<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Online + Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/category/online_mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Report: How Americans are Spending their Media Time&#8230; and Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-shifted viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans spend more than 33 hours per week watching video across the screens, according to the latest Nielsen Cross-Platform Report. But how they’re consuming content—traditional TV and otherwise—is changing. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans spend more than 33 hours per week watching video across the screens, according to the latest <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/cross-platform-report-q3-2011.html">Nielsen Cross-Platform Report</a>. But how they’re consuming content—traditional TV and otherwise—is changing. Demonstrating that consumers are increasingly making Internet connectivity a priority, 75.3 percent pay for broadband Internet (up from 70.9% last year); 90.4 percent pay for cable, telephone company-provided TV or satellite. Homes with both paid TV and broadband increased 5.5 percent since last year.</p>
<p>Changes are afoot, however, as consumers seek out the entertainment option that makes the most sense for them. The number of homes subscribing to wired cable has decreased 4.1 percent in the past year at the same time that telephone company-provided and satellite TV have seen increases of 21.1 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively.</p>
<p><strong>Broadcast-Only/Broadband Homes in Focus</strong><br />
Though less than 5 percent of TV households, homes with broadband Internet and free, broadcast TV are on the rise—growing 22.8 percent over last year. These households are also found to exhibit interesting video behaviors: they stream video twice as much as the general population and watch half as much TV.</p>
<p>Whether they’re cord-cutters or former broadcast-only homes that upgraded to Internet service, these homes represent a very small but growing group of U.S. consumers. Interestingly, roughly the same percentage of consumers in broadcast-only/broadband homes watch traditional TV, stream or use the Internet as in all cross-platform homes; the difference between these groups falls to time spent on these activities. Even broadcast-only/broadband homes spend the majority of their video time watching traditional TV: 122.6 minutes, compared to 11.2 for streaming on average each day.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cross-platform-viewing-chart.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30942" title="cross-platform-viewing-chart" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cross-platform-viewing-chart.png" alt="cross-platform-viewing-chart" width="565" height="239" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giants vs Patriots: Playbook for the Social Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NM Incite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Super Bowl XLVI team is winning the online competition? According to Nielsen and <a href="http://nmincite.com">NM Incite</a>, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, it might be a draw: the New England Patriots had more visitors on their team’s website, but the New York Giants have more buzz on social media.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30845" title="SuperBowlBuzz" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz1.gif" alt="SuperBowlBuzz" width="575" height="1008" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/SuperBowlBuzz.png">(click for high resolution image)</a></p>
<h3>Patriots have more online visitors, but Giants fans run up web stats</h3>
<p>During the run up to the playoffs in December 2011, the Patriots had 644,000 unique visitors to their official website, topping the Giants’ 574,000 visitors. However, Giants fans were more engaged when visiting their team’s website, viewing nearly twice as many pages (17 page views per person) compared to Patriots visitors, and spending over 10 minutes each on average.</p>
<h3>Super Bowl buzz: Giants fans cheer more for team, Tom Brady is MVP of social media</h3>
<p>Fans’ excitement throughout the playoffs carried over to social media. The Giants had more buzz about their team each week, with a 59 percent share of buzz compared to the Patriots’ 41 percent of buzz volume on blogs, message boards/forums, public posts on Twitter and Facebook and online news posts.  But Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady surpassed Giants QB Eli Manning, with nearly double the amount of buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/super-bowl-social-media-playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In India, Google Leads the Smartphone App Race</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major contributor to the fast-changing nature of smartphones in India is the explosion of Google&#8217;s Android onto the scene. The tremendous growth of Android since entering India last year has it taking the leadership position in terms of shipments last quarter. A Nielsen Informate panel found smartphone users in India spending more than 40 percent of total active time on their smartphones on data-centric activities. A full 25 percent of users&#8217; time with apps is spent on those developed by Google, with the Android Market, YouTube and Gmail leading ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major contributor to the fast-changing nature of smartphones in India is the explosion of Google&#8217;s Android onto the scene. The tremendous growth of Android since entering India last year has it taking the leadership position in terms of shipments last quarter. A Nielsen Informate panel found smartphone users in India spending more than 40 percent of total active time on their smartphones on data-centric activities. A full 25 percent of users&#8217; time with apps is spent on those developed by Google, with the Android Market, YouTube and Gmail leading the way.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-share-of-apps.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30790" title="in-share-of-apps" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-share-of-apps.png" alt="in-share-of-apps" width="570" height="265" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google has the #1 app in terms of reach for 5 out of top 7 genres, while Facebook dominates social networking</strong></p>
<p>Google properties occupy the top spot in five of the top seven genres, by reach. Facebook and Nimbuzz lead the social networking and chat genres respectively.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-genre.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30791" title="in-apps-genre" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-genre.png" alt="in-apps-genre" width="570" height="240" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google does well in time spent with the top app categories</strong><br />
Google apps dominate in terms of time spent for streaming video, GPS, email, and search. 94% of time spent on streaming video goes to YouTube, while 86% of time spent on GPS is with Google. However, when it comes to social networking and chat applications, Google struggles to obtain more than a few percentage points of time spent.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-data-apps.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30792" title="in-data-apps" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-data-apps.png" alt="in-data-apps" width="570" height="351" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Google apps dominate across age groups</strong><br />
Google Apps have a fairly uniform usage across age groups indicating the success Google has had in establishing itself with all mobile users.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-age.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30793" title="in-apps-age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/in-apps-age.png" alt="in-apps-age" width="570" height="290" /></a></p>
<p><span class="table_meta"><strong>About Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights</strong><br />
Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights leverages innovative smartphone metering technology to provide insights into evolving consumption patterns of mobile device users. Based on accurate, real-time usage data, we help clients understand consumer behavior and develop product and marketing strategies. Nielsen Informate Mobile Insights maintains opt-in smartphone panels to generate syndicated reports, in addition to building custom panels and conducting custom surveys for clients. Our insights aid decision makers across various segments like operators, OEMs, publishers, advertisers, content creators and aggregators and application developers.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/in-india-google-leads-the-smartphone-app-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 2011: Top U.S. Online Video Destinations</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-online-video-destinations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-online-video-destinations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CollegeHumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During December 2011, there were 164.3 million unique U.S. video viewers who streamed over 22 billion videos and spent more than 5 hours on average watching online video.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During December 2011, there were 164.3 million unique U.S. video  viewers who streamed over 22 billion videos and spent more than 5 hours  on average watching online video.</p>
<table class="rankings" style="width: 300px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Overall Online Video Usage (U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th> Dec-11</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Unique Viewers</td>
<td>164,298,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Total Streams</td>
<td>22,617,316,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Streams per Viewer</td>
<td>137.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Time per Viewer (hh:mm)</td>
<td>5:04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top Online Video Destinations by Unique Viewers (December 2011, U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Unique Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>131,382</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">VEVO</td>
<td>39,701</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo!</td>
<td>36,681</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Facebook</td>
<td>23,523</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>22,986</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>20,637</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">The CollegeHumor Network</td>
<td>19,261</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>19,261</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>16,684</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Perform Group</td>
<td>10,893</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen<br />
Read as: During December 2011, 131 million unique U.S. viewers watched YouTube video content</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top Online Video Destinations by Total Streams (000) (December 2011, U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Total Streams (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>13,782,781</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>756,921</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">VEVO</td>
<td>435,411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>358,784</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo!</td>
<td>338,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Netflix</td>
<td>251,792</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>233,104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Comcast Digital Entertainment Websites</td>
<td>216,502</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>205,260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Disney Online</td>
<td>167,892</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen<br />
Read as: During December 2011, over 13 billion videos were streamed on YouTube</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top Online Video Destinations by Time per Viewer (Decemeber 2011, U.S.) / 500K Unique Viewer Minimum</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Time per Viewer (hh:mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Netflix</td>
<td>10:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>3:08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Youtube</td>
<td>3:02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Justin.TV</td>
<td>2:28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Megavideo</td>
<td>2:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Youku</td>
<td>1:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CWTV.com</td>
<td>1:32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CBS Entertainment Websites</td>
<td>1:05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Nickelodeon Family &amp; Parents</td>
<td>1:04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ABC Television</td>
<td>1:03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Read as: During December 2011, Netflix video viewers in the U.S. spent an average of 10 hours, 7 minutes watching video content on Netflix</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-online-video-destinations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 2011 &#8211; Top U.S. Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet penetration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top U.S. Web brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall, 211 million Americans were active online in December 2011 and Nielsen estimated that over 273 million Americans had access to the Internet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, 211 million Americans were active online in December 2011 and Nielsen estimated that over 273 million Americans had access to the Internet.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Web Brands for December 2011 (U.S., Total)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Total Internet Audience (000)</th>
<th>Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>173,325</td>
<td>1:36:42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Facebook</td>
<td>153,385</td>
<td>6:51:09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Yahoo!</td>
<td>144,227</td>
<td>2:17:14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>128,755</td>
<td>1:28:20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>YouTube</td>
<td>128,061</td>
<td>1:37:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>99,717</td>
<td>0:44:43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Amazon</td>
<td>87,920</td>
<td>0:42:10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>AOL Media Network</td>
<td>84,026</td>
<td>2:51:19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>79,118</td>
<td>1:08:28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Wikipedia</td>
<td>74,368</td>
<td>0:17:36</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Read as: During December 2011, 173.3 million unique U.S. people visited Google’s websites.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Average U.S. Internet Usage for December 2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metrics</th>
<th>Total</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="200">Sessions/Visits per Person</td>
<td>62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Domains Visited per Person</td>
<td>94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web Page Views per Person</td>
<td>2803</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration of a Web Page viewed</td>
<td>00:01:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Online Time per Person</td>
<td>28:06:22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People Who Went Online</td>
<td>211,932,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of People who had Internet access</td>
<td>273,286,092</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Read as: 211 million Americans were active online during December 2011.</p>
<p>Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/december-2011-top-u-s-web-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More US Consumers Choosing Smartphones as Apple Closes the Gap on Android</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the latest research from Nielsen, the high-profile launch of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the Fall had an enormous impact on the proportion of smartphone owners who chose an Apple iPhone. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the latest research from Nielsen, the high-profile launch of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the Fall had an enormous impact on the proportion of smartphone owners who chose an Apple iPhone. Among recent acquirers, meaning those who said they got a new device within the past three months, 44.5 percent of those surveyed in December said they chose an iPhone, compared to just 25.1 percent in October.  Furthermore, 57 percent of new iPhone owners surveyed in December said they got an iPhone 4S.</p>
<p>Android continues to hold the lead among all smartphone users, with 46.3 percent of all smartphone owners surveyed in Q42011 reporting they have an Android-based mobile phone.</p>
<p>As of Q42011, 46 percent of US mobile consumers had smartphones, and that figure is growing quickly.  In fact, 60 percent of those who said they got a new device within the last three months chose a smartphone over a feature phone.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-os-share.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30694" title="smartphone-os-share" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-os-share.png" alt="smartphone-os-share" width="497" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-penetration.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30693" title="smartphone-penetration" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-penetration.png" alt="smartphone-penetration" width="399" height="324" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-recent.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30692" title="smartphone-recent" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-recent.png" alt="smartphone-recent" width="557" height="452" /></a></p>
<p>For more, check out Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-the-rise-of-smartphones-apps-and-the-mobile-web/">Mobile Media Report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Electronics Websites: Microsoft is Most Visited, but Apple has Longest Time Spent</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/consumer-electronics-websites-microsoft-is-most-visited-but-apple-has-longest-time-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/consumer-electronics-websites-microsoft-is-most-visited-but-apple-has-longest-time-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overstock.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top online brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft was the most visited Computer and Consumer Electronics brand in September 2011 with 93.8 million unique U.S. visitors, according to Nielsen’s State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers are turning to a range of sources for consumer electronics information, with Microsoft leading as the most visited computer and consumer electronics brand online in September 2011. Microsoft&#8217;s websites saw nearly 94 million unique U.S. visitors, according to <a title="Nielsen's State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>. Among top brands in the category, consumers spent the most time on Apple’s websites, where 68.7 million visitors averaged one hour and two minutes per person, compared to 42 minutes on Microsoft’s sites. Adobe, Mozilla, and CNET rounded out the top five brands, with 24 to 28 million visitors going to their sites and spending 2 to 6 minutes each on average. CNET was the only news website among the top 5 in this category overall.</p>
<p>Amazon emerged as the clear category leader among mass merchandiser brands. Seventy-two million visitors, about one in three active web users, browsed the online shopping site in September 2011 for an average of 29 minutes per person. Walmart&#8217;s followed as the second-ranked site, where 34.5 million visitors spent an average of 13 minutes per person on the site. Target, Shopathome.com, and Overstock.com rounded out the top five most visited mass merchandiser websites.</p>
<p>Women made up the majority of visitors to both categories of websites. More than three out of four women who were active online visited consumer electronics sites during September 2011, compared to seven out of 10 men. Women were also 7 percent more likely to visit mass merchandiser sites. Young people aged 18-34 were slightly more likely than the general population (4 percent more likely) to visit consumer electronics sites.</p>
<p>For additional insights on consumer electronics and media usage, <a title="Nielsen State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/" target="_blank">download Nielsen’s State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/consumer-electronics-websit.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30672  aligncenter" title="consumer-electronics-websit" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/consumer-electronics-websit.png" alt="consumer-electronics-websit" width="457" height="353" /></a><span style="font-family: 'MS Shell Dlg 2'; direction: ltr; word-wrap: break-word; color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;"><a style="border-color: #009dd9; line-height: 17px; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; margin: 0px; font-family: Helvetica,Arial; color: #009dd9; font-size: 12px;" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/" href="../mediauniverse/"></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/consumer-electronics-websites-microsoft-is-most-visited-but-apple-has-longest-time-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers OK with Ads&#8230; if the Apps are Free</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should look no further than free apps. According to Nielsen’s Consumer Usage Report, 51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should consider the power of free apps.  According to Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>,  51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free.  Free apps are preferred by mobile consumers, though many opt for a combination of both free and paid apps to include in their collection, which usually averages 33 apps total.</p>
<p>Among tablet and smartphone users who downloaded only free apps in the past month, 33 percent chose games, 20 percent chose social networking and 18 percent chose music.  However, app downloaders are willing to shell out money. Consumers who downloaded just paid apps or a combination of free and paid apps invested the most in games (35%), maps/navigation (29%) and music (27%).</p>
<p>For additional insights on consumer electronics and media usage, download Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30659" title="top-app-categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png" alt="top-app-categories" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Consumer Media Usage Across TV, Online, Mobile and Social</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-consumer-media-usage-across-tv-online-mobile-and-social/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-consumer-media-usage-across-tv-online-mobile-and-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost one in three U.S. TV households - 35.9 million - owns four or more televisions, according to Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost one in three U.S. TV households &#8211; 35.9 million &#8211; owns four or more televisions, according to a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">new report on media usage</a> from Nielsen.  Across the ever-changing U.S. media landscape, TV maintains its stronghold as the most popular device, with 290 million Americans and 114.7 households owning at least one. In contrast, 211 million Americans are online and 116 million (ages 13+) access the mobile Web.</p>
<p>For more insights on usage and trends across TV, mobile, online, and social media download Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tv-media-landscape.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30646" title="tv-media-landscape" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tv-media-landscape.png" alt="tv-media-landscape" width="575" height="758" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-consumer-media-usage-across-tv-online-mobile-and-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2011: Top U.S. Online Destinations for Video</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-online-destinations-for-video/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-online-destinations-for-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During November 2011, there were 166.9 million unique U.S. video viewers who streamed almost 22 billion videos and spent more than 5 hours on average watching online video.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During November 2011, there were 166.9 million unique U.S. video  viewers who streamed almost 22 billion videos and spent more than 5 hours  on average watching online video.</p>
<table class="rankings" style="width: 300px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Overall Online Video Usage (U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th> Nov-11</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Unique Viewers</td>
<td>166,937,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Total Streams</td>
<td>21,936,751,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Streams per Viewer</td>
<td>131.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Time per Viewer (hh:mm)</td>
<td>5:23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top Online Video Destinations by Unique Viewers (November 2011, U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Unique Viewers (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>130,775</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">VEVO</td>
<td>42,729</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo!</td>
<td>34,383</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Facebook</td>
<td>30,255</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>24,612</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>22,023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>20,834</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">The CollegeHumor Network</td>
<td>20,570</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>17,864</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">CNN Digital Network</td>
<td>10,569</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Read as: During November 2011, 130 million unique U.S. viewers watched YouTube video content</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Top Online Video Destinations by Total Streams (000) (November 2011, U.S.)</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Total Streams (000)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>13,436,002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>819,544</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">VEVO</td>
<td>535,951</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">AOL Media Network</td>
<td>439,120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Yahoo!</td>
<td>270,422</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Netflix</td>
<td>260,272</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Comcast Digital Entertainment Websites</td>
<td>237,427</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">ESPN Digital Network</td>
<td>229,966</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">MSN/WindowsLive/Bing</td>
<td>229,002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Livestream</td>
<td>186,162</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Read as: During November 2011, 13 billion videos were streamed on YouTube</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top Online Video Destinations by Time per Viewer (November 2011, U.S.) / 250K Unique Viewer Minimum</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Video Brand</th>
<th> Time per Viewer (hh:mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Netflix</td>
<td>10:43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Hulu</td>
<td>3:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">GorillaVid</td>
<td>3:11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">YouTube</td>
<td>3:07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Justin.TV</td>
<td>3:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Celeb Junkies</td>
<td>2:51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Livestream</td>
<td>2:38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Megavideo</td>
<td>2:31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Cwtv.com</td>
<td>1:57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tudou.com</td>
<td>1:18</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Source: Nielsen</p>
<p>Read as: During November 2011, Netflix video viewers in the U.S. spent an average of 10 hours, 43 minutes watching video content on Netflix</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/november-2011-top-u-s-online-destinations-for-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

