<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Cosumer Insights, Breaking News, Press Releases, Research Whitepapers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NielsenWire" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Nov. E-Commerce Update: Sites With Highest Conversion Rates</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503775867/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nov-e-commerce-update-sites-with-highest-conversion-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[1800flowers.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blair.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conversion rates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[L.L. Bean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lands end]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Metrostyle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Office Depot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ProFlowers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[purchases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QVC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Sportsman's Guide]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tickets.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November, almost one-third (30.6%) of all visitors to ProFlowers.com made a purchase &#8212; the highest conversion percentage among all retail websites, according to Nielsen.
Metrostyle (23.6% conversion rate), QVC (21.6% conversion rate), Office Depot (21.6% conversion rate), L.L. Bean (21.5% conversion rate), Tickets.com (20.1% conversion rate), Blair.com (18.9% conversion rate), Lands End (18.4% conversion rate), ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/online_shopping.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6698" title="online_shopping" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/online_shopping-300x201.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a>In November, almost one-third (30.6%) of all visitors to ProFlowers.com made a purchase &#8212; the highest conversion percentage among all retail websites, according to Nielsen.</p>
<p>Metrostyle (23.6% conversion rate), QVC (21.6% conversion rate), Office Depot (21.6% conversion rate), L.L. Bean (21.5% conversion rate), Tickets.com (20.1% conversion rate), Blair.com (18.9% conversion rate), Lands End (18.4% conversion rate), 1800flowers.com (17.8% conversion rate), and The Sportsman&#8217;s Guide (16.8% conversion rate) rounded out the top ten.</p>
<p>Top online retailers in ten key product categories, ranked by purchases and customer numbers in November, are below.</p>
<p><span id="more-6695"></span></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Apparel and Accessories<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>4,393</td>
<td>1,659</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>J.C. Penney</td>
<td>988</td>
<td>812</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Victoria’s Secret</td>
<td>695</td>
<td>591</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Lands End</td>
<td>531</td>
<td>472</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Old Navy</td>
<td>521</td>
<td>464</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>DVD and Video<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>2,313</td>
<td>1,846</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>DirectGroup Bertelsmann</td>
<td>872</td>
<td>657</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>862</td>
<td>467</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Best Buy</td>
<td>233</td>
<td>194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Wal-Mart Stores</td>
<td>198</td>
<td>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Home and Garden<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>1,456</td>
<td>1,186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>1,058</td>
<td>666</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>J.C. Penney</td>
<td>784</td>
<td>654</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>QVC</td>
<td>480</td>
<td>372</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Target</td>
<td>429</td>
<td>382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Office Supplies<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customer<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Office Depot</td>
<td>1,387</td>
<td>757</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>VistaPrint</td>
<td>865</td>
<td>712</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Staples</td>
<td>438</td>
<td>325</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Hewlett Packard</td>
<td>146</td>
<td>139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>140</td>
<td>97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Health/Wellness/Beauty<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Avon</td>
<td>467</td>
<td>391</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>439</td>
<td>388</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Sephora</td>
<td>425</td>
<td>349</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>405</td>
<td>277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>QVC</td>
<td>363</td>
<td>246</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Consumer Electronics<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>1,040</td>
<td>916</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>878</td>
<td>571</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Wal-Mart Stores</td>
<td>410</td>
<td>381</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>AT&amp;T</td>
<td>371</td>
<td>290</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Apple Store</td>
<td>344</td>
<td>288</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Computer Software<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Symantec</td>
<td>319</td>
<td>309</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>McAfee</td>
<td>289</td>
<td>246</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>184</td>
<td>168</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>86</td>
<td>67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Jewelry and Watches<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>1,160</td>
<td>340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>QVC</td>
<td>271</td>
<td>204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Overstock.com</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>132</td>
<td>113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>HSN.com</td>
<td>122</td>
<td>77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Books<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>4,203</td>
<td>3,252</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>1,378</td>
<td>693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Barnes &amp; Noble</td>
<td>768</td>
<td>646</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>ChristianBook.com</td>
<td>120</td>
<td>106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Alibris</td>
<td>118</td>
<td>102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Toys, Games and Hobbies<br />
Online Retailers</th>
<th>Number of Purchases<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
<th>Number of Customers<br />
(in 000&#8217;s)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>eBay</td>
<td>4,118</td>
<td>1,489</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>2,146</td>
<td>1,694</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Wal-Mart Stores</td>
<td>1,003</td>
<td>825</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>ToysRUs</td>
<td>535</td>
<td>482</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Target</td>
<td>441</td>
<td>396</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company, MegaView Online Retail (November 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Read the full article on <a href="http://www.internetretailer.com/dailyNews.asp?id=28931" target="_blank">InternetRetailer.com</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503775867" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nov-e-commerce-update-sites-with-highest-conversion-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/nov-e-commerce-update-sites-with-highest-conversion-rates/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“Marley &amp; Me” Rings In New Year At Number One</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503785909/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/marley-me-rings-in-new-year-at-number-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[box office results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marley &amp; Me]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Year holiday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Box office earnings for the first weekend of the new year reached $123.2 million &#8211; down 28% from the prior weekend ($169.9 million), but up 10% compared to the same weekend a year ago ($112.5 million), Nielsen reported Monday.
Twentieth Century Fox&#8217;s &#8220;Marley &#38; Me&#8221; remained in the top spot for the second weekend running, with earnings of almost $24.3 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/movie-theater-200x3001.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6491" title="movie-theater-200x3001" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/movie-theater-200x3001.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>U.S. Box office earnings for the first weekend of the new year reached $123.2 million &#8211; down 28% from the prior weekend ($169.9 million), but up 10% compared to the same weekend a year ago ($112.5 million), Nielsen reported Monday.</p>
<p>Twentieth Century Fox&#8217;s &#8220;Marley &amp; Me&#8221; remained in the top spot for the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/holiday-movie-goers-flock-to-marley-me/" target="_blank">second weekend running</a>, with earnings of almost $24.3 million between Jan. 2 and 4.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/movie-goers-say-yes-to-carrey-comedy/" target="_blank"></a>Walt Disney Studios&#8217; &#8221;Bedtime Stories&#8221; claimed second place, with earnings of $20.5 million, and Paramount&#8217;s &#8220;The Curious Case of Benjamin Button&#8221; rounded out the top three, with an $18.7 million box office draw.</p>
<p>Below are the top 10 Box Office totals for the weekend of January 2-4, 2009, according to Nielsen EDI.</p>
<p><span id="more-6726"></span></p>
<p><!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank<br />
(By<br />
Weekend<br />
Gross)</th>
<th>Title</th>
<th>Studio</th>
<th>Weekend Gross<br />
(1/2 - 1/4)</th>
<th>Total Gross<br />
(Through 1/4/09)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>MARLEY &amp; ME</td>
<td>TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX</td>
<td>$24,263,763</td>
<td>$106,664,046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>BEDTIME STORIES</td>
<td>WALT DISNEY STUDIOS</td>
<td>$20,501,339</td>
<td>$85,539,168</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON</td>
<td>PARAMOUNT</td>
<td>$18,691,248</td>
<td>$79,297,086</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>VALKYRIE</td>
<td>MGM STUDIOS</td>
<td>$14,094,617</td>
<td>$60,743,921</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>YES MAN</td>
<td>WARNER BROS.</td>
<td>$13,910,477</td>
<td>$79,507,388</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>SEVEN POUNDS</td>
<td>SONY PICTURES</td>
<td>$10,068,518</td>
<td>$60,147,298</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>THE TALE OF DESPEREAUX</td>
<td>UNIVERSAL</td>
<td>$6,939,295</td>
<td>$43,661,775</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL</td>
<td>TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX</td>
<td>$5,049,698</td>
<td>$74,424,256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>DOUBT</td>
<td>MIRAMAX</td>
<td>$5,000,893</td>
<td>$18,705,481</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE</td>
<td>FOX SEARCHLIGHT</td>
<td>$4,690,769</td>
<td>$28,676,598</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company (January 2 - 4, 2009).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503785909" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/marley-me-rings-in-new-year-at-number-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/marley-me-rings-in-new-year-at-number-one/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What To Do About Web Advertising’s Total Lack Of Recall?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503468011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-to-do-about-web-advertisings-total-lack-of-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john burbank]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The column below, by John R. Burbank, CEO, Nielsen Online, was recently published in Adweek.
Want a firsthand lesson in the health of the Internet? Ask a friend a simple question: &#8220;What&#8217;s your favorite online ad?&#8221;
Chances are they&#8217;ll have a tough time giving an answer. Some may mention a dancing girl seducing you to refinance a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The column below, by <a href="http://nielsen.com/about/burbank.html" target="_blank">John R. Burbank</a>, CEO, Nielsen Online, was recently published in <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/community/columns/other-columns/e3ic8de2356a5754927cb0cd55182336960" target="_blank">Adweek</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cant_remember_guy.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6643" title="cant_remember_guy" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cant_remember_guy-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" /></a>Want a firsthand lesson in the health of the Internet? Ask a friend a simple question: &#8220;What&#8217;s your favorite online ad?&#8221;</p>
<p>Chances are they&#8217;ll have a tough time giving an answer. Some may mention a dancing girl seducing you to refinance a mortgage; others may bring up one of the online executions of the Mac vs. PC television campaign.</p>
<p>But many people cannot recall any online advertising, despite all the time each of us spends on the Web and the thousands of ads we&#8217;ve all seen.</p>
<p>Why isn&#8217;t there more memorable advertising on the Web? The answer is multifaceted, but the bottom line is simple: While the Web is working fine for search and direct response advertisers (&#8221;What&#8217;s your credit score?&#8221;; &#8220;Rent from Netflix!&#8221;), it has yet to blossom for products that aren&#8217;t regularly searched for or purchased online.</p>
<p><span id="more-6625"></span></p>
<p>This latter type of advertising, called &#8220;brand&#8221; in the lingo of the Web, relies on compelling, memorable creative to open the hearts or minds of consumers. Brand advertisers like Procter &amp; Gamble use TV as their standard for creative excellence, and so far, the Internet hasn&#8217;t met the challenge, despite its potential. Pages are too cluttered; consumers have grown &#8220;blind&#8221; to the industry-standard spaces; and metrics like &#8220;page views&#8221; or &#8220;impressions&#8221; encourage sites to expose us to as many ads as possible during our time online.</p>
<p>So, while brands continue to invest in the Web, and there have been many documented cases of ROI, the real money continues to stay in traditional media &#8212; TV, radio and even print &#8212; despite the Internet&#8217;s gains in audience.</p>
<p>Combined with a crappy economy, this presents a very bleak situation for great sites like Yahoo, AOL, Facebook, and The New York Times. These sites must profitably cover their investments in content and innovation, yet they can&#8217;t compete with Google for search dollars, and what they earn from direct response advertisers typically comes in the form of pennies-on-the-dollar remnant sales via ad networks.</p>
<p>The big sites need brand advertisers to come onto the Web and pay premium prices for the privilege. Fat chance in today&#8217;s environment.</p>
<p>So, what is to be done?</p>
<p>First, sites must devote better &#8212; not necessarily more &#8212; real estate to advertising, and reduce page clutter. As long as publishers offer small ads in a cluttered environment, advertisers will continue to invest elsewhere.</p>
<p>Second, publishers need to consider selling on the basis of time, not just impressions. A small ad blinking away for a few seconds may be optimal for direct response advertising, but it won&#8217;t help Oil of Olay convince you of the benefits of its latest age-defying formula. Sure, video advertising may help solve this in the future, but it cannot drive enough revenue to support the rest of the Web. And frequency &#8212; showing the same weak ad 12 times &#8212; doesn&#8217;t make Web advertising more compelling.</p>
<p>Lastly, the industry must avoid pinning shortfalls in revenue on the bad economy. Sure, the economy will have some effect. But unless more of us can easily name our favorite online ads, the problem is clearly more fundamental. Let&#8217;s use 2009 as the year to set the Web on the right course for long-term profitability by improving its effectiveness for brand advertisers.</p>
<p><em>Adweek is a unit of the Nielsen Co.</em></p>
<p><strong>Learn more about <a href="http://nielsen-online.com/blog/2008/10/02/what-is-ad-clutter-and-why-does-it-matter/" target="_blank">online ad clutter</a> and how it affects Internet users of <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/myspace-generation-avoiding-ad-clutter/" target="_blank">all ages</a>.</strong></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503468011" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-to-do-about-web-advertisings-total-lack-of-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/what-to-do-about-web-advertisings-total-lack-of-recall/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Buzzworthy Auto Brands Of 2008</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503468012/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-buzzworthy-auto-brands-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Automotive buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Julie Enzweiler, Nielsen Online
The automotive industry has witnessed an extremely volatile and game-changing 2008. With Ford, BMW, Honda, Toyota and Volkswagen leading the way, here is a look at the top 25 automotive brands that consumers discussed online in 2008 relative to all online discussion.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Julie Enzweiler, Nielsen Online</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6629" title="auto_logo_sm" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/auto_logo_sm.gif" alt="" width="150" height="81" />The automotive industry has witnessed an extremely volatile and game-changing 2008. With Ford, BMW, Honda, Toyota and Volkswagen leading the way, here is a look at the top 25 automotive brands that consumers discussed online in 2008 relative to all online discussion.</p>
<p><span id="more-6624"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top25_auto_lg.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6631" title="top25_auto_lg" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top25_auto_lg.gif" alt="" width="476" height="1086" /></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503468012" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-buzzworthy-auto-brands-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/most-buzzworthy-auto-brands-of-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trends With Byte: 2008 Blogosphere Buzz, By The Numbers</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503417777/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/trends-with-byte-2008-blogosphere-buzz-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corporate jet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hybrid car]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[telephone online]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online social network giants MySpace and Facebook battled for supremacy in 2008.  The trend lines below show the percentages of consumer-generated online discussions that mentioned each site between June and December:

 
Meanwhile, Twitter &#8217;s online buzz slowly picked up this fall, almost matching buzz levels for Web video goliath, YouTube:

 
The release of the new iPhone 3G generated a huge online buzz ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online social network giants MySpace and Facebook battled for supremacy in 2008.  The trend lines below show the percentages of consumer-generated online discussions that mentioned each site between June and December:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-1.bmp"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6535 alignnone" title="picture-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-1.bmp" alt="" width="457" height="284" /></a></p>
<p> <span id="more-6612"></span></p>
<p>Meanwhile, Twitter &#8217;s online buzz slowly picked up this fall, almost matching buzz levels for Web video goliath, YouTube:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.bmp"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6537 alignnone" title="picture-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.bmp" alt="" width="446" height="287" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The release of the new iPhone 3G generated a huge online buzz spike in July: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-3.bmp"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6539 alignnone" title="picture-3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-3.bmp" alt="" width="452" height="285" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Detroit auto industry executives&#8217; Congressional testimony in November also triggered a rash of blog discussions around the executives&#8217; mode of travel to Washington, D.C. &#8212; via corporate jet and, later, by hybrid car:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-4.bmp"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6543 alignnone" title="picture-4" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-4.bmp" alt="" width="444" height="277" /></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503417777" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/trends-with-byte-2008-blogosphere-buzz-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/trends-with-byte-2008-blogosphere-buzz-by-the-numbers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Primetime Broadcast Ratings, January 1, 2009</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503558478/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-january-1-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amer Funn Hm Videos-1/1(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CSI Special(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deal Or No Deal 1/1(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eleventh Hour-Spcl(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FedEx Orange Bowl(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[How I Met Your Mother-SP(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MNT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Office 1/1(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Private Practice SP-1/1(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rose Bowl-Post Game(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Big Bang Theory-SP(S)-01/01/2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[UNI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS&#8217;s &#8220;CSI&#8221; special claimed the top slot in Nielsen&#8217;s ranking of the top primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for New Years Day 2009.
NBC&#8217;s special presentation of &#8220;Deal Or No Deal&#8221; was the number two ranked primetime telecast, and FOX&#8217;s &#8220;FEDEX Orange Bowl&#8221; rounded out the top three.



Rank
Program
Network
Viewers (P2+)


1
CSI SPECIAL(S)-01/01/2009
CBS
9,760,000


2
DEAL OR NO DEAL 1/1(S)-01/01/2009
NBC
9,488,000


3
FEDEX ORANGE BOWL(S)-01/01/2009
FOX
9,319,000


4
ROSE BOWL-POST GAME(S)-01/01/2009
ABC
8,870,000


5
ELEVENTH HOUR ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS&#8217;s &#8220;CSI&#8221; special claimed the top slot in Nielsen&#8217;s ranking of the top primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for New Years Day 2009.</p>
<p>NBC&#8217;s special presentation of &#8220;Deal Or No Deal&#8221; was the number two ranked primetime telecast, and FOX&#8217;s &#8220;FEDEX Orange Bowl&#8221; rounded out the top three.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>CSI SPECIAL(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>9,760,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>DEAL OR NO DEAL 1/1(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9,488,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>FEDEX ORANGE BOWL(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>9,319,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>ROSE BOWL-POST GAME(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>8,870,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>ELEVENTH HOUR - SPCL(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>7,740,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>BIG BANG THEORY, THE - SP(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,513,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER-SP(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,271,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>AMER FUNN HM VIDEOS-1/1(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>4,784,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>PRIVATE PRACTICE SP-1/1(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>4,338,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>OFFICE 1/1(S)-01/01/2009</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>4,134,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (January 1, 2009).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall, FOX won the night with an average audience of almost 8.1 million viewers,<br />
while CBS took second place with almost 8 million average viewers. NBC and ABC<br />
claimed third and fourth places with roughly 7.7 million and 4.8 million average viewers,<br />
respectively. UNI and the MNT followed in fifth and sixth places with average<br />
audiences of roughly 3.5 million and 2.3 million average viewers, respectively.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503558478" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-january-1-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-january-1-2009/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Consumer Trends: Looking Back At 2008; Ahead To 2009</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/500303818/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumer-trends-looking-back-at-2008-ahead-to-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[canned food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumer trends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food waste]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[frozen food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[genetic modification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet use]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[key trends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[preductions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[private label]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ramen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[value brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[year in review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nielsen retail industry experts Jonathan Banks, Todd Hale, Tom Pirovano, James Russo, and Jean-Jacques Vandenheede review the key trends that defined the U.S. retail sector in 2008 &#8211; and offer their predictions for the new year.
2008: Staying In Is The New Going Out
Americans are spending more time in front of their computers and televisions. The reach and frequency of TV, Internet, and time ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Nielsen retail industry experts Jonathan Banks, Todd Hale, Tom Pirovano, James Russo, and Jean-Jacques Vandenheede review the key trends that defined the U.S. retail sector in 2008 &#8211; and offer their predictions for the new year.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008-2009.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6598" title="2008-2009" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008-2009-300x211.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="105" /></a>2008: Staying In Is The New Going Out<br />
</strong>Americans are <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/record-high-tv-use-despite-onlinemobile-video-gains/" target="_blank">spending more time</a> in front of their computers and televisions. The reach and frequency of TV, Internet, and time shifted TV use increased notably in 2008, as consumers on tight budgets opted to save money by staying home. </p>
<p><strong>2008: Economizing Strategies Go Digital<br />
</strong>In 2008, 20% of consumer discussions online referenced strategies for managing grocery budgets.  Visits to price comparison websites were also up significatnly this year. </p>
<p><strong>2008: Private Label Reigns Supreme <br />
</strong>As the economy worsened, consumers continued to shift dollar and unit spending to private label products.  The result: private label shares hit all time highs in both units and dollars at year&#8217;s end.  Private label dollar sales averaged about 10% growth in the five four-week periods near the end of the year.  Meanwhile, unit sales growth accelerated, averaging 4% to 5% growth.  In comparison, branded products saw 3% average dollar sales growth and 3% unit sales decline. </p>
<p><strong>2008: Value Trumps Variety, Convenience<br />
</strong>&#8220;Value&#8221; categories and brands saw greater growth in 2008, compared to the previous year:<br />
- Spam: dollar sales up 14% vs. year ago <br />
- Ramen Noodles: dollar sales up 30% vs. year ago<br />
- Dry Pasta: dollar sales up 25% vs. year ago<br />
- Bulk Rice: dollar sales up 38% vs. year ago<br />
- Margarine: dollar sales up 21% vs. year ago<br />
- Canned Vegetables: dollar sales up 9% vs. year ago<br />
- Frozen Vegetables: dollar sales up 7% vs. year ago</p>
<p><span id="more-6595"></span></p>
<p><strong>2009: Retail Stores Close, Consolidate<br />
</strong>&#8220;A rising tide raises all boats&#8221; &#8212; the opposite exposes weaker businesses.  The grocery channel may be &#8220;recession resistant,&#8221; but no channel is &#8220;recession proof.&#8221;  In 2009, expect further consolidation in retail outlet ownership, as flawed businesses go to the wall or are selectively gobbled up at low prices by &#8220;retail winners&#8221; looking to expand their presence in key neighborhoods and markets.</p>
<p><strong>2009: Premium Brands Lose Ground; Genetic Modification Gains New Acceptance<br />
</strong>In 2009, consumers will become more discerning and discriminating, and the premium charged for more expensive lines will be questioned more frequently.  This will retard the growth of some organic and fair trade products, and maybe even increase acceptance of genetically modified products. </p>
<p><strong>2009: Food Waste Reduction Is A New Priority<br />
</strong>With food waste running at 30% in the U.K. and 40% in India, consumers and manufacturers will make greater efforts to reduce avoidable losses in 2009.  Look for growth of the frozen food category, and smaller portions in food service and single-serve ready meals.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/500303818" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumer-trends-looking-back-at-2008-ahead-to-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-consumer-trends-looking-back-at-2008-ahead-to-2009/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Primetime Broadcast Ratings, December 31, 2008</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503532411/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-31-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ABC Wed Movie of Wk-12/31(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bones SP-NY Eve 8P(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bones SP-NY Eve 9P(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Minds Special(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CSI: NY Special(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gary Unmarried Special(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knight Rider 12/31(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law And Order: SVU 12/31(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Rockin Eve '09(S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Old Christine Special (S)-12/31/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[UNI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC&#8217;s &#8220;New Year&#8217;s Rockin Eve &#8216;09 Special&#8221; claimed the top slot in Nielsen&#8217;s ranking of the top primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for Wednesday, December 31, 2008.  The telecast drew just over 8.5 million average viewers on New Years Eve.
CBS&#8217;s &#8220;CSI: NY Special&#8221; and &#8220;Criminal Minds Special&#8221; rounded out the top three, with 6.9 and 6.7 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC&#8217;s &#8220;New Year&#8217;s Rockin Eve &#8216;09 Special&#8221; claimed the top slot in Nielsen&#8217;s ranking of the top primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for Wednesday, December 31, 2008.  The telecast drew just over 8.5 million average viewers on New Years Eve.</p>
<p>CBS&#8217;s &#8220;CSI: NY Special&#8221; and &#8220;Criminal Minds Special&#8221; rounded out the top three, with 6.9 and 6.7 millon average viewers, respectively.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NEW YEAR&#8217;S ROCKIN EVE &#8216;09(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>8,549,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>CSI: NY SPECIAL(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,850,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>CRIMINAL MINDS SPECIAL(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>6,699,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>ABC WED MOVIE OF WK-12/31(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>6,308,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>BONES SP-NY EVE 8P(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>4,671,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>KNIGHT RIDER 12/31(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>4,540,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>BONES SP-NY EVE 9P(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>4,452,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>OLD CHRISTINE SPECIAL(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>4,132,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>LAW AND ORDER:SVU 12/31(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>4,034,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>GARY UNMARRIED SPECIAL(S)-12/31/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>3,893,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (December 31, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall, ABC won the night with an average audience of almost 7.1 million viewers, while CBS took second place with almost 5.9 million average viewers. FOX and NBC claimed third and fourth places with roughly 4.6 million and 4.2 million average viewers, respectively. Univision and the CW followed in fifth and sixth places with average audiences of roughly 3.2 million and 1.2 million average viewers, respectively.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503532411" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-31-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-31-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Comes Of Age: Blackshaw Reflects On Marketing And The Web In 2008</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/499656426/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-comes-of-age-blackshaw-reflects-on-marketing-and-the-web-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online And Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Pete Blackshaw, Nielsen
2008 was a newsworthy &#8212; albeit, topsy-turvy &#8212; year for marketers and researchers. Importantly, social media evolved from experimental sideline to a mainstream attraction. Twitter saw huge growth rates, Barack Obama rewrote the rules of digital marketing, and user-engagement, and &#8220;service is marketing&#8221; Zappos.com re-wrote new rules for building brands and rewiring ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008yearreview.jpg"></a><em>By </em><a href="http://nielsen-online.com/blog/category/pete-blackshaw/" target="_blank"><em>Pete Blackshaw</em></a><em>, Nielsen</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008yearreview1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6452" title="Keyboard -  red key 2008" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008yearreview1-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="112" /></a>2008 was a newsworthy &#8212; albeit, topsy-turvy &#8212; year for marketers and researchers. Importantly, social media evolved from experimental sideline to a mainstream attraction. <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> saw huge growth rates, <a href="http://change.gov">Barack Obama</a> rewrote the rules of digital marketing, and user-engagement, and &#8220;service is marketing&#8221; <a href="http://www.zappos.com">Zappos.com</a> re-wrote new rules for building brands and rewiring e-commerce. <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> trended upward, <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> held steady, and reputation-broker Wikipedia continued marching to the top of Google search results.</p>
<p>Brands like Tide used social media to squeeze extra value out of Super Bowl ads, and Comcast (full disclosure: a Nielsen client) parlayed service scorn into a fundamentally different service/engagement model (still a work in progress).</p>
<p>Fortified by corporate blogs and Twittter handles, dozens of other companies launched &#8220;social media&#8221; teams, while CEOs like Howard Schultz used CGM (e.g. <a href="http://MyStarbucksIdea.com">MyStarbucksIdea.com</a>) as the centerpiece of its turnaround strategy.</p>
<p>Retailers like Wal-Mart turbocharged their web platforms with user-reviews &#8211; many of which ironically challenged &#8220;green claims&#8221; of  featured products, while Facebook introduced &#8220;add water and stir&#8221; fan-sites that were often as inviting to activists as to brand loyalists.</p>
<p>Industry groups like the IAB created social media committees, the ARF put unstructured &#8220;listening&#8221; at the top of the 2008-09 agenda, and for the first time WOMMA managed to nab the likes of IBM, Kraft, Unilever, Intuit, Hershey&#8217;s, and other big fish at its annual conference &#8212; a “coming of age” for word-of-mouth marketing.</p>
<p>On a personal level, I somehow managed to crank out a book that I&#8217;m quite proud of, <a href="http://tell3000.com" target="_blank">&#8220;Satisfied Customers Tell Three Friends, Angry Customers Tell 3000&#8243;</a> (Doubleday), and I certainly hope it continues to inspire constructive conversation on issues and developments similar to the ones I outline below.</p>
<p><span id="more-6352"></span></p>
<p><strong>Marketing Campaigns that Inspired<br />
</strong>- Obama Web Strategy - Empower everybody, nurture advocacy; even small acts can grow into big acts<br />
- <a href="http://www.apple.com/geniusbar"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Apple </span></a><a title="http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar" href="http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar">Genius Bar</a> - Service is the new marketing<br />
- <a href="http://mystarbucksideas.force.com" target="_blank">MyStarbucksIdeas.com</a> - Maybe fans get product development better than the brand.<br />
- <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com" target="_blank">NBCOlympics.com</a> - creating a cross-platform &#8220;ecosystem&#8221;<br />
- New York Times &#8220;Comments&#8221; - Reader engagement creates new source of value<br />
- Zappos Ads in Airport Security Boxes - Hey, if the shoe fits!<br />
- <a href="http://www.contestformoms.com/buzz/im-going-to-the-pg-pampers-mommy-blogger-event/" target="_blank">P&amp;G Mommy Blogger Event</a> - Power Moms matter…as much, perhaps, as traditional media</p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Best Thinking on CGM/Social Media<br />
</strong>- Scott Cook &#8220;User Contribution Systems&#8221; (Harvard Business Review, Fall 2008)<br />
- New York Times - &#8220;<a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html blocked::http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html">Brave New World of Digital Intimacy</a>&#8221; (9/5/2008)<br />
- <a href="http://www.beingpeterkim.com/" target="_blank">Peter Kim</a>&#8217;s Social Media Marketing List<br />
- Business Week cover story, by Jena MacGregor - &#8220;<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_09/b4073038437662.htm" target="_blank">Consumer Vigilantes</a>&#8221; (Spring 2008)</p>
<p><strong>Digital Communities that Raised the Bar<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://community.intuit.com/" href="http://community.intuit.com/">Intuit Community</a><br />
- Dell Computer<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span>- Nike + Social Network<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span>- <a title="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/ownerslounge" href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/ownerslounge">BlackBerry Owners Lounge</a><br />
- <a title="http://community.mtv.com/Content/Discussions/DiscussionResults.aspx?tcid=22921" href="http://community.mtv.com/Content/Discussions/DiscussionResults.aspx?tcid=22921">MTV Community</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.webmd.com/" target="_blank">WebMD</a><br />
- <a title="http://smallbusinessonlinecommunity.bankofamerica.com/index.jspa" href="http://smallbusinessonlinecommunity.bankofamerica.com/index.jspa">Bank of America&#8217;s Small Banking Site</a></p>
<p><strong>Bloggers and Influencers Who Made a Mark in 2008<br />
</strong>- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com">Arriana Huffington</a> &amp; Huffington Post Team<br />
- Forrester&#8217;s <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremy Owyang</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.dooce.com">Dooce.com</a> (Top Mom Blog)<br />
- Gaurav Mishra (Mumbai commentary)<br />
- Xeni Jardin (Boing Boing)<br />
- Pete Cashmore (Mashable)<br />
- B.L. Ochman (Blog + Twitter)<br />
- Twitter Social Media Commentator <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/" target="_blank">Chris Brogan</a><br />
- Comcast&#8217;s <a href="http://twitter.com/comcastcares" target="_blank">Frank Eliason</a> (via Twitter)<br />
- Michael Arlington (<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/" target="_blank">Tech Crunch</a>)<br />
- Ford&#8217;s Scott Monty (<a href="http://twitter.com/scottmonty" target="_blank">via Twitter</a>)<br />
- Power Mom <a href="http://jessicagottlieb.com/" target="_blank">Jessica Gottleib</a><br />
- Steve Rubel (consistently on the mark&#8230;for a very long time)</p>
<p><strong>Viral Videos that Stimulated Our Thinking<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdDqSvJ6aHc" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdDqSvJ6aHc">Tina Fey on SNL</a> - The power of both WOM and cross-platform promotion<br />
- <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY">Yes We Can!</a> (Obama) - Original music + celebrities = viral video<br />
- <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo">Vote Different</a> (Clinton) - What&#8217;s old is new again<br />
- <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq8Uc5BFogE" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq8Uc5BFogE">Wassup 2008</a> - Update of a classic<br />
- <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgtfC5LBAW4" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgtfC5LBAW4">Tide Stain Super Bowl</a> - What happens before and after the game is crucial<br />
- &#8221;<a title="http://www.news3online.com/spread.php blocked::http://www.news3online.com/spread.php" href="http://www.news3online.com/spread.php">You.S.A 2008</a>&#8221; - customized viral videos</p>
<p><strong>Blogs that Inspired<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://www.thecleanestline.com/" href="http://www.thecleanestline.com/">Patagonia Blog</a> -  200% authentic, reflects the cause-driven soul of the company<br />
- <a title="http://www.blogsouthwest.com/" href="http://www.blogsouthwest.com/">Southwest Airlines</a> - Better than free peanuts<br />
- <a title="http://garmin.blogs.com/" href="http://garmin.blogs.com/">Garmin Blog</a> - GPS navigation in action<br />
- <a title="http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/" href="http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/">GM</a> - Unbeatable Google juice<br />
- <a title="http://www.blogs.marriott.com/" href="http://www.blogs.marriott.com/">Marriott&#8217;s CEO Blog</a> - The power of executive personality<br />
- <a title="http://blog.delta.com/" href="http://blog.delta.com/">Delta</a> - Friendlier face to an industry with ‘issues&#8217;</p>
<p><strong>Key Lessons in Defensive Branding<br />
</strong>- Facebook &#8220;Fan&#8221; Sites: Activists also like to &#8220;express&#8221; themselves<br />
- MotrinMoms - Power moms matter, and &#8220;social media&#8221; twitterers are a force to be reckoned with<br />
- All Brands - When times are tight, be careful with &#8220;luxury&#8221; or &#8220;premium&#8221; messaging&#8230;even to the rich<br />
- Whole Foods - The digital trail is difficult to erase when mistakes are made (or changed)<br />
- Kobe Bryant/Nike - If forced to fake it, does it really pay out?</p>
<p><strong>Products that Stole the 2008 Conversation<br />
</strong>- YouTube in your pocket: <a title="http://www.theflip.com/" href="http://www.theflip.com/">Flip Camera</a>, <a title="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=13063&amp;pq-locale=en_US&amp;_requestid=5816" href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=13063&amp;pq-locale=en_US&amp;_requestid=5816">Kodak Zi6</a><br />
- So long keyboard, hello touch!: T-Mobile/Google <a title="http://www.t-mobileg1.com/" href="http://www.t-mobileg1.com/">G1</a>, Blackberry <a title="http://www.blackberry.com/Storm" href="http://www.blackberry.com/Storm">Storm</a>, HP&#8217;s <a title="http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/touchsmart" href="http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/touchsmart">TouchsmartPC</a><br />
- Still shaking things up: <a title="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a>, <a title="http://us.wii.com/" href="http://us.wii.com/">Wii</a></p>
<p><strong>2008&#8217;s Blazing Innovation Trail<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://www.ning.com/" href="http://www.ning.com/">Ning</a> - Create your own social network&#8230;really!<br />
- <a title="http://twitter.grader.com/" href="http://twitter.grader.com/">Twitter Grader</a> - Twitter Grader measures the power of a Twitter profile<br />
- <a title="http://twinfluence.com/ blocked::http://twinfluence.com/" href="http://twinfluence.com/">Twinfluence</a> - Another Twitter influence tool<br />
- <a title="http://search.twitter.com/ blocked::http://search.twitter.com/" href="http://search.twitter.com/">Twitter Search</a> - Search Twitter for content<br />
- <a title="http://www.twemes.com/" href="http://www.twemes.com/">Twemes</a> - Find hashtags for topics<br />
- <a title="http://tweetbeep.com/" href="http://tweetbeep.com/">Tweetbeep</a> - Monitor Twitter by keyword<br />
- <a title="http://friendfeed.com/" href="http://friendfeed.com/">Friendfeed</a> - Discover and discuss interesting stuff that your friends find on the Web<br />
- <a title="http://tagcrowd.com/" href="http://tagcrowd.com/">TagCrowd</a> - Create your own tag cloud from any text to visualize word frequency<br />
- <a title="http://www.zuula.com/Advanced.jsp blocked::http://www.zuula.com/Advanced.jsp" href="http://www.zuula.com/Advanced.jsp">Zuula</a> - A convenient way to get search results from all the top search engines<br />
- <a title="http://www.oneriot.com/ blocked::http://www.oneriot.com/" href="http://www.oneriot.com/">One Riot</a> - A social search engine that finds the pulse of the Web<br />
- <a title="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator blocked::http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator" href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator">Search Engine Site Validation Service</a> - Validate the code on your site for search engines<br />
- <a title="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal blocked::https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" href="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal">Google Keyword Tool</a> - Use Google to find relevant keywords: Keywords = Branding<br />
- <a title="http://www.yammer.com/ blocked::http://www.yammer.com/" href="http://www.yammer.com/">Yammer</a> - Twitter for enterprise<br />
- <a title="http://www.hulu.com/" href="http://www.hulu.com/">Hulu</a> - NBC and News Corp&#8217;s video site<br />
- <a title="http://www.gasbuddy.com/" href="http://www.gasbuddy.com/">GasBuddy</a> - Cheap gas anyone?<br />
- <a title="http://www.pandora.com/" href="http://www.pandora.com/">Pandora</a> - Free music for everyone</p>
<p><strong>Must Read Business Books<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://www.ownershipquotient.com/" href="http://www.ownershipquotient.com/">The Ownership Quotient</a> (HBS Jim Heskett, Earl Sasser)<br />
- <a title="http://www.forrester.com/Groundswell" href="http://www.forrester.com/Groundswell">Groundswell</a> (Li, Bernoff)<br />
- <a title="http://www.radicallytransparent.com/" href="http://www.radicallytransparent.com/">Radically Transparent: Monitoring and Managing Reputations Online</a><br />
- <a title="http://theopenbrand.resource.com/" href="http://theopenbrand.resource.com/">Open Brand</a> (K. Mooney)<br />
- <a title="http://www.marketingtothesocialweb.com/ blocked::http://www.marketingtothesocialweb.com/" href="http://www.marketingtothesocialweb.com/">Marketing to the Social Web</a><br />
- <a title="http://www.digimarketingnow.com/home.html blocked::http://www.digimarketingnow.com/home.html" href="http://www.digimarketingnow.com/home.html">DigiMarketing</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.speedoftrust.com/">Speed of Trust</a> (Stephen Covey)<br />
- <a href="http://www.personalitynotincluded.com/" target="_blank">Personality Not Included</a> (Rohit Bhargava)<br />
- <a title="http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/index.html" href="http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/index.html">Tipping Point</a> (Yes, still relevant)<br />
- <a title="http://www.sethgodin.com/sg/books.asp" href="http://www.sethgodin.com/sg/books.asp">Meatball Sundae</a> (Seth Godin)</p>
<p><strong>Activists &amp; Activist Sites Who Retained (or Grew) Their Bite<br />
</strong>- <a title="http://consumerist.com/" href="http://consumerist.com/">The Consumerist</a><br />
- <a title="http://www.peta.org/" href="http://www.peta.org/">PETA</a><br />
- <a title="http://www.savetheinternet.com/" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/">Save the Internet</a> Coalition<br />
- <a title="http://www.eff.org/" href="http://www.eff.org/">EFF</a><br />
- <a title="http://www.nrdc.org/" href="http://www.nrdc.org/">Natural Resources Defense Council</a><br />
- <a title="http://adage.com/garfield" href="http://adage.com/garfield">The Bobosphere</a></p>
<p><strong>Read Pete Blackshaw&#8217;s predictions for <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/blackshaw-media-marketing-outlook-for-2009/" target="_blank">new media and marketing developments in 2009</a> in the December installment of his regular Ad Age column.</strong></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/499656426" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-comes-of-age-blackshaw-reflects-on-marketing-and-the-web-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-comes-of-age-blackshaw-reflects-on-marketing-and-the-web-in-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Primetime Broadcast Ratings, December 30, 2008</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~3/503509120/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-30-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media And Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[C. Brown(S)-12/30/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cuidado Con El Angel Tue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fuego En La Sangre Tue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Happy New Year]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kenndy Center Honors(S)-12/30/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law And Order 12/30(S)-12/30/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law and Order: SVU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law And Order: SVU 12/30(S)-12/30/2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NCIS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TEL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[UNI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=6649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS&#8217;s &#8220;NCIS&#8221; and &#8220;Kennedy Center Honors&#8221; special were the number one and two-ranked primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for Tuesday, December 30, 2008.
NBC&#8217;s special presentation of &#8221;Law And Order: SVU&#8221; rounded out the top three.



Rank
Program
Network
Viewers (P2+)


1
NCIS
CBS
13,433,000


2
KENNEDY CENTER HONORS(S)-12/30/2008
CBS
10,513,000


3
LAW AND ORDER:SVU 12/30(S)-12/30/2008
NBC
9,624,000


4
LAW AND ORDER:SVU
NBC
8,881,000


5
HAPPY NEW YEAR, C. BROWN(S)-12/30/2008
ABC
6,334,000


6
HOUSE
FOX
5,922,000


7
FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE
UNI
5,407,000


8
LAW AND ORDER 12/30(S)-12/30/2008
NBC
5,259,000


9
CUIDADO CON EL ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS&#8217;s &#8220;NCIS&#8221; and &#8220;Kennedy Center Honors&#8221; special were the number one and two-ranked primetime telecasts on broadcast TV for Tuesday, December 30, 2008.</p>
<p>NBC&#8217;s special presentation of &#8221;Law And Order: SVU&#8221; rounded out the top three.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Program</th>
<th>Network</th>
<th>Viewers (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>NCIS</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>13,433,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>KENNEDY CENTER HONORS(S)-12/30/2008</td>
<td>CBS</td>
<td>10,513,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>LAW AND ORDER:SVU 12/30(S)-12/30/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>9,624,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>LAW AND ORDER:SVU</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>8,881,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>HAPPY NEW YEAR, C. BROWN(S)-12/30/2008</td>
<td>ABC</td>
<td>6,334,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>HOUSE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>5,922,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>FUEGO EN LA SANGRE TUE</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>5,407,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>LAW AND ORDER 12/30(S)-12/30/2008</td>
<td>NBC</td>
<td>5,259,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>CUIDADO CON EL ANGEL TUE</td>
<td>UNI</td>
<td>5,084,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>FRINGE</td>
<td>FOX</td>
<td>5,082,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: The Nielsen Company (December 30, 2008).</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Overall, CBS won the night with an average audience of almost 11.5 million viewers, while NBC took second place with almost 7.9 million average viewers. FOX and ABC claimed third and fourth places with roughly 5.5 million and 4.6 million average viewers. Univision and the Telemundo followed in fifth and sixth places with average audiences of roughly 4.6 million and 1.3 million average viewers, respectively.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NielsenWire/~4/503509120" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-30-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/primetime-broadcast-ratings-december-30-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
