<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Executives Discuss The DTV Transition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsen-executives-discuss-the-dtv-transition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsen-executives-discuss-the-dtv-transition/</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:43:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norman Elliss</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsen-executives-discuss-the-dtv-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Elliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7265#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>We are on the fringe area. Our antenna will not pick up the weaker  hd stations.  we could pick up about 10 stations analog only 4 or 5  hd. our 2 tvs are both new.  So now we got dish and it&#039;s costing us over 40 dollars a month for over a hundred channels that we don&#039;t want. And we can&#039;t get the Topeka stations we watched the most.

      Norman Elliss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are on the fringe area. Our antenna will not pick up the weaker  hd stations.  we could pick up about 10 stations analog only 4 or 5  hd. our 2 tvs are both new.  So now we got dish and it&#8217;s costing us over 40 dollars a month for over a hundred channels that we don&#8217;t want. And we can&#8217;t get the Topeka stations we watched the most.</p>
<p>      Norman Elliss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McKelvey</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/nielsen-executives-discuss-the-dtv-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McKelvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=7265#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>This mandatory switch is a genuine hardship for a lot of people who, for whatever reason, do not subscribe to a satellite or cable provider. Those people don&#039;t know what they are missing, of course, when all they can get on their TVs are the drive-by networks. For people on fixed incomes, especially the older population with just Social Security, meeting increased costs for everything - including necessities like food and water - this &quot;conversion&quot; is an unnecessary downer. And for some it&#039;s their only recreation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This mandatory switch is a genuine hardship for a lot of people who, for whatever reason, do not subscribe to a satellite or cable provider. Those people don&#8217;t know what they are missing, of course, when all they can get on their TVs are the drive-by networks. For people on fixed incomes, especially the older population with just Social Security, meeting increased costs for everything &#8211; including necessities like food and water &#8211; this &#8220;conversion&#8221; is an unnecessary downer. And for some it&#8217;s their only recreation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
