<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>31 Million in U.S. Watch President Obama&#8217;s Jobs Speech on Television</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/31-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-jobs-speech-on-television/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/31-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-jobs-speech-on-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=29060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, September 8, 2011, President Obama addressed a joint session of Congress with his agenda for creating jobs in the U.S. The speech was carried live from approximately 7:00PM-8:00PM EDT on 11 networks. The sum of the average audience for those networks was 31,439,080 viewers, with a combined household rating of 20.9.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, September 8, 2011, President Obama addressed a joint session of Congress with his agenda for creating jobs in the U.S. The <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2011/09/08/president-obama-presents-american-jobs-act-enhanced-version">speech</a> was carried live from approximately 7:00PM-8:00PM EDT on 11 networks. The sum of the average audience for those networks was 31,439,080 viewers, with a combined household rating of 20.9. The following networks carried the address: ABC, AZA, CBS, NBC, TEL, UNI, CNBC, CNN, FBN, FOXNC, and MSNBC.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/obama-speeches-jobs.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-29062" title="obama-speeches-jobs" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/obama-speeches-jobs.png" alt="obama-speeches-jobs" width="575" height="433" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/31-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-jobs-speech-on-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>26 Million in U.S. Watch President Obama&#8217;s Address on Libya</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/26-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-address-on-libya/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/26-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-address-on-libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=26995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, March 28, 2011, President Obama delivered an address on the status of the American involvement in Libya. The address was carried live from approximately 7:30 PM- 8:00 PM on 8 networks. The sum of the average audience for those networks was 25,636,310 viewers, with a combined household rating of 16.9. The networks carrying the address included ABC, CBS, NBC, TEL, CNN, CNBC, FOXNC, and MSNBC.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, March 28, 2011, President Obama delivered an address on the status of the American involvement in Libya. The address was carried live from approximately 7:30 PM- 8:00 PM on 8 networks. The sum of the average audience for those networks was 25,636,310 viewers, with a combined household rating of 16.9. The networks carrying the address included ABC, CBS, NBC, TEL, CNN, CNBC, FOXNC, and MSNBC.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/obama-libya-address.png"><img src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/obama-libya-address.png" alt="obama-libya-address" title="obama-libya-address" width="512" height="320" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-27007" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/26-million-in-u-s-watch-president-obamas-address-on-libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the Busiest Month for Political TV Ads, Cleveland Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot tv ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, American TV viewers were exposed to almost 1.48 million political ads, up from the 1.41 million political ads aired in October 2008 (the last major presidential election year), according to data released today by Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in a midterm election cycle, American TV viewers were inundated with more TV ads than perhaps ever before.</p>
<p>Last month, American TV viewers were exposed to almost 1.48 million  political ads, up from the 1.41 million political ads aired in October  2008 (the last major presidential election year), according to data released today by Nielsen. It was the largest political ad output on record in what is traditionally known as the busiest month of the year for political messaging. Nielsen data over the last five calendar years suggest that TV distributors air twice as many political and issue ads in October than any other month, on average.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/political-ads-average.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24493" title="political-ads-average" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/political-ads-average.png" alt="political-ads-average" width="564" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>For some media markets, political ads are especially dominant in the local TV landscape, and nowhere is this more evident than Ohio.  In an analysis of local broadcast TV outlets in the top 128 U.S. markets in October, Cleveland stations aired the highest proportion of political and issue advertising.  Nielsen found that about one out of every four paid TV ads aired on local Cleveland stations was placed by a political candidate or outside political group. Ohio&#8217;s capital city Columbus placed a very close second in the ranking with an estimated 23.37% of paid ads bought by political entities. Portland, OR, Sacramento, CA, and Seattle, WA round out the top 5.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> HIGHEST SATURATION OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING, BY MARKET<br />
10/1 to 10/31/10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> MARKET</th>
<th> # OF POLITICAL ADS*</th>
<th> TOTAL # OF ADS**</th>
<th> POLITICAL AD %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Cleveland, OH</td>
<td>29,689</td>
<td>126,656</td>
<td>23.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Columbus, OH</td>
<td>24,693</td>
<td>105,651</td>
<td>23.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Portland, OR</td>
<td>25,527</td>
<td>117,208</td>
<td>21.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Sacramento, CA</td>
<td>26,965</td>
<td>127,318</td>
<td>21.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Seattle, WA</td>
<td>26,071</td>
<td>133,874</td>
<td>19.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Champaign-Springfield, IL</td>
<td>14,662</td>
<td>77,264</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Reno, NV</td>
<td>18,364</td>
<td>98,414</td>
<td>18.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Denver, CO</td>
<td>24,302</td>
<td>130,255</td>
<td>18.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Orlando, FL</td>
<td>22,517</td>
<td>122,417</td>
<td>18.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>West Palm Beach, FL</td>
<td>18,546</td>
<td>101,126</td>
<td>18.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
* &#8211; Includes all TV ads placed on local broadcast TV outlets within the  given market by groups characterized as political and professional  organizations<br />
** &#8211; Includes all national and local paid ads aired on TV stations monitored by Nielsen in the given market; excludes promos and PSAs<br />
Note: results may be impacted by the number of broadcast viewing sources captured by Nielsen in  each local market.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Ohio&#8217;s status as a political TV battleground is nothing new.  In 2008, six Ohio DMAs placed among the top 20 markets with the highest rate of political ads in October, and in the last midterm election in 2006, five markets from the Buckeye State placed in the top 20.</p>
<p>Of course, not all U.S. TV markets were as politically saturated. Ohioans seeking a respite from this year&#8217;s political noise may have wanted to lay low in Jackson, MS, where only one percent of paid TV ads airing on local stations were classified as political or issue ads. The Richmond, VA market had the second lowest rate of political saturation among the 128 markets analyzed in October at just 2.45%.  Richmond&#8217;s ranking comes in stark contrast to the same time last year, when it ranked fourth nationally in political TV saturation, thanks to <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/campaign-ad-races-heat-up-in-va-nj-and-ny-contests/">a high-profile governor&#8217;s race</a> in an otherwise off year for political campaigns.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Texas offered four of the ten least saturated markets last month.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> LOWEST SATURATION OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING, BY MARKET<br />
10/1 to 10/31/10</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> MARKET</th>
<th> # OF POLITICAL ADS*</th>
<th> TOTAL # OF ADS**</th>
<th> POLITICAL AD %</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>Jackson, MS</td>
<td>827</td>
<td>81,218</td>
<td>1.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>Richmond-Petersburg, VA</td>
<td>2,466</td>
<td>100,774</td>
<td>2.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Lincoln-Hastings-Kearney, NE</td>
<td>2,036</td>
<td>72,851</td>
<td>2.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>Salt Lake City, UT</td>
<td>3,321</td>
<td>112,984</td>
<td>2.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Tyler-Longview, TX</td>
<td>1,876</td>
<td>52,141</td>
<td>3.60%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>Chattanooga, TN</td>
<td>3,370</td>
<td>91,703</td>
<td>3.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Knoxville, TN</td>
<td>3,916</td>
<td>100,463</td>
<td>3.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>Harlingen-Brownsville, TX</td>
<td>4,407</td>
<td>109,719</td>
<td>4.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX</td>
<td>7,596</td>
<td>188,308</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">10</td>
<td>Houston, TX</td>
<td>6,602</td>
<td>159,868</td>
<td>4.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company<br />
* &#8211; Includes all TV ads placed on local broadcast TV outlets within the given market by groups characterized as political and professional organizations<br />
** &#8211; Includes all national and local paid ads aired on TV stations  monitored by Nielsen in the given market; excludes promos and PSAs<br />
Note: results may be impacted by the number of broadcast viewing sources captured by Nielsen in  each local market.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Download the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/NielsenWire-Political_Ads_by_Market_100110_103110.xls">full rankings</a> of all 128 markets contained in Nielsen&#8217;s October political advertising analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/in-the-busiest-month-for-political-tv-ads-cleveland-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Term Viewership Up as 35 Million Watch U.S. Election Coverage</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mid-term-viewership-up-as-35-million-watch-u-s-election-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mid-term-viewership-up-as-35-million-watch-u-s-election-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, November 2, 2010 broadcast and cable networks provided coverage of the 2010 mid-term elections. The figure below represents the combined average audience estimate from 9:00pm-11:00pm. The networks include ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, UNI, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, November 2, 2010 broadcast and cable networks provided coverage of the 2010 mid-term elections. The figure below represents the combined average audience estimate from 9:00pm-11:00pm. The networks include ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, UNI, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"> MID-TERM ELECTION VIEWERSHIP</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> YEAR</th>
<th> STATIONS</th>
<th> VIEWERS (P2+)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2010</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, UNI, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC</td>
<td>34,911,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2006</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC</td>
<td>31,398,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2002</td>
<td>ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC</td>
<td>26,297,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="3">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/mid-term-viewership-up-as-35-million-watch-u-s-election-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Scorecard: Campaign Gaffe Gives Jerry Brown Unwanted Attention</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-campaign-gaffe-gives-jerry-brown-unwanted-attention/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-campaign-gaffe-gives-jerry-brown-unwanted-attention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Ehrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign media analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Scott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unflattering and off-script take on his gubernatorial opponent helped drive Jerry Brown's overall on-air and online exposure last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/08/local/la-me-jerry-brown-20101007">unflattering and off-script take on his gubernatorial opponent</a> helped drive Jerry Brown&#8217;s overall on-air and online exposure last week, according to the newest midterm campaign media analysis by The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>The analysis shows that the campaign voicemail gaffe helped to push Brown&#8217;s name past Republican Meg Whitman&#8217;s in both national online buzz  and in on-air television mentions in California&#8217;s top media markets. It had been at least 10 days since Brown led his opponent in either category, but the negative exposure was certainly not the way the campaign would have liked to take the lead.</p>
<p>The drama occurred during a week where both campaigns significantly stepped up their overall ad buys. Whitman aired  3,727 ads across California&#8217;s top four media markets last week, 51 percent more than her total during the previous week. Brown, meanwhile, aired 2,804 ads in the same markets, a 60 percent increase over the previous week.</p>
<p>In other campaigns across the nation:</p>
<ul>
<li>While Republican Carly Fiorina made a serious move in the advertising battle last week, Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer still ran more ads overall. Boxer continues to receive good news in polling results for the California Senate race, driving positive online buzz.</li>
<li>Alex Sink&#8217;s gubernatorial campaign in Florida ran only five total ads in Jacksonville and was silent in Miami, Orlando, Tampa, and West Palm Beach. Rick Scott, meanwhile, blanketed the airwaves with almost 1,400 total ads. But ads bought and aired by the Florida Democratic Party helped to balance out Scott’s message on the airwaves.</li>
<li>While the latest public polls appear to be in Democratic Governor Martin O’Malley’s favor, Republican Bob Ehrlich accelerated his advertising buy last week as the campaign enters its final month.</li>
<li>In Pennsylvania&#8217;s U.S. Senate race, Republican Pat Toomey increased his advertising lead last week over Democrat Joe Sestak. Support from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is driving negative discussion about Toomey on-air, and help from the White House is propelling Sestak’s climb in online buzz.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Midterm-Election-Media-Analysis-10-4-10.pdf">Nielsen’s Campaign Media Analysis</a> for more details on these and other contentious midterm political races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-campaign-gaffe-gives-jerry-brown-unwanted-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Scorecard: Key Races in FL, CA Show Surges in Total Ads and Online Buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-key-races-in-fl-ca-show-surges-in-total-ads-and-online-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-key-races-in-fl-ca-show-surges-in-total-ads-and-online-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Midterm Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Ehrlich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Scott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=24351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two Sunshine State candidates dominate opponents in the midterm election ad wars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running as an Independent, Gov. Charlie Crist dominated the ad race against his two opponents for the Florida Senate seat, according to a Nielsen analysis of last week&#8217;s campaign media activity. Crist&#8217;s total of 1,296 ads across the top five Florida markets last week was almost 50% more than his previous week&#8217;s output. The total was more than twice the number of ads placed by each of the governor&#8217;s top two opponents Kendrick Meek (D) and Marco Rubio (R).</p>
<p>Meanwhile in the race for Crist&#8217;s gubernatorial seat, Republican Rick Scott aired four times as many ads last week as his opponent Alex Sink (D). Both candidates aired their highest number of ads in the Tampa-St. Petersburg market, but the most obvious discrepancy came in the Miami market, where Scott&#8217;s campaign aired 344 ads as Sink&#8217;s campaign aired none.</p>
<p>In other high-profile races across the country:</p>
<ul>
<li>Meg Whitman led gubernatorial opponent Jerry Brown in overall advertising across the top four California media markets. But news that the former eBay CEO once employed an undocumented worker at her home drew a spike in online buzz and overall TV mentions on September 30.</li>
<li>Carly Fiorina enjoyed her first full week advertising during the general election for California&#8217;s Senate seat. While Fiorina&#8217;s ads aired in Los Angeles, Sacramento, and San Diego, she still had yet to air an ad in the San Francisco market, through October 3. Overall, Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer held a nearly 4-to-1 advertising advantage across the state last week.</li>
<li>The Baltimore market is proving to be the biggest battleground in the Maryland governor&#8217;s race. Incumbent Martin O&#8217;Malley (D) and opponent Bob Ehrlich (R) were neck-and-neck in Charm City&#8217;s ad race, while Ehrlich showed no advertising activity at all in the Washington, DC market. As a result, the candidates&#8217; names were more than twice as likely to be mentioned on local Baltimore television stations last week, compared to the DC airwaves.</li>
</ul>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nielsen-Political-Scorecard.pdf">Nielsen&#8217;s Campaign Media Analysis</a> on these and other contentious mid-term political races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/politics/political-scorecard-key-races-in-fl-ca-show-surges-in-total-ads-and-online-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Election Drives Record Mobile Web Usage</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-election-drives-record-mobile-web-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-election-drives-record-mobile-web-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australians' use of mobile phones to access mobile news sites has reached record levels in the wake of the country’s closest ever election result, according to the latest mobile traffic figures from The Nielsen Company.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australians&#8217; use of mobile phones to access mobile news sites has reached record levels in the wake of the country’s closest ever election result, according to the latest mobile traffic figures from The Nielsen Company.</p>
<p>Nielsen recorded an overall volume jump of 19 percent in August, with the major news publishers being the key beneficiaries of the increase in traffic.</p>
<p>Amongst the major news sites, Nine News saw the largest increase in mobile traffic in August, up 27 percent from July 2010. Fairfax Digital’s SMH and The Age mobile sites were up 21 percent and 18 percent respectively, while News Digital Media’s news.com.au increases 18 percent.</p>
<p>“The increasing ownership of smartphones and more affordable mobile data pricing plans have seen mobile Internet usage increase in recent months,” observes Matt Bruce, Managing Director of Nielsen’s online division in Australia. “This growth was given an extra jolt in August as Australians looked to mobile news sites via their mobile phones for updates on the election results and the subsequent negotiations with the Independents.”</p>
<p>Bruce notes that major spikes in mobile Internet usage to news sites were recorded on the day of the Federal Election and the day following (August 21 and 22), and then again on September 7 as the three Independents announced their decision, and the subsequent news that Labor had won the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/australian-election-drives-record-mobile-web-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than 6.5 Million Watch President Obama on &#8220;The View&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/more-than-6-5-million-watch-president-obama-on-the-view/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/more-than-6-5-million-watch-president-obama-on-the-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=23284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly five and half million homes - roughly 6.5 million viewers - tuned into "The View" on July 29 to see the interview with President Barack Obama.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly five and half million homes &#8211; roughly 6.5 million viewers &#8211; tuned into &#8220;The View&#8221; on July 29 to see the interview with President Barack Obama, a rarity for a daytime talkshow. The President&#8217;s appearance did not eclipse the viewership from previous primetime or late night interviews, but did exceed his Sunday morning news show appearances.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> President Obama &#8211; Non-Speech or Press Conference Television Appearances</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> RANK</th>
<th> Program</th>
<th> Date</th>
<th> # of Households</th>
<th> # of   Persons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">1</td>
<td>60 Minutes</td>
<td>11/16/08</td>
<td>17,329,000</td>
<td>25,105,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">2</td>
<td>60 Minutes</td>
<td>3/22/09</td>
<td>11,960,000</td>
<td>17,042,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">3</td>
<td>Tonight Show w/ Jay Leno</td>
<td>3/19/09</td>
<td>11,077,000</td>
<td>14,634,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">4</td>
<td>60 Minutes</td>
<td>9/13/09</td>
<td>7,908,000</td>
<td>10,518,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">5</td>
<td>Late Show w/ David Letterman</td>
<td>9/21/09</td>
<td>5,876,000</td>
<td>7,417,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">6</td>
<td>The View</td>
<td>7/29/10</td>
<td>5,466,368</td>
<td>6,589,673</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">7</td>
<td>Meet the Press</td>
<td>12/7/08</td>
<td>5,180,000</td>
<td>6,561,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">8</td>
<td>This Week</td>
<td>1/11/09</td>
<td>3,430,000</td>
<td>4,339,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">9</td>
<td>Face the Nation</td>
<td>3/29/09</td>
<td>3,010,000</td>
<td>3,700,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>In January, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/48-million-watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address/">48 million viewers</a> watched the President&#8217;s first State of the Union speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/more-than-6-5-million-watch-president-obama-on-the-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Advertising Spending Continues to Grow in China over Q1 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-advertising-spending-continues-to-grow-in-china-over-q1-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-advertising-spending-continues-to-grow-in-china-over-q1-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=21556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China’s growth in online advertising continues at a quick pace, reaching 4.06 billion RMB in the first quarter of 2010 - a 52.7% increase over the same period in 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Sail Ma, Vice President, Online Product &amp; Research, CR-Nielsen – a joint venture of The Nielsen Company in China</em></strong></p>
<p>China’s growth in online advertising continues at a quick pace, reaching 4.06 billion RMB in the first quarter of 2010—a 52.7% increase over the same period in 2009. This trend is expected to continue for the remainder of the year. The Fashion industry was the top spender, with almost 18% market share. Half of the top 10 industries lost market share in the first quarter.</p>
<p>China’s advertising market kept up a fast pace in the first quarter of 2010, after enjoying a 39% year-over-year growth for 2009. More than 3,600 advertisers in China advertised online during this time—an increase of 36.2% from Q1 2009.</p>
<p>This is a good start for the Chinese online advertising industry. Despite the difficult economic environment many countries struggled through last year, China enjoyed growth, and saw tremendous increases. As more advertisers step into the online market and advertisers regain their confidence, this trend of rapid growth should continue into the remainder of 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/china-online-spend.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-21557  aligncenter" title="china-online-spend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/china-online-spend.png" alt="china-online-spend" width="516" height="366" /></a></p>
<p>The Fashion category was the biggest spender, with a 17.7% of total market share. It is also a fast-growing industry, with market share increasing 3.3%, compared to Q1 of 2009. This top 10 industry played a major role in Q1, representing 87.6% share of the entire markets’ advertising value. Among the top 10, Real Estate is the only one that dropped in advertising value compared to 2009, leading to a 4.7% drop in market share. There were four other industries that also lost market share in Q1: Entertainment (-2.3%), Employment (-1.6%), Automotive (-0.2%) and Media (-0.2%).</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="4">Top 10 Industries by Online Ad Value (Q1 2010)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Industry</th>
<th> Market Share</th>
<th> YOY Value Change</th>
<th> YOY Market Share Change</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Fashion</td>
<td>17.7%</td>
<td>88.6%</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Automotive</td>
<td>15.7%</td>
<td>50.9%</td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-0.2%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Retail</td>
<td>10.8%</td>
<td>552.7%</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Computers/Electrical</td>
<td>10.1%</td>
<td>76.1%</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">FMCG</td>
<td>8.8%</td>
<td>90.2%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Finance</td>
<td>8.0%</td>
<td>78.4%</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Entertainment</td>
<td>7.0%</td>
<td>15.0%</td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-2.3%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Real Estate</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-36.1%</span></td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-4.7%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Employment</td>
<td>3.2%</td>
<td>2.4%</td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-1.6%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Media</td>
<td>2.8%</td>
<td>44.6%</td>
<td><span style="color: #ff0000;">-0.2%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="4">Source: Nielsen CR-Nielsen<br />
All &#8216;Internet advertising&#8217; mentioned in this article refers to display  advertising only, search advertising and text advertising are not  included. Advertising Value is based on CPM, and does not mean actual  advertising spend or revenue.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For more information, please visit <a href="http://www.cr-nielsen.com" target="_blank">www.cr-nielsen.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/online-advertising-spending-continues-to-grow-in-china-over-q1-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>48 Million Watch President Obama&#8217;s First State of the Union Address</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/48-million-watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/48-million-watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union Address]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=19647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 48 million viewers across 34 million homes tuned into to President Obama's State of the Union address which was broadcast on 11 networks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, January 27, 2010 President Barack Obama&#8217;s first State of the Union address was carried live from 9:00PM to approximately 10:20PM on 11 networks.  The sum of average audience for those networks was 48,009,595 viewers.  The networks carrying the address were ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, TEL, UNI, CNN, BET, CNBC, FOXNC, and MSNBC.</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> TV Ratings For President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union Speech</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Broadcast</th>
<th> Date</th>
<th> Networks</th>
<th># of Households</th>
<th> Average Viewership P2+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">State of the Union</td>
<td>1/27/10</td>
<td>Various (11)</td>
<td>34,182,725</td>
<td>48,009,595</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Viewership to President Obama&#8217;s first State of the Union was down 7% from President Bush’s first official State of the Union address on January 29, 2002, but up 5% from President Clinton’s first official address on January 25, 1994:</p>
<table class="chart" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="5"> TV Ratings For President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union Speech</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> Broadcast</th>
<th> Date</th>
<th> Networks</th>
<th># of Households</th>
<th> Average Viewership P2+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">G.W. Bush &#8211; State of the Union</td>
<td>1/29/02</td>
<td>Various (8)</td>
<td>35,547,000</td>
<td>51,773,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Clinton &#8211; State of the Union</td>
<td>1/25/94</td>
<td>Various (4)</td>
<td>31,000,000</td>
<td>45,800,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: The Nielsen Company</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ul>
<li>Download a historical look at <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/stateoftheunion-nielsenratings.pdf">ratings for State of the Union Addresses</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Newsworthy Buzz</strong><br />
The President&#8217;s speech was among the most widely discussed topics so far in 2010, rising over the last few days, but still eclipsed by the immense social media and news activity surrounding the earthquake in Haiti. Big media stories such as the Apple iPad announcement (the same day as the State of the Union) and the recent Jay Leno/Conan O&#8217;Brien late night shakeup also drew notable buzz.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/SOTU-Trends-buzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19678" title="SOTU-Trends-buzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/SOTU-Trends-buzz.png" alt="SOTU-Trends-buzz" width="575" height="302" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/48-million-watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

