-McCain ad is below. More here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The top-running anti-McCain ad is below. More here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>Measuring Negativity on its own is not a criteria that makes sense in this case. The important difference is which campaign featured more misleading and nonfactual information.  The McCain campaign was rightly derided for their lies, not so much for their negativity. I don&#039;t have a real problem if a commercial runs telling me that such and such a candidate voted against the minimum wage increases over 19 times in the last year, if it is accurate.  However, an ad stating that a candidate is going to raise my taxes when it isn&#039;t true; that&#039;s just plain lying.  Of course, both ads are negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Measuring Negativity on its own is not a criteria that makes sense in this case. The important difference is which campaign featured more misleading and nonfactual information.  The McCain campaign was rightly derided for their lies, not so much for their negativity. I don&#8217;t have a real problem if a commercial runs telling me that such and such a candidate voted against the minimum wage increases over 19 times in the last year, if it is accurate.  However, an ad stating that a candidate is going to raise my taxes when it isn&#8217;t true; that&#8217;s just plain lying.  Of course, both ads are negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>What the heck do you mean by negative? Do you mean a legitimate attack, a distortion of an opponents record, or both??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck do you mean by negative? Do you mean a legitimate attack, a distortion of an opponents record, or both??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NielsenWire</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-and-mccains-ads-equally-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>NielsenWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=1937#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Brett and CrazyIrishman-

Nielsen defines any ad in which either candidate focuses on criticizing his opponent as &quot;negative.&quot;  

Ads in which the candidates promote their own qualifications for office are certainly not considered &quot;negative&quot; -- nor are ads in which either candidate only briefly criticizes his opponent.  

In order to be considered &quot;negative,&quot; the majority of an ad must be devoted to criticizing the candidate&#039;s opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett and CrazyIrishman-</p>
<p>Nielsen defines any ad in which either candidate focuses on criticizing his opponent as &#8220;negative.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Ads in which the candidates promote their own qualifications for office are certainly not considered &#8220;negative&#8221; &#8212; nor are ads in which either candidate only briefly criticizes his opponent.  </p>
<p>In order to be considered &#8220;negative,&#8221; the majority of an ad must be devoted to criticizing the candidate&#8217;s opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

