<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire &#187; Media + Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/category/media_entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &#38; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Report: How Americans are Spending their Media Time&#8230; and Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time-shifted viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans spend more than 33 hours per week watching video across the screens, according to the latest Nielsen Cross-Platform Report. But how they’re consuming content—traditional TV and otherwise—is changing. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans spend more than 33 hours per week watching video across the screens, according to the latest <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/cross-platform-report-q3-2011.html">Nielsen Cross-Platform Report</a>. But how they’re consuming content—traditional TV and otherwise—is changing. Demonstrating that consumers are increasingly making Internet connectivity a priority, 75.3 percent pay for broadband Internet (up from 70.9% last year); 90.4 percent pay for cable, telephone company-provided TV or satellite. Homes with both paid TV and broadband increased 5.5 percent since last year.</p>
<p>Changes are afoot, however, as consumers seek out the entertainment option that makes the most sense for them. The number of homes subscribing to wired cable has decreased 4.1 percent in the past year at the same time that telephone company-provided and satellite TV have seen increases of 21.1 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively.</p>
<p><strong>Broadcast-Only/Broadband Homes in Focus</strong><br />
Though less than 5 percent of TV households, homes with broadband Internet and free, broadcast TV are on the rise—growing 22.8 percent over last year. These households are also found to exhibit interesting video behaviors: they stream video twice as much as the general population and watch half as much TV.</p>
<p>Whether they’re cord-cutters or former broadcast-only homes that upgraded to Internet service, these homes represent a very small but growing group of U.S. consumers. Interestingly, roughly the same percentage of consumers in broadcast-only/broadband homes watch traditional TV, stream or use the Internet as in all cross-platform homes; the difference between these groups falls to time spent on these activities. Even broadcast-only/broadband homes spend the majority of their video time watching traditional TV: 122.6 minutes, compared to 11.2 for streaming on average each day.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cross-platform-viewing-chart.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30942" title="cross-platform-viewing-chart" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cross-platform-viewing-chart.png" alt="cross-platform-viewing-chart" width="565" height="239" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-how-americans-are-spending-their-media-time-and-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doritos&#8217; &#8220;Sling Baby&#8221; Emerges as Most-Remembered and Best-Liked Super Bowl Ad</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/doritos-sling-baby-emerges-as-nielsens-most-remembered-and-best-liked-super-bowl-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/doritos-sling-baby-emerges-as-nielsens-most-remembered-and-best-liked-super-bowl-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doritos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Super Bowl showdown taking place during the commercial breaks emerged with a clear winner this year: Doritos.  According to Nielsen, the "Sling Baby" ad earned the rare distinction of both the most memorable and best liked ad, while "Man’s Best Friend" also had a very strong showing in the top third of both lists. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl showdown taking place during the game&#8217;s commercial breaks emerged with a clear winner this year: Doritos. According to Nielsen, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GIeIpcRv7o" target="_blank">the &#8220;Sling Baby&#8221; ad</a> earned the rare distinction of both the most memorable and best-liked ad, while &#8220;Man&#8217;s Best Friend&#8221; also had a very strong showing in the top one-third of both lists.  M&amp;M’s &#8220;Just my Shell,&#8221; featuring LMFAO&#8217;s &#8220;Sexy and I Know It&#8221; joined Doritos in rounding out the top three.  However, Super Bowl ads are arguably all winners: on average, they are 34 percent more memorable and 42 percent better liked than commercials that aired in January 2012.</p>
<p>The commercials joining the ranks of the Nielsen Top 10 Most-Remembered and Best-Liked Ads came from familiar brands that also were able to generate a large share of Super Bowl advertising buzz before and during the game.  According to NM Incite, a Nielsen/McKinsey company, Pepsi had the <a href="http://www.nmincite.com/?p=6350" target="_blank">most buzz</a> among Super Bowl advertisers on game day; Coca-Cola, M&amp;M’s, and Doritos also followed with a significant share of social media discussion.</p>
<p>The most-liked ads spanned a variety of categories, including food and beverage, financial services, and auto.  Excluding Chrysler’s ad featuring Clint Eastwood, which touched on pushing through tough economic times, all of the most liked ads included humor.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Nielsen Top 10 <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Most-Remembered</span> 2012 Super Bowl Ads</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Recall Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Recall Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Grandma slings baby across yard to snatch chips (:30)</td>
<td>177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>M&amp;M&#8217;s</td>
<td>M&amp;M shows his milk chocolate (:30)</td>
<td>175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Dog buries cat and bribes owner with snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Skechers</td>
<td>Gorun &#8212; Little dog moonwalks across the finish line (:30)</td>
<td>164</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Coca-Cola</td>
<td>Polar bear has trouble catching bottle of soda (:60)</td>
<td>163</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Bud Light</td>
<td>Dog fetches drinks when his name is called (:60)</td>
<td>161</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Pepsi</td>
<td>Melanie Amaro dumps Sir Elton John into the king&#8217;s dungeon (:60)</td>
<td>155</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>People drink beer from end of Prohibition to present (:60)</td>
<td>150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>GoDaddy.com</td>
<td>GoDaddy.co &#8212; Danica Patrick and Jillian Michaels body paint a model (:30)</td>
<td>149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Budweiser</td>
<td>Americans celebrate the end of Prohibition (:60)</td>
<td>145</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Nielsen Top 10 <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Best-Liked</span> 2012 Super Bowl Ads</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Likeability Rank</th>
<th>Brand</th>
<th>Ad Description</th>
<th>Likeability Index</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Grandma slings baby across yard to snatch chips (:30)</td>
<td>190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Doritos</td>
<td>Dog buries cat and bribes owner with snack chips (:30)</td>
<td>182</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>M&amp;M&#8217;s</td>
<td>M&amp;M shows his milk chocolate (:30)</td>
<td>171</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>E*Trade</td>
<td>Baby gives new dad financial advice (:30)</td>
<td>158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Coca-Cola</td>
<td>Polar bear crosses everything for good luck (:30)</td>
<td>152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Bud Light</td>
<td>Dog fetches drinks when his name is called (:60)</td>
<td>143</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Audi</td>
<td>Vampires combust from car headlights (:60)</td>
<td>139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Chrysler</td>
<td>Clint Eastwood talks    about Detroit&#8217;s resilience (:120)</td>
<td>137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Chevrolet</td>
<td>New grad is ecstatic    about the wrong graduation gift (:30)</td>
<td>130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Honda</td>
<td>CR-V &#8212; Matthew    Broderick plays sick&#8230;again (:60)</td>
<td>129</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><span style="font-size:11px;">Nielsen Measures &amp; Methodology:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Source: Nielsen, 2/7/12</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">The Recall score is the percentage of viewers who can Recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Recall Index of 177, the Doritos &#8220;Sling Baby&#8221; ad was 77% better-recalled than the average Super Bowl spot.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">The Likeability score is the percentage of viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl, among those recalling the brand of the ad. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Likeability Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Likeability Index of 190, the Doritos &#8220;Sling Baby&#8221; ad was almost twice as liked compared to the average Super Bowl spot.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Notes: The Top 10 lists are based on 11,873 surveys of Super Bowl viewers; 62 unique national creative executions (excluding Movie spots) during Q1-4 and Halftime were considered for the list.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/doritos-sling-baby-emerges-as-nielsens-most-remembered-and-best-liked-super-bowl-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl’s Greatest Hits: Top 10 Most Liked Ads of the Past Five Years</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Bowl ads are known for generating buzz—and viewers—but not all creatives are created equal. Nielsen reveals America’s most liked commercials over the past five years, and the NFL itself tops the list.  Regardless of category, emotional appeals, humor, non-fatal violence, and animals bolster quality ads and strongly resonate with consumers when executed well.</p>
<p>Of the 144 brands that have advertised during the Super Bowl over the past five years, only a handful of companies have had a presence in every one. From 2007-2011, these seven have earn honorable mentions for being the most resilient Super Bowl advertisers—Budweiser, CareerBuilder, Coca-Cola, Doritos, E*Trade, GoDaddy.com, and the NFL—and five also hold the distinction of being among the ten best liked Super Bowl ads of the past five years.</p>
<div id="playlist"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;">Nielsen’s Top Ten Most Liked Super Bowl Ads, 2007-2011</span>
<div class="yt_holder">
<div id="ytvideo2"></div>
<ul class="demo2">
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pvBvcuSV0w"><span class="number">1</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>NFL</strong></center>Chester Pitts walks  onto the Houston Texans team (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>179</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1hlGlFuWRc"><span class="number">2</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>A horse trains intensively to join the elite Clydesdales (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>176</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEH1omnG77c"><span class="number">3</span><span class="year"><center>2010 &bull; Super Bowl XLIV<br /><strong>Snickers</strong></center>Betty White and Abe  Vigoda are tackled (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>168</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3Nmkq60uaQ"><span class="number">4</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super  Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Budweiser</strong></center>Clydesdale wants to  play his version of fetch (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>167</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0V6c1rzTsQ"><span class="number">5</span><span class="year"><center>2011 &bull;  Super Bowl XLV<br /><strong>Volkswagen</strong></center>Mini Darth Vader uses  the Force to turn on a car (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>165</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiMf5cCDy1I"><span class="number">6</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Coca-Cola</strong></center>Stewie, Wonder Dog,  and Charlie Brown balloons compete for soda (:60)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>155</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUFvJNQ0bnM"><span class="number">7</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLI<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man faces consequences of snacking while driving (:30) <br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>153</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFsKeDAJPak"><span class="number">8</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull; Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>Bridgestone</strong></center>Forest animals scream as car nearly hits a squirrel (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>150</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cCli-IPaoU"><span class="number">9</span><span class="year"><center>2008 &bull;Super  Bowl XLII<br /><strong>E*Trade</strong></center>Baby says he rented a  clown with his extra money (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>146</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT6YOgbB-gM"><span class="number">10</span><span class="year"><center>2009 &bull; Super Bowl XLIII<br /><strong>Doritos</strong></center>Man has magical  powers when he crunches his snack chip (:30)<br /><strong>Likeability Index:</strong>145</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Only ad executions during Super Bowl airings from 2007-2011 considered.  The Likeability Score is the percentage of TV viewers who report to like &#8220;a lot&#8221; an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing TV (among those recalling the brand of the ad). These scores are then indexed against the mean score for all new ads during the period (Likeability Index). 100 equals average.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">For example, with a Likeability index of 179 the top ranked NFL ad has proven to be 79 percent better-liked than the average Super Bowl commercial during the past four-week period.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11px;">Source: Nielsen</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/super-bowls-greatest-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Super Bowl Investment: Ad Spend Trends Over the Past Five Super Bowls</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they get a measurable bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011's Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Super Bowl ads require a substantial investment, they tend to get a measurable marketing bump from their prominent placement.  According to Nielsen, ads that aired during 2011&#8217;s Super Bowl XLV were, on average, 58 percent more memorable than commercials airing during regular programming in the first quarter of 2011.  In addition, brand awareness for commercials airing during the Super Bowl was up to 275 percent higher than awareness for the same creative during regular programming.</p>
<p><strong>Cost of an Ad</strong><br />
The Super Bowl investment is economically resilient, remaining relatively stable despite fluctuations in the primetime average—and rising consistently over the past five years despite a rocky economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-30807 aligncenter" title="AvgCost-30SecAd" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AvgCost-30SecAd.gif" alt="AvgCost-30SecAd" width="278" height="220" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Big Spenders: Automotive Makes a Comeback</strong><br />
2011 was the year of the auto comeback.  Spending on automotive ads far surpassed other categories and more than doubled versus previous years.  Nine different auto brands took center field in the commercial breaks, versus an average of two to four brands in years prior.  Creative quality also improved in 2011, with an unprecedented four auto spots making Nielsen’s annual <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/" target="_self">Most-Liked list</a>.  Chevrolet’s “Wild Ride” garnered the distinction of being the most watched ad of all time, with an estimated 119,628,000 viewers watching its Super Bowl airing.  This year, Chevy is breaking ground again with the Game Time app, which will leverage consumers&#8217; simultaneous cross-screen behavior and reinforce branding from traditional TV advertisements.</p>
<p><strong>Top Five Super Bowl Advertising Categories (2007-2011)</strong><br />
Year Over Year Spend Breakdown (in millions)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30808 aligncenter" title="Top5-SBAdCat" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Top5-SBAdCat.png" alt="Top5-SBAdCat" width="433" height="728" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Other Spend Trends</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Beer</strong>: Bud Light and Budweiser have dominated the turf when if comes to Super Bowl beer advertising over the past five years.  Consumers have come to expect the fleet of creatives, including the iconic Clydesdale ads.  In 2010 and 2011, other brands like Michelob and Stella Artois came to play.  What can viewers expect this year?</li>
<li><strong>Motion Picture</strong>: Movies have a strong presence in Super Bowl ad lineup, as studios capitalize on the massive audience to parade their best bets for the year.  From 2008-2011, at least one of the top five highest grossing films had a slot in the Super Bowl line up.  Motion picture ads increased after 2008 and have had a consistently strong presence during the game since, reaching ten ads in last year’s game.</li>
<li><strong>Regular Soft Drink</strong>: While fewer Soft Drink ads have traditionally aired during the Super Bowl compared to other categories, they make an impact by creating minute-long spots.</li>
<li><strong>Tortilla Chips</strong>:  Tortilla Chips have emerged as a highly anticipated category of ads, led by the fan created ads.   Last year, three Doritos ads made Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/chevys-wild-ride-most-watched-ad-of-all-time-while-little-darth-vader-is-super-bowl-favorite/">Most Liked and Most Remembered list</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/the-super-bowl-investment-ad-spend-trends-over-the-past-five-super-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>38 Million Watch President Obama’s State of the Union Address</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/38-million-watch-president-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/38-million-watch-president-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address.  The address was carried live from 9:00PM to approximately 10:15 PM on 14 networks.  The sum of average audience for those networks was 37,652,713 viewers, with a combined household rating of 24.0.  The networks carrying the address were ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, CNBC, CNN, FBN, FOXNC, GALA, MSNBC, MUN2 and on tape delay on TEL, TF and UNI.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address.  The address was carried live from 9:00PM to approximately 10:15 PM on 14 networks.  The sum of average audience for those networks was <strong>37,752,613 </strong>viewers, with a combined household rating of <strong>24.0</strong>.  The networks carrying the address were ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, CNBC, CNN, FBN, FOXNC, GALA, MSNBC, MUN2 and on tape delay on TEL, TF and UNI.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> State of the Union, January 24, 2012</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th width="300">Networks</th>
<th>Combined Household Rating</th>
<th>Combined Household Share</th>
<th>Number of Households</th>
<th>Number of Persons 2+</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="300">ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, TEL, TF, UNI, CNBC, CNN, FBN, FOXNC, GALA, MSNBC and MUN2</td>
<td>24.0</td>
<td>38</td>
<td>27,569,423</td>
<td>37,752,613</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption> Major Addresses to Congress, 2009-2011</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th width="300">Subject</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th># of Networks</th>
<th>Combined Household Rating</th>
<th>Combined Household Share</th>
<th>Number of Households</th>
<th>Number of Persons</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="300">Obama &#8211; State of the Union</td>
<td>1/25/11</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>26.6</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>30,871,688</td>
<td>42,789,947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="300">Obama &#8211;   State of the Union</td>
<td>1/27/10</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>29.8</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>34,182,725</td>
<td>48,009,595</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="300">Obama –   “Address to the Joint Sessions of Congress”</td>
<td>2/24/09</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>32.5</td>
<td>49</td>
<td>37,185,000</td>
<td>52,373,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="7">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
<p>Download a <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/State-of-the-Union-Historic-Track-Through-2011.pdf">historic look at State of the Union ratings and viewership</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/38-million-watch-president-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year in Sports Advertising: TV Ad Spend Grows to $10.9B</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National TV sports advertising generated $10.9 billion in revenue last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National TV sports generated $10.9 billion in advertising expenditure last year, compared to $10.3 billion one year prior, according to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>. Measuring ad spend during sporting events on network and cable TV from Q4 2010 through Q3 2011, Nielsen also saw that cable has an increasing share of those ad dollars—growing 37.3 percent year over year compared to 5.9 percent for sports ad spending in general.</p>
<p>TV sports advertising is dominated by a few big spenders, with the top 10 — led by AT&amp;T, Bud Light, Verizon Wireless, McDonald’s and DIRECTV—accounting for roughly a quarter (26%) of the total spend during that time period.</p>
<p>The increase in TV ad spend mirrors a similar increase in the amount of live TV sports content available on TV and cable. There were more than 42,500 hours of live sporting events on national broadcast and cable TV in 2011, a five percent increase over 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-30730  aligncenter" title="year-in-sports-ads" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/year-in-sports-ads.png" alt="year-in-sports-ads" width="500" height="824" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>For more insights on sports and media, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-media--2011-year-in-sports.html" target="_blank">Nielsen’s State of the Media: Year in Sports</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/year-in-sports-advertising-tv-ad-spend-grows-to-10-9b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Study: Fisher’s KOMO and KATU-TV Sees Cross-Platform Bump</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As daily deal and other hyperlocal offerings change the local media landscape, TV station operators like Fisher Communications Inc., an innovative local media company with TV, radio, Internet and mobile operations, are striving to understand their online and offline audience in order to better leverage their content and advertising inventory. Nielsen analysis revealed that for local markets, station websites may contribute added reach to both early and late news broadcasts, and the results are not insignificant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As daily deal and other hyper-local offerings change the local media landscape, TV station operators like Fisher Communications Inc., an innovative local media company with TV, radio, Internet and mobile operations, are striving to understand their online and offline audience in order to better leverage their content and advertising inventory. <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/case-study--local-cross-platform-measurement.html">Nielsen analysis</a> revealed that for local markets, station websites may contribute added reach to both early and late news broadcasts. The results are not insignificant, particularly for select audiences like those ages 18-34.</p>
<p>Seattle’s KOMO station earned an incremental reach—unduplicated audience—of 2.9 percent from their website for persons 18 and older, amounting to 10 percent of the total combined reach for the station’s late news at 11 o’clock Monday through Friday. The website contributes even more for persons 18-34, boasting a 3.9 percent incremental reach that accounts for nearly a quarter (23%) of the total combined reach.</p>
<p>For Portland’s KATU-TV, <a href="http://www.katu.com">KATU.com</a> added 2.8 percent incremental reach to the 28.1 percent reach of the late news. For KATU, ages 25-54 saw the biggest lift thanks to KATU.com with a 4.6 percent reach. The website contributed 14 percent of the combined newscast and website reach for persons 25-54.</p>
<p>Pinpointing the notable differences in demographic composition between website users and newscast viewers helps stations value their inventory, while helping advertisers choose the most efficient vehicle to reach their intended audiences. Both KOMO.com and KATU.com attract significantly different audiences than their TV station counterparts. For example, the KOMO late news audience is 29 percent male, compared to 53 percent for <a title="KOMO News" href="http://www.komonews.com" target="_blank">komonews.com</a>. Nearly one-third (31%) of the Komo late news audience and one-quarter (24%) of the komonews.com audience has a household income of $100,000+.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30711" title="station-insights-1" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-1.png" alt="station-insights-1" width="570" height="481" /></a><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30712" title="station-insights-2" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/station-insights-2.png" alt="station-insights-2" width="570" height="600" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/case-study--local-cross-platform-measurement.html" target="_blank">Download the full case study at nielsen.com</a>.</p>
<p><strong>About Fisher Communications</strong><br />
Fisher Communications (FSCI) is an innovative local media company with television, radio, internet and mobile operations throughout the western United States. Fisher operates 18 television stations, which include network affiliations with ABC, CBS, FOX, Univision and The CW that reach 3.5% of U.S. television households, and three radio stations targeting a full range of audience demographics. Fisher Interactive produces more than 120 local and hyper-local websites and delivers comprehensive multiplatform advertising solutions to local businesses. The Company is headquartered at Fisher Plaza in Seattle, WA. More information about Fisher Communications, Inc. is available at <a href="http://www.fsci.com">www.fsci.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/case-study-fisher%e2%80%99s-komo-and-katu-tv-sees-cross-platform-bump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More US Consumers Choosing Smartphones as Apple Closes the Gap on Android</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the latest research from Nielsen, the high-profile launch of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the Fall had an enormous impact on the proportion of smartphone owners who chose an Apple iPhone. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the latest research from Nielsen, the high-profile launch of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the Fall had an enormous impact on the proportion of smartphone owners who chose an Apple iPhone. Among recent acquirers, meaning those who said they got a new device within the past three months, 44.5 percent of those surveyed in December said they chose an iPhone, compared to just 25.1 percent in October.  Furthermore, 57 percent of new iPhone owners surveyed in December said they got an iPhone 4S.</p>
<p>Android continues to hold the lead among all smartphone users, with 46.3 percent of all smartphone owners surveyed in Q42011 reporting they have an Android-based mobile phone.</p>
<p>As of Q42011, 46 percent of US mobile consumers had smartphones, and that figure is growing quickly.  In fact, 60 percent of those who said they got a new device within the last three months chose a smartphone over a feature phone.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-os-share.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30694" title="smartphone-os-share" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-os-share.png" alt="smartphone-os-share" width="497" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-penetration.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30693" title="smartphone-penetration" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-penetration.png" alt="smartphone-penetration" width="399" height="324" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-recent.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30692" title="smartphone-recent" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/smartphone-recent.png" alt="smartphone-recent" width="557" height="452" /></a></p>
<p>For more, check out Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-the-rise-of-smartphones-apps-and-the-mobile-web/">Mobile Media Report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/more-us-consumers-choosing-smartphones-as-apple-closes-the-gap-on-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaching Indonesia&#8217;s Middle Class</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/reaching-indonesias-middle-class/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/reaching-indonesias-middle-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer packaged goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermarkets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While other countries in the region and around the globe have been affected by significant economic uncertainty, Indonesia’s economy is running at full bore, with a rapidly expanding middle class that is now the third-largest in the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Catherine Eddy, Managing Director, Consumer, and Irawati Pratignyo, Managing Director, Media</em></strong></p>
<p>Just a few years ago, a major bank predicted that Indonesians would, on average, earn US$3,000 per capita by 2020. At the beginning of 2011, Indonesia hit that mark, beating the prediction by nearly a decade. While other countries in the region and around the globe have been affected by significant economic uncertainty, Indonesia’s economy is running at full bore, with a rapidly expanding middle class that is now the third-largest in the world. At 48 percent of the population and accounting for 44 percent of all FMCG spending in the country, middle class consumers are shaping today’s retail scene. Recently, during its 35<sup>th</sup> Annual Marketing and Media Presentation in Jakarta, Nielsen provided nearly 1,000 clients and stakeholders with a snapshot of what Indonesia’s middle class is doing in terms of media usage and shopping patterns, and how companies can reach them effectively.</p>
<p>While all income groups have benefited from Indonesia’s accelerated growth, the middle class has enjoyed the most rapid advances in terms of spending increases and quality of life improvement, and increased demand in a range of consumer categories from home electronics and appliances to health and beauty products. The Indonesian middle class prefers to combine the convenience and fresh offerings found through traditional retail channels such as wet markets with the price-savings and expansive product offerings of the modern trade.</p>
<p><strong>What are middle class Indonesians buying?<br />
</strong>Some key facts about middle class shopping trends that retailers and manufacturers need to consider include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Fresh food makes up 37 percent of their monthly spending. Ice cream, noodles, and biscuits are the biggest movers thanks to product innovations.</li>
<li>Value for money is key for nearly all (97%) middle class shoppers.</li>
<li>88 percent of middle class consumers said they want to experiment with brands.</li>
<li>More than half (53%) shop in a modern trade outlet twice a month.</li>
<li>They tend to visit the minimarket closest to their home, but promotions can disrupt their regular routine: 90 percent are looking for stores “with attractive and interesting promotions.” They also desire a diverse assortment of goods, friendly service and a comfortable environment.</li>
<li>Mini-markets see the highest levels of spending, followed by supermarkets, with traditional retailers still highly important for fresh foods and the location convenience they offer.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What are middle class Indonesians watching?<br />
</strong>Indonesians of all income levels love to watch TV, and nearly all (95%) middle class homes own a TV, with 96 percent watching programs every day. Other traditional media such as radio and newspapers are also popular, but are increasingly being consumed online, a trend driven primarily by Indonesian youth.  Internet usage and mobile phone ownership are surging, each increasing every quarter. Mobile penetration is already high, and purchase intent for smartphones is strong. These devices are fast becoming the primary platform for a variety of activities, such as watching video, accessing the Internet and connecting to social networks, opening a space for marketers and content providers to focus their efforts to include mobile in their content distribution. Nevertheless, relevancy and convenience to the consumers remain key to mobile content distribution.</p>
<p>Key media usage trends for middle class Indonesians include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Middle class Indonesian households watch an average of 4.5 hours of TV a day. Sports programming is the most popular, followed by drama series and other entertainment genres.</li>
<li>Local content is appealing to middle class, which is why each city has its own newspaper.</li>
<li>Almost a quarter (22%) of middle class consumers have Internet access, and spend 1.5 hours a day accessing the internet.</li>
<li>Nearly three-quarters of middle class consumers in major cities (71%) have a mobile phone, with almost half saying they use the devices to access the Internet. More than one-third (35%) have a smartphone.</li>
<li>Indonesians love social networking: 94 percent are connected to social networks, and 89 percent have a Facebook account.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Reaching the middle class<br />
</strong>Given the abundance of opportunities in the marketplace, how can retailers, manufacturers, marketers and media companies connect with the middle class consumer? In a number of consumer goods categories, innovation has proven to be a growth engine. For example, in the ice cream category, the number of new varieties has surged by nearly 32 percent, with single packs the driver of sales. Volume sales of snack noodles surged 92 percent in the past year, thanks in large part to new flavors and a repositioning of the category (what used to be seen as a basic meal now is a great, convenient snack). The instant coffee market has expanded, and middle class consumers contributed 71 percent of volume growth within that category.  In contrast, categories that presented few innovations saw slower growth.</p>
<p>In addition to innovation, other trends seen among Indonesia’s middle class consumers include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Kids playing a role in modern shopping: 95 percent said that they “hardly ever refuse” the invitation from their kids to go to the minimarket.</li>
<li>Convenience is key: today’s middle class consumers are pressed for time, with the demands of work and family life. Products that make life a bit easier are clear winners.</li>
<li>Appeal to the fact that they are smart shoppers: Indonesians know how much items cost and where they are located in the store. Retailers must create a welcoming environment, promote value for money and win customers’ loyalty.</li>
<li>Connect with consumers: they are increasingly online, and they discuss brands and products in that space. Retailers must strive to engage with them on social networks.</li>
<li>Be relevant: tailor marketing – especially online and mobile campaigns – to consumers and their need-states.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/reaching-indonesias-middle-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers OK with Ads&#8230; if the Apps are Free</title>
		<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=30658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should look no further than free apps. According to Nielsen’s Consumer Usage Report, 51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertisers and those aiming to reach smartphone and tablet users on their devices should consider the power of free apps.  According to Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>,  51 percent of consumers say that they are okay with advertising on their devices if it means they can access content for free.  Free apps are preferred by mobile consumers, though many opt for a combination of both free and paid apps to include in their collection, which usually averages 33 apps total.</p>
<p>Among tablet and smartphone users who downloaded only free apps in the past month, 33 percent chose games, 20 percent chose social networking and 18 percent chose music.  However, app downloaders are willing to shell out money. Consumers who downloaded just paid apps or a combination of free and paid apps invested the most in games (35%), maps/navigation (29%) and music (27%).</p>
<p>For additional insights on consumer electronics and media usage, download Nielsen’s <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/mediauniverse/">State of the Media: Consumer Usage Report</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-30659" title="top-app-categories" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/top-app-categories.png" alt="top-app-categories" width="575" height="450" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/consumers-ok-with-ads-if-the-apps-are-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

