<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Sports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/category/sports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Super Bowl’s Greatest Hits: Top 10 Most Liked Ads of the Past Five Years</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list.  Regardless of category, emotional appeals, humor, non-fatal violence, and animals bolster quality ads and strongly resonate with consumers when executed well.</p>
<p>Of the 144 brands that have advertised during the Super Bowl over the past five years, only a handful of companies have had a presence in every one. From 2007-2011, these seven have earn honorable mentions for being the most resilient Super Bowl advertisers—Budweiser, CareerBuilder, Coca-Cola, Doritos, E*Trade, GoDaddy.com, and the NFL—and five also hold the distinction of being among the ten best liked Super Bowl ads of the past five years.</p>
<div id="playlist"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;">Nielsen’s Top Ten Most Liked Super Bowl Ads, 2007-2011</span>
<div class="yt_holder">
<div id="ytvideo2"></div>
<ul class="demo2">
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pvBvcuSV0w"><span class="number">1</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>NFL</strong></center>Chester Pitts walks  onto the Houston Texans team (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>179</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1hlGlFuWRc"><span class="number">2</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>A horse trains intensively to join the elite Clydesdales (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>176</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEH1omnG77c"><span class="number">3</span><span class="year"><center>2010 &bull; Super Bowl XLIV<br /><strong>Snickers</strong></center>Betty White and Abe  Vigoda are tackled (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>168</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Nmkq60uaQ"><span class="number">4</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super  Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>Clydesdale wants to  play his version of fetch (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>167</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0V6c1rzTsQ"><span class="number">5</span><span class="year"><center>2011 &bull;  Super Bowl XLV<br /><strong>Volkswagen</strong></center>Mini Darth Vader uses  the Force to turn on a car (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>165</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiMf5cCDy1I"><span class="number">6</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Coca-Cola</strong></center>Stewie, Wonder Dog,  and Charlie Brown balloons compete for soda (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>155</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUFvJNQ0bnM"><span class="number">7</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLI<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man faces consequences of snacking while driving (:30) <br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>153</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFsKeDAJPak"><span class="number">8</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Bridgestone</strong></center>Forest animals scream as car nearly hits a squirrel (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>150</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cCli-IPaoU"><span class="number">9</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull;Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>E*Trade</strong></center>Baby says he rented a  clown with his extra money (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>146</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT6YOgbB-gM"><span class="number">10</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man has magical  powers when he crunches his snack chip (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>145</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Only ad executions during Super Bowl airings from 2007-2011 considered.  The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">For example, with a Likeability index of 179 the top ranked NFL ad has proven to be 79 percent better-liked than the average Super Bowl commercial during the past four-week period.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Source: Nielsen</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giants vs Patriots: Playbook for the Social Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30845" title="SuperBowlBuzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz1.gif" alt="SuperBowlBuzz" width="575" height="1008" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png">(click for high resolution image)</a></p>
<h3>Patriots have more online visitors, but Giants fans run up web stats</h3>
<p>During the run up to the playoffs in December 2011, the Patriots had 644,000 unique visitors to their official website, topping the Giants’ 574,000 visitors. However, Giants fans were more engaged when visiting their team’s website, viewing nearly twice as many pages (17 page views per person) compared to Patriots visitors, and spending over 10 minutes each on average.</p>
<h3>Super Bowl buzz: Giants fans cheer more for team, Tom Brady is MVP of social media</h3>
<p>Fans’ excitement throughout the playoffs carried over to social media. The Giants had more buzz about their team each week, with a 59 percent share of buzz compared to the Patriots’ 41 percent of buzz volume on blogs, message boards/forums, public posts on Twitter and Facebook and online news posts.  But Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady surpassed Giants QB Eli Manning, with nearly double the amount of buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year in Sports Advertising: TV Ad Spend Grows to $10.9B</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National TV sports advertising generated $10.9 billion in revenue last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National TV sports generated $10.9 billion in advertising expenditure last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>. Measuring ad spend during sporting events on network and cable TV from Q4 2010 through Q3 2011, Nielsen also saw that cable has an increasing share of those ad dollars—growing 37.3 percent year over year compared to 5.9 percent for sports ad spending in general.</p>
<p>TV sports advertising is dominated by a few big spenders, with the top 10 — led by AT&amp;T, Bud Light, Verizon Wireless, McDonald’s and DIRECTV—accounting for roughly a quarter (26%) of the total spend during that time period.</p>
<p>The increase in TV ad spend mirrors a similar increase in the amount of live TV sports content available on TV and cable. There were more than 42,500 hours of live sporting events on national broadcast and cable TV in 2011, a five percent increase over 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30730  aligncenter" title="year-in-sports-ads" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png" alt="year-in-sports-ads" width="500" height="824" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>For more insights on sports and media, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baseball&#8217;s Diamonds: Which Major League Teams Dominated Local TV Ratings?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/baseball%e2%80%99s-diamonds-which-major-league-teams-dominated-local-tv-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/baseball%e2%80%99s-diamonds-which-major-league-teams-dominated-local-tv-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals might be headed to the World Series, but the Philadelphia Phillies garnered the top local TV ratings in 2011. This season, nearly one-tenth of Philadelphia households—the most of any market—tuned in during regular season, locally televised Phillies games, and more than double (21.6%) of those households tuned in during the playoffs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Texas Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals might be headed to the World Series, but the Philadelphia Phillies garnered the top local TV ratings in 2011. This season, nearly one-tenth of Philadelphia households—the most of any market—tuned in during regular season, locally televised Phillies games, and more than double (21.6%) of those households tuned in during the playoffs. Interestingly, half of the playoff teams were among the top 10 for household ratings for regular season, locally televised games and all three top teams made the playoffs.</p>
<p>The Cardinals and Milwaukee Brewers took the second and third spots for cheering on their home teams—from the comfort of their couches. During the regular season 8.9 percent and 7.9 percent of households tuned in, respectively, and they continued to see strong viewership numbers during the playoffs as well. During the playoffs, the Cardinals garnered the highest household rating of any market (26.2%), while the Brewers held onto the third spot.</p>
<p>“The Phillies’ high-profile acquisition of pitching ace Cliff Lee last winter built incredible team buzz and the fans definitely tuned in,” said Stephen Master, VP of Sports, Nielsen.</p>
<p>Just as they did on the field, some teams did better on television this year vs. last year. During the regular season, the Milwaukee Brewers jumped to the third spot after a 63 percent yearly increase in local ratings. The Cleveland Indians saw a whopping 105 percent increase in their local market rating compared to last year, bringing them to the eighth spot in the overall rankings.</p>
<p>In terms of sheer volume of households tuning in, however, no one can beat the New York Yankees. The Yankees had roughly 323,000 local New York City households tune in to their 2011 regular season games and an astounding 918,000 households tune in to their playoff games.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Major League Baseball Local Ratings</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Team</th>
<th> Household<br />
Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philadelphia Phillies</td>
<td>9.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>St. Louis Cardinals</td>
<td>8.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee Brewers</td>
<td>7.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boston Red Sox</td>
<td>7.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cincinnati Reds</td>
<td>7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Detroit Tigers</td>
<td>6.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minnesota Twins</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cleveland Indians</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pittsburgh Pirates</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New York Yankees</td>
<td>4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: Nielsen<br />
The Household Rating represents the percentage of all<br />
TV homes in that local market that tuned in to the games.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>With the World Series starting tonight, Rangers fans will face steep competition against the enthusiastic Cardinals fans.  In this year’s playoff games, roughly 26 percent of St. Louis households tuned into the games, while in Dallas, only about 17 percent of households tuned into the locally televised Rangers games.</p>
<p>“Although the AL Rangers are favored to win their first World Series in franchise history, fan loyalty has definitely been stronger in the NL this season. Combining the local ratings for the regular season and the first two rounds of the playoffs, Philadelphia, St. Louis and Milwaukee rank as the top three markets for tuning in to watch and support their local team.”</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"> Major League Baseball Local Ratings</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Team</th>
<th> Household Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>St. Louis Cardinals</td>
<td>26.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Detroit Tigers</td>
<td>23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Milwaukee Brewers</td>
<td>22.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Philadelphia Phillies</td>
<td>21.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Rangers</td>
<td>17.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tampa Bay Rays</td>
<td>12.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New York Yankees</td>
<td>12.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Arizona Diamondbacks</td>
<td>10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: Nielsen<br />
The Household Rating represents the percentage of all<br />
TV homes in that local market that tuned in to the games.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/baseball%e2%80%99s-diamonds-which-major-league-teams-dominated-local-tv-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts Discuss Sports &amp; Mobile: The Perfect Marriage</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/experts-discuss-sports-mobile-the-perfect-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/experts-discuss-sports-mobile-the-perfect-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For sports fans, mobile means instant score updates, fantasy sports at your fingertips and connecting with your favorite teams and athletes via social media, all without leaving the stadium, the train or your favorite armchair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Stephen Master, VP, Sports, Nielsen</em></strong></p>
<p>On October 4, at Advertising Week, Nielsen hosted a panel discussion on “How Mobile is Changing Sports Media &amp; Marketing.” One panelist dubbed the mobile phone the “first screen” because it’s always on and—more importantly—it’s always with you. For sports fans, that means instant score updates, fantasy sports at your fingertips and connecting with your favorite teams and athletes via social media, all without leaving the stadium, the train or your favorite armchair.</p>
<p>Jonathan Carson, Nielsen’s CEO of Digital moderated the discussion. Below are some highlights from the panel.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson:</em> <em>We’ve said that mobile is the perfect platform for sports and sports apps are perfect for mobile. Can you elaborate on that?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>David Coletti, VP, Digital Media Research &amp; Analytics, ESPN: </strong>The perfect marriage is between mobile and sports. We see data that backs that up… The past two NFL Sundays, we had 10 million people use our mobile sites and 13 million using espn.com. In September, usage of ESPN’s mobile sites and applications represented 4.5 billion minutes of usage. All of that shows the power of the platform… and the market is far from saturated.</p>
<p><strong>Clark Pierce, SVP, Digital Content, Fox Sports: </strong>We did research earlier this year that showed people go to their devices at least 100 times per day.</p>
<p><strong>Doug Smoyer, VP, Business Development, New York Giants: </strong></p>
<p>Super Bowl XLII was four years ago but “eons ago” in terms of mobile. After the Eagles game two weeks ago, the Giants shared a picture of the team in the locker room following the win. In just two hours, the picture received more than 40,000 “likes” on Facebook. It was incredible.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson:</em> <em>What is it about mobile that changes the game?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Rob Master, VP, Media, Unilever: </strong>We are rethinking the model of the best available screen. Interaction goes well beyond that biggest screen… figuring out the best content, best message, best place.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson:</em> <em>How does simultaneous usage, particularly for sports, impact your businesses?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>David Coletti, ESPN: </strong>We launched ESPN XP to measure ad effectiveness across platforms. When you look at the different objectives that an ad campaign might have… each media pulls different levers. It’s about how we best mix your media. Creative in context is vitally important.</p>
<p><strong>Rob Master, Unilever: </strong>Unilever has been marketing more to men thanks to the launch of several men’s lines, including Vaseline Men, Dove Men+Care and Axe (“helping guys in the mating game”).  Men and sports are a nice combination, marriage… We follow where our consumer goes. For sports, if we do it right with the right content, we win.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson: How does mobile change your approach to sports marketing?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Mark Rooks, Sr. Director, Sports Marketing, Pepsi</strong></p>
<p>We are always looking for new ways to engage consumers. Pepsi recently partnered with IntoNow. Around the launch of our MLB Field of Dreams ad, we asked consumers to use their mobile device to identify our ad, consumers were then sent cool interactive content and value offers. Mobile and social are also affecting how brands look at celebrity sponsorships. We now always look at a celebrity’s social activity and following. A second- or third-tier athlete who is incredibly active online can be a very efficient choice.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson:</em> <em>Are you facing any particular challenges in the mobile space?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Doug Smoyer, New York Giants: </strong>Not every marketer is built or equipped the same… People don’t know what they want. They just know they want it.</p>
<p>The conversation might not always be what you want it to be. The Giants partnered with Walgreens for a flu shot campaign. After a loss, they received some negative comments during the campaign. If the team’s not performing well, you need to expect that.</p>
<p><strong><em>Jonathan Carson:</em> <em>What’s coming up?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Rob Master, Unilever: </strong>How do we deliver more specific and relevant content by screen?</p>
<p><strong>David Coletti, ESPN: </strong>It’s critically important that we have the power to measure… It unlocks more spending.</p>
<p><strong>Clark Pierce, Fox Sports: </strong>We plan to work more with Facebook and Twitter. Also, the development of the HTML 5 platform will be interesting, specifically the security of video.  This can create competition. Does a content provider develop an App and an HTML5 site or both?</p>
<p><strong>Mark Rooks</strong><strong>, Pepsi: </strong>Continued penetration growth and scale as well as contextual opportunities.  Being able to deliver our content the right way at the right time and location.  So for example, being able to recognize a fan in a stadium and reward them real time with experiences, content or product offers.</p>
<p><strong>Doug Smoyer, New York Giants: </strong>The key is how we activate. For 2012, the goal it to find the right brand to go and activate a Foursquare partnership … a retail partner in the city of New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/experts-discuss-sports-mobile-the-perfect-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Audience Watches Opening Rugby World Cup Match</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unprecedented 81% of the population (15 years and older) were glued to screens across New Zealand to watch the opening game of the Rugby World Cup, according to the results of a survey conducted by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUCKLAND, New Zealand – An unprecedented 81% of the population (15 years and older) were glued to screens across New Zealand to watch the opening game of the Rugby World Cup, according to the results of a survey conducted by Nielsen.</p>
<p>&#8220;New Zealanders take their Rugby very seriously as can be seen by an unprecedented audience of viewers who watched at home, at a friend’s home, in a pub or at one of the many outdoor venues set up for the tournament. To establish live viewing of the game both in-home and out-of-home and for the opening ceremony, Nielsen conducted a special survey of all individuals (15+) in their 500-home Television Audience Measurement panel,&#8221; said Claire Harris, Managing Director of Nielsen Television Audience Measurement in New   Zealand.</p>
<p>The Rugby World Cup is the third biggest international sporting event after the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup. 80 nations compete in qualifiers over 3 years for 20 spots in the final competition. The match between the 2011 Host nation’s team, the New Zealand All Blacks, and the Pacific Island nation of Tonga, was the first of 48 matches to be played and televised over the ensuing six weeks. The 2011 qualifying teams also include Australia, England, France, Italy, South Africa, United States, Wales, Scotland and Ireland, who are all competing for the holy grail of International Rugby, the Webb Ellis Cup.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was a perfect day for the Opening Ceremony and inaugural match of the tournament, and there were numerous outdoor venues to watch the game with crowds exceeding all expectations.</p>
<p>&#8220;The massive audience for the opening game illustrates the power of television in making such a wonderful event accessible to sports fans right across the country,&#8221; Harris added.</p>
<p>The study also showed that people viewing out-of-home were more likely to be male, younger and from Auckland.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Rugby_NZ.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-29201  aligncenter" title="New Zealand Rugby World Cup Viewership" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Rugby_NZ.png" alt="New Zealand Rugby World Cup Viewership" width="516" height="402" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/record-audience-watches-opening-rugby-world-cup-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buzz and Marketability: Scoring the NFL&#8217;s Top Quarterbacks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Donovan McNabb hold the highest N-Scores, a measure of marketability created in tandem with E-Poll, yet Michael Vick, Tom Brady, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers garnered the most buzz online since last September. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good quarterback does more than just run the offense and lead the team, he brings some caché—both to marketers and to fans.  Among NFL QBs, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Donovan McNabb hold the highest N-Scores, Nielsen&#8217;s measure of marketability created in tandem with E-Poll. However, Michael Vick, Tom Brady, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers garnered the most buzz online since last September. Michael Vick was the hands down most buzzed about, with 16.3 percent of all quarterback buzz.</p>
<p>And an oft-discussed quarterback can lead (or follow) his team to buzz dominance as well. Half of the top 10 quarterbacks by N-Score were on the top 10 teams with the most buzz; however, there are a number of players and teams where no connection appears. Tony Romo garnered slightly higher than the median quarterback buzz (1.8%) while the Dallas Cowboys were one of the most buzzed about teams with 5.8 percent of all online buzz mentions. Incidentally, the Cowboys also had the most unique visitors to their website on average.</p>
<p>High awareness of a player—as captured through the N-Score—can also be indicative of a player’s buzz. For players like the Eagles’ Michael Vick and the Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger, their awareness and buzz are both high—yet their N-Score, which takes into account traits such as likeability, down-to-earth and talented—reflects negative public reaction to their activity off the field (13 and 16, respectively). Besides Matt Hasselbeck, all of the top 10 quarterbacks by N-Score received high online buzz.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="6">Top 10 NFL Quarterbacks by National N-score</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Player</th>
<th>2010 Team<br />
(2011 Team)</th>
<th>National N-Score</th>
<th>Awareness</th>
<th>Share of QB Buzz</th>
<th>Team Buzz</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peyton Manning</td>
<td>Indianapolis Colts</td>
<td>262</td>
<td>49%</td>
<td>5.8%</td>
<td>3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Drew Brees</td>
<td>New Orleans Saints</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>2.7</td>
<td>4.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Donovan McNabb</td>
<td>Washington Redskins<br />
(Minnesota Vikings)</td>
<td>153</td>
<td>29</td>
<td>2.3</td>
<td>2.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tom Brady</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>131</td>
<td>35</td>
<td>4.8</td>
<td>4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aaron Rodgers</td>
<td>Green Bay Packers</td>
<td>119</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brett Farve</td>
<td>Minnestoa Vikings (Retired)</td>
<td>108</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>5.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eli Manning</td>
<td>New York Giants</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>1.8</td>
<td>6.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tim Tebow</td>
<td>Denver Broncos</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>3.6</td>
<td>2.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Ryan</td>
<td>Atlanta Falcons</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Hasselbeck*</td>
<td>Seattle Seahawks (Tennessee Titans)</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1</td>
<td>1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sam Bradford*</td>
<td>St. Louis Rams</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>1.6</td>
<td>1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">Read as: Peyton Manning had a National N-score of 262, and accounted for 5.8% of all buzz about NFL Quarterbacks during the 2010 season through the August 2011.<br />
Note: Team Buzz describes online buzz about each player&#8217;s 2010 season team.<br />
Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Players with lesser awareness can also become buzz generators online. Alex Smith and Mark Sanchez, who were nationally known by just four and 16 percent of the population, respectively, had a tremendous amount of player buzz—higher than three percent of all quarterback buzz. Sanchez may benefit from his association with the Jets, the NFL’s most buzzed about team.</p>
<p>“Buzz for the NFL has ramped up this summer as the lockout-shortened off season created a flurry of trades and free agent signings that gave fans plenty to talk about.  We’re closely watching to see how all of this excitement in August translates to TV ratings in September. Roughly 18 million Americans tuned in to nationally broadcast NFL games, on average, during the 2010-2011 season,” said Stephen Master, Vice President, Sports for Nielsen.</p>
<p>Masters continued, “It will be interesting to see how fans respond to controversial players, such as Michael Vick, this season. His strong performance on the field was rewarded with a $100 million contract, but he’s still a polarizing figure nationally with a higher than average number of Americans expressing dislike for him, according to the N-Score.”</p>
<div class="table_meta"><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Using the combined research expertise of Nielsen and E-Poll Market  Research, N-Score is an in-depth look at a sports figure’s overall  endorsement potential, factoring in the attributes and demographic  measures that align brands with endorsers.  Each individual N-Score  National survey is administered to 1,100 people within that panel via  the Internet. The sample is representative of the general population  based on gender, income, age, and education. Awareness, as noted in the Wire post above, is determined by showing half of the survey participants a picture of the athlete and half the athlete’s name.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/buzz-and-marketability-scoring-the-nfls-top-quarterbacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Fans Generate Online Buzz in Run-up to the Football Season</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media buzz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As NFL fans gear up for the season ahead and prepare the rosters for their fantasy football teams, they head online for news and buzz about their favorite teams and players.</p>
<p>Among NFL teams, the NY Jets generated the most online buzz during the off-season from blogs, message boards/groups, Twitter, Facebook, and online news posts. &#8220;America&#8217;s Team,&#8221; the Dallas Cowboys continue to generate national interest in online discussions, although they were topped by their rivals, the Philadelphia Eagles, who led NFC teams and were second in overall pre-season buzz. The NY Giants, and their regional rival, the New England Patriots, round out the top five teams with the most pre-season buzz.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Pre-season buzz about NFL Teams</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>NFL Team</th>
<th>Share of Total NFL Team Buzz</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>New York Jets</td>
<td>11.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Philadelphia Eagles</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>New York Giants</td>
<td>6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Dallas Cowboys</td>
<td>5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>New England Patriots</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: The NY Jets had the most buzz among all NFL teams during the pre-season.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 31 &#8211; August 6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>An abbreviated off-season due to the NFL lockout sparked a flurry of free-agent signings and trades of popular players, and generated considerable online buzz among sports fans.  Looking at players who have changed teams ahead of the 2011 season, Reggie Bush received the most buzz during the off-season with 194k mentions. Comparing buzz about NFL players who joined new teams through free-agency or trade in recent weeks, Plaxico Burress led this group of players with more than 13k mentions during the week of July 31 – August 6, followed by Reggie Bush, Nnamdi Asomugha, Chad Ochocinco, and Donovan McNabb.</p>
<p>One in four active web users in the US visited sites in the Sports category, which amounts to 42.5 million Americans during the most recent week (ending July 31).  Compared to weeks during the off-season, the NFL’s network of sites more than doubled their audience, a 258 percent increase in unique US visitors during the first full week after the NFL lockout ended.</p>
<table class="chart">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3">Top Sports Sites During Week of July 31</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Website</th>
<th>Unique Audience (000)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Yahoo! Sports</td>
<td>14,859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>9,515</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>FOXSports.com on MSN</td>
<td>7,419</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>NFL Internet Network</td>
<td>4,923</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>MLB.com</td>
<td>4,906</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Read as: Yahoo! Sports had 14.9 million unique US visitors during the week ending July 31, about 8.9% of active web users during the week from Home/Work PCs and laptop computers.<br />
Source: Nielsen, July 25 &#8211; July 31, 2011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As US sports fans go online for the latest news and stats, Yahoo&#8217;s network of sports sites was their top destination during the week of July 31. ESPN.com and FoxSports.com websites were also popular destinations for US sports fans in this most recent week. Historically the months of August and September are the busiest for sports sites, so this may provide another preview of the season to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/nfl-fans-generate-online-buzz-in-run-up-to-the-football-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s World Cup Final Draws 13.5 Million Viewers in US</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/womens-world-cup-final-draws-13-5-million-viewers-in-us/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/womens-world-cup-final-draws-13-5-million-viewers-in-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roughly 13.5 million people in the U.S. tuned in to watch Japan’s shoot-out victory over USA in the final of the Women’s World Cup on Sunday, July 17, the end of a tumultuous and exciting tournament that left USA fans on the edge of their seats. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roughly 13.5 million people in the U.S. tuned in to watch Japan’s shoot-out victory over USA in the final of the Women’s World Cup on Sunday, July 17, the end of a tumultuous and exciting tournament that left USA fans on the edge of their seats. The final game drew about 9.6 million more U.S. viewers than the quarterfinal game between U.S. and Brazil on Sunday, July 10, a 246 percent increase.</p>
<p>Excitement about the game was also shared online where 1.1 percent of all buzz was about the World Cup and its players, making it an event of historical significance on Twitter and around the blogosphere.  Twitter represented a majority of World Cup buzz, and tweets on game day outnumbered those the entire week prior. During the tournament, Hope Solo generated the most buzz of the USA players on blogs and Twitter while Abby Wambach had the most news coverage in the run up to the big game, but Alex Morgan’s star performance in the finals helped her become the most buzzed about player on Twitter. Overall, Alex Morgan was the most buzzed about US player during the game with 18.1 percent of all World Cup buzz on July 17, followed by Hope Solo (8.7%) and Abby Wambach (2.8%).</p>
<p>“This year’s World Cup brought stellar athletes like Hope Solo, Abby Wambach and team youngster Alex Morgan onto the global stage,” said Stephen Master, VP Nielsen Sports. “Their standout performances and perseverance throughout the tournament is certain to raise the profile of women’s soccer as they resonate with fans and potential sponsors.” </p>
<p>While women accounted for a larger share of the World Cup’s audience as the tournament progressed, the makeup of the audience for the Women’s World Cup was in line with sporting events featuring male athletes, such as the Stanley Cup or NBA Finals.  For almost all recent major sporting events, male viewers have outnumbered female viewers two to one, representing about two thirds of the total audience.  The one outlier is the Super Bowl, which attracts a more evenly distributed male and female audience.  </p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> Viewership of Recent Sports Broadcasts*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Game</th>
<th> Total Viewers AA (000)</th>
<th> % of  Female Viewers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Final (7/17/11) – USA and Japan</td>
<td>13,458</td>
<td>38.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Semifinal (7/13/11) – USA and France</td>
<td>3,354</td>
<td>33.10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Quarterfinal (7/10/11) – USA and Brazil</td>
<td>3,890</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Super Bowl XLVI</td>
<td>111,041</td>
<td>45.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NHL Stanley Cup 2011</td>
<td>3,905</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">NBA Finals</td>
<td>17,340</td>
<td>36.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Daytona 500</td>
<td>15,597</td>
<td>35.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
*All data based on live+same day data</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/womens-world-cup-final-draws-13-5-million-viewers-in-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast Break: Dirk Nowitzki Now NBA&#8217;s Most Marketable Player</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fast-break-dirk-nowitzki-now-nbas-most-marketable-player/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fast-break-dirk-nowitzki-now-nbas-most-marketable-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk Nowitski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBA finals champ Dirk Nowitzki is the most marketable man in basketball, according to Nielsen/E-Poll, with an N-Score of 132. In addition to his MVP performance in the finals, Nowitzki’s new top position on the list is thanks in part to the retirement of N-Score and endorsement heavyweight Shaquille O’Neal and the shifting fortunes of LeBron James and Dwyane Wade, whose scores dropped from 131 to 26 and 117 to 34, respectively.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBA finals champ Dirk Nowitzki is the most marketable man in basketball, according to Nielsen/E-Poll, with an N-Score of 132. In addition to his MVP performance in the finals, Nowitzki’s new top position on the list is thanks in part to the retirement of N-Score and endorsement heavyweight Shaquille O’Neal and the shifting fortunes of LeBron James and Dwyane Wade, whose scores dropped from 131 to 26 and 117 to 34, respectively.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nba-n-score.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28427" title="nba-n-score" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/nba-n-score.png" alt="nba-n-score" width="489" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>The N-Score measures name and image awareness, appeal and personality attributes such as sincerity, approachability, experience and influence, both at the U.S. national and local levels. “The extreme N-Score declines of LeBron and Dwyane Wade demonstrate that endorsement potential is about much more than consumer awareness,” said Stephen Master, VP, Nielsen Sports.  “From endorsement superstars to being knocked off the top 10 list, they’ve learned the hard way the importance of public perception and appeal.”</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"> Top 10 Most Marketable NBA Players</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Player</th>
<th> Team</th>
<th> Current N-Score</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Dirk Nowitzki</td>
<td>Dallas Mavericks</td>
<td>132</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Kobe Bryant</td>
<td>Los Angeles Lakers</td>
<td>83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Steve Nash</td>
<td>Phoenix Suns</td>
<td>68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Kevin Garnett</td>
<td>Boston Celtics</td>
<td>65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tim Duncan</td>
<td>San Antonio Spurs</td>
<td>51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Jason Kidd</td>
<td>Dallas Mavericks</td>
<td>47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Grant Hill</td>
<td>Phoenix Suns</td>
<td>41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Derrick Rose</td>
<td>Chicago Bulls</td>
<td>41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Pau Gasol</td>
<td>Los Angeles Lakers</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Vince Carter</td>
<td>Phoenix Suns</td>
<td>38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen / E-Poll N-Score</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong><br />
Using the combined research expertise of Nielsen and E-Poll Market Research, N-Score is an in-depth look at a sports figure’s overall endorsement potential, factoring in the attributes and demographic measures that align brands with endorsers.  Each individual N-Score National survey is administered to 1,100 people within that panel via the Internet. The sample is representative of the general population based on gender, income, age, and education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/fast-break-dirk-nowitzki-now-nbas-most-marketable-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

